Cargando…

Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women’s experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hyst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janda, Monika, Armfield, Nigel R, Kerr, Gayle, Kurz, Suzanne, Jackson, Graeme, Currie, Jason, Page, Katie, Weaver, Edward, Yazdani, Anusch, Obermair, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373519840076
_version_ 1783568180638121984
author Janda, Monika
Armfield, Nigel R
Kerr, Gayle
Kurz, Suzanne
Jackson, Graeme
Currie, Jason
Page, Katie
Weaver, Edward
Yazdani, Anusch
Obermair, Andreas
author_facet Janda, Monika
Armfield, Nigel R
Kerr, Gayle
Kurz, Suzanne
Jackson, Graeme
Currie, Jason
Page, Katie
Weaver, Edward
Yazdani, Anusch
Obermair, Andreas
author_sort Janda, Monika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women’s experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hysterectomy in the preceding 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, the vast majority of women (>96%) did not regret having had the hysterectomy. Women who received an open abdominal hysterectomy reported slower recovery with about 7% of women still not fully recovered after 12 months compared to those whose surgery was through a less invasive approach. Women who reported no adverse events, having been given a choice of type of hysterectomy, women who received an alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy, and women who felt prepared for discharge from hospital were significantly more likely to be content with their hysterectomy and report positive patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those who received a less invasive approach to hysterectomy, women who received open surgery were more likely to express negative experiences relating to their hospital stay and recovery from surgery. The results inform future improvements of care for women planning a hysterectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7410135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74101352020-08-19 Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women Janda, Monika Armfield, Nigel R Kerr, Gayle Kurz, Suzanne Jackson, Graeme Currie, Jason Page, Katie Weaver, Edward Yazdani, Anusch Obermair, Andreas J Patient Exp Research Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate women’s experiences after hysterectomy and predictors of their contentment and regret with the surgical approaches. METHODS: Cross-sectional, Patient-Reported Experience Measures survey in 2319 Australian women aged 21 to 90 years (median age of 52 years) who had received hysterectomy in the preceding 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, the vast majority of women (>96%) did not regret having had the hysterectomy. Women who received an open abdominal hysterectomy reported slower recovery with about 7% of women still not fully recovered after 12 months compared to those whose surgery was through a less invasive approach. Women who reported no adverse events, having been given a choice of type of hysterectomy, women who received an alternative to open abdominal hysterectomy, and women who felt prepared for discharge from hospital were significantly more likely to be content with their hysterectomy and report positive patient experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with those who received a less invasive approach to hysterectomy, women who received open surgery were more likely to express negative experiences relating to their hospital stay and recovery from surgery. The results inform future improvements of care for women planning a hysterectomy. SAGE Publications 2019-04-25 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7410135/ /pubmed/32821797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373519840076 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Janda, Monika
Armfield, Nigel R
Kerr, Gayle
Kurz, Suzanne
Jackson, Graeme
Currie, Jason
Page, Katie
Weaver, Edward
Yazdani, Anusch
Obermair, Andreas
Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
title Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
title_full Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
title_short Patient-Reported Experiences After Hysterectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Views of Over 2300 Women
title_sort patient-reported experiences after hysterectomy: a cross-sectional study of the views of over 2300 women
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821797
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373519840076
work_keys_str_mv AT jandamonika patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT armfieldnigelr patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT kerrgayle patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT kurzsuzanne patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT jacksongraeme patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT curriejason patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT pagekatie patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT weaveredward patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT yazdanianusch patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women
AT obermairandreas patientreportedexperiencesafterhysterectomyacrosssectionalstudyoftheviewsofover2300women