Cargando…

An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Bachelor students of occupational therapy are expected to work in accordance with evidence-based practice (EBP). The EBP work file, a learning tool in a Word document format, covering all steps in the EBP process, is an approach to teaching and learning EBP. The aim of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Susanne Grødem, Bruset, Else Britt, Hjelle, Kari Margrete, Mongs, Malin, Sveen, Unni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32762774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02178-2
_version_ 1783568184479055872
author Johnson, Susanne Grødem
Bruset, Else Britt
Hjelle, Kari Margrete
Mongs, Malin
Sveen, Unni
author_facet Johnson, Susanne Grødem
Bruset, Else Britt
Hjelle, Kari Margrete
Mongs, Malin
Sveen, Unni
author_sort Johnson, Susanne Grødem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bachelor students of occupational therapy are expected to work in accordance with evidence-based practice (EBP). The EBP work file, a learning tool in a Word document format, covering all steps in the EBP process, is an approach to teaching and learning EBP. The aim of this study was to examine the attitudes and behaviours of occupational therapy students’ in relation to applying evidence-based practice during their second-year clinical placement. We compared cohorts who received training in EBP work files with those who did not receive such training. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted. Five cohorts of second-year occupational therapy students took part in the study. The students answered two questionnaires, the EBP Beliefs Scale and the EBP Implementation Scale, after completing their second-year clinical placement. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics and calculation of the frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviations of all participating students’ scores across both questionnaires. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was conducted to analyse the differences between the mean totals of the questionnaires. RESULTS: In this study, 126 occupational therapy students participated (response rate = 57.3%). The students reacted positively to EBP, although few were practicing EBP. The students believed that EBP resulted in the best clinical care for patients, but they lacked confidence in their own ability to apply EBP. The students in Cohort 5, who received extra instruction and assignments via the EBP work file, rated their EBP behaviour statistically lower than the students in Cohort 1, who did not receive extra training on the EBP work file. CONCLUSIONS: Additional EBP work file assignments were insufficient in terms of supporting students in the implementation of EBP during clinical placements. It is, therefore, important to facilitate the learning strategies of EBP skills and demonstrate how students can practise this competency during clinical placements. Including clinical instructors in EBP teaching and learning seems essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7410154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74101542020-08-10 An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study Johnson, Susanne Grødem Bruset, Else Britt Hjelle, Kari Margrete Mongs, Malin Sveen, Unni BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Bachelor students of occupational therapy are expected to work in accordance with evidence-based practice (EBP). The EBP work file, a learning tool in a Word document format, covering all steps in the EBP process, is an approach to teaching and learning EBP. The aim of this study was to examine the attitudes and behaviours of occupational therapy students’ in relation to applying evidence-based practice during their second-year clinical placement. We compared cohorts who received training in EBP work files with those who did not receive such training. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional comparative study was conducted. Five cohorts of second-year occupational therapy students took part in the study. The students answered two questionnaires, the EBP Beliefs Scale and the EBP Implementation Scale, after completing their second-year clinical placement. The analysis was based on descriptive statistics and calculation of the frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviations of all participating students’ scores across both questionnaires. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was conducted to analyse the differences between the mean totals of the questionnaires. RESULTS: In this study, 126 occupational therapy students participated (response rate = 57.3%). The students reacted positively to EBP, although few were practicing EBP. The students believed that EBP resulted in the best clinical care for patients, but they lacked confidence in their own ability to apply EBP. The students in Cohort 5, who received extra instruction and assignments via the EBP work file, rated their EBP behaviour statistically lower than the students in Cohort 1, who did not receive extra training on the EBP work file. CONCLUSIONS: Additional EBP work file assignments were insufficient in terms of supporting students in the implementation of EBP during clinical placements. It is, therefore, important to facilitate the learning strategies of EBP skills and demonstrate how students can practise this competency during clinical placements. Including clinical instructors in EBP teaching and learning seems essential. BioMed Central 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7410154/ /pubmed/32762774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02178-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Johnson, Susanne Grødem
Bruset, Else Britt
Hjelle, Kari Margrete
Mongs, Malin
Sveen, Unni
An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
title An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
title_full An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
title_fullStr An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
title_short An exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
title_sort exploration of evidence-based practice work files for occupational therapy students during clinical placements: a descriptive cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32762774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02178-2
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonsusannegrødem anexplorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT brusetelsebritt anexplorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT hjellekarimargrete anexplorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT mongsmalin anexplorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT sveenunni anexplorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT johnsonsusannegrødem explorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT brusetelsebritt explorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT hjellekarimargrete explorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT mongsmalin explorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy
AT sveenunni explorationofevidencebasedpracticeworkfilesforoccupationaltherapystudentsduringclinicalplacementsadescriptivecrosssectionalstudy