Cargando…
Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women’s experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hyst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373519840076 |
_version_ | 1783568180638121984 |
---|---|
author | Janda, Monika Armfield, Nigel R Kerr, Gayle Kurz, Suzanne Jackson, Graeme Currie, Jason Page, Katie Weaver, Edward Yazdani, Anusch Obermair, Andreas |
author_facet | Janda, Monika Armfield, Nigel R Kerr, Gayle Kurz, Suzanne Jackson, Graeme Currie, Jason Page, Katie Weaver, Edward Yazdani, Anusch Obermair, Andreas |
author_sort | Janda, Monika |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women’s experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hysterectomy in the preceding 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, the vast majority of women (>96%) did not regret having had the hysterectomy. Women who received an open abdominal hysterectomy reported slower recovery with about 7% of women still not fully recovered after 12 months compared to those whose surgery was through a less invasive approach. Women who reported no adverse events, having been given a choice of type of hysterectomy, women who received an alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy, and women who felt prepared for discharge from hospital were significantly more likely to be content with their hysterectomy and report positive patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those who received a less invasive approach to hysterectomy, women who received open surgery were more likely to express negative experiences relating to their hospital stay and recovery from surgery. The results inform future improvements of care for women planning a hysterectomy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7410135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74101352020-08-19 Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women Janda, Monika Armfield, Nigel R Kerr, Gayle Kurz, Suzanne Jackson, Graeme Currie, Jason Page, Katie Weaver, Edward Yazdani, Anusch Obermair, Andreas J Patient Exp Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women’s experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hysterectomy in the preceding 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, the vast majority of women (>96%) did not regret having had the hysterectomy. Women who received an open abdominal hysterectomy reported slower recovery with about 7% of women still not fully recovered after 12 months compared to those whose surgery was through a less invasive approach. Women who reported no adverse events, having been given a choice of type of hysterectomy, women who received an alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy, and women who felt prepared for discharge from hospital were significantly more likely to be content with their hysterectomy and report positive patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those who received a less invasive approach to hysterectomy, women who received open surgery were more likely to express negative experiences relating to their hospital stay and recovery from surgery. The results inform future improvements of care for women planning a hysterectomy. SAGE Publications 2019-04-25 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7410135/ /pubmed/32821797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373519840076 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Janda, Monika Armfield, Nigel R Kerr, Gayle Kurz, Suzanne Jackson, Graeme Currie, Jason Page, Katie Weaver, Edward Yazdani, Anusch Obermair, Andreas Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women |
title | Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women |
title_full | Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women |
title_fullStr | Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women |
title_short | Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women |
title_sort | patient-reported experiences after hysterectomy: a cross-sectional study of the views of over 2300 women |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373519840076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jandamonika patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT armfieldnigelr patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT kerrgayle patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT kurzsuzanne patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT jacksongraeme patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT curriejason patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT pagekatie patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT weaveredward patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT yazdanianusch patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women AT obermairandreas patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women |