Cargando…

Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study

OBJECTIVES: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease of the preterm retina with the potential to cause irreversible blindness. Timely screening and treatment of ROP are critical. Neonatal nurses trained in wide field digital retinal photography (WFDRP) for screening may provid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Athikarisamy, Sam Ebenezer, Lam, Geoffrey Christopher, Ross, Stuart, Rao, Shripada Cuddapah, Chiffings, Debbie, Simmer, Karen, Bulsara, Max K, Patole, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036483
_version_ 1783568164347445248
author Athikarisamy, Sam Ebenezer
Lam, Geoffrey Christopher
Ross, Stuart
Rao, Shripada Cuddapah
Chiffings, Debbie
Simmer, Karen
Bulsara, Max K
Patole, Sanjay
author_facet Athikarisamy, Sam Ebenezer
Lam, Geoffrey Christopher
Ross, Stuart
Rao, Shripada Cuddapah
Chiffings, Debbie
Simmer, Karen
Bulsara, Max K
Patole, Sanjay
author_sort Athikarisamy, Sam Ebenezer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease of the preterm retina with the potential to cause irreversible blindness. Timely screening and treatment of ROP are critical. Neonatal nurses trained in wide field digital retinal photography (WFDRP) for screening may provide a safe and effective strategy to reduce the burden of ophthalmologists in performing binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of WFDRP in the diagnosis of referral warranting ROP (RWROP). DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: A tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Perth, Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Preterm infants who fulfilled the Australian ROP screening criteria (gestational age (GA) <31 weeks, birth weight (BW) <1250 g). INTERVENTION: Sets of 5–6 images per eye (index test) were obtained within 24–48 hours prior to or after the BIO (reference standard), and uploaded onto a secured server. A wide field digital camera (RetCam, Natus, Pleasanton, California, USA) was used for imaging. A paediatric ophthalmologist performed the BIO. The ophthalmologists performing BIO versus reporting the images were masked to each other’s findings. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used as a measure of accuracy of WFDRP to diagnose RWROP. RESULTS: A total of 85 infants (mean BW; 973.43 g, mean GA; 29 weeks) underwent a median of two sessions of WFDRP. There were 188 episodes of screening with an average of five images per eye. WFDRP identified RWROP in 7.4% (14/188 sessions) of examinations. In one infant, BIO showed bilateral plus disease and WFDRP did not pick up the plus disease. WFDRP image interpretation had a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 94.5% for the detection of RWROP. The ‘area under the ROC curve’ was 88% when adjusted for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: WFDRP by neonatal nurses was feasible and effective for diagnosing RWROP in our set up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001386426.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7409991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74099912020-08-17 Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study Athikarisamy, Sam Ebenezer Lam, Geoffrey Christopher Ross, Stuart Rao, Shripada Cuddapah Chiffings, Debbie Simmer, Karen Bulsara, Max K Patole, Sanjay BMJ Open Ophthalmology OBJECTIVES: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease of the preterm retina with the potential to cause irreversible blindness. Timely screening and treatment of ROP are critical. Neonatal nurses trained in wide field digital retinal photography (WFDRP) for screening may provide a safe and effective strategy to reduce the burden of ophthalmologists in performing binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy (BIO). The objective of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of WFDRP in the diagnosis of referral warranting ROP (RWROP). DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: A tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Perth, Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Preterm infants who fulfilled the Australian ROP screening criteria (gestational age (GA) <31 weeks, birth weight (BW) <1250 g). INTERVENTION: Sets of 5–6 images per eye (index test) were obtained within 24–48 hours prior to or after the BIO (reference standard), and uploaded onto a secured server. A wide field digital camera (RetCam, Natus, Pleasanton, California, USA) was used for imaging. A paediatric ophthalmologist performed the BIO. The ophthalmologists performing BIO versus reporting the images were masked to each other’s findings. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used as a measure of accuracy of WFDRP to diagnose RWROP. RESULTS: A total of 85 infants (mean BW; 973.43 g, mean GA; 29 weeks) underwent a median of two sessions of WFDRP. There were 188 episodes of screening with an average of five images per eye. WFDRP identified RWROP in 7.4% (14/188 sessions) of examinations. In one infant, BIO showed bilateral plus disease and WFDRP did not pick up the plus disease. WFDRP image interpretation had a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 94.5% for the detection of RWROP. The ‘area under the ROC curve’ was 88% when adjusted for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: WFDRP by neonatal nurses was feasible and effective for diagnosing RWROP in our set up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616001386426. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7409991/ /pubmed/32759245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036483 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
Athikarisamy, Sam Ebenezer
Lam, Geoffrey Christopher
Ross, Stuart
Rao, Shripada Cuddapah
Chiffings, Debbie
Simmer, Karen
Bulsara, Max K
Patole, Sanjay
Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
title Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_full Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_fullStr Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_short Comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
title_sort comparison of wide field imaging by nurses with indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists for retinopathy of prematurity: a diagnostic accuracy study
topic Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32759245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036483
work_keys_str_mv AT athikarisamysamebenezer comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT lamgeoffreychristopher comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT rossstuart comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT raoshripadacuddapah comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT chiffingsdebbie comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT simmerkaren comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT bulsaramaxk comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy
AT patolesanjay comparisonofwidefieldimagingbynurseswithindirectophthalmoscopybyophthalmologistsforretinopathyofprematurityadiagnosticaccuracystudy