Cargando…

Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?

PURPOSE: To correlate the subjective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics of the participants to the objective measurement of the ear canal acoustics. The objective ear canal acoustics is the frequency-dependent modulation of soundwaves through the ear canal. Our second objective is to design a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zwemstra, M. R., Brienesse, P., Ebbens, F. A., de Wolf, M. J. F., van Spronsen, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32335711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05971-3
_version_ 1783568266543759360
author Zwemstra, M. R.
Brienesse, P.
Ebbens, F. A.
de Wolf, M. J. F.
van Spronsen, E.
author_facet Zwemstra, M. R.
Brienesse, P.
Ebbens, F. A.
de Wolf, M. J. F.
van Spronsen, E.
author_sort Zwemstra, M. R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To correlate the subjective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics of the participants to the objective measurement of the ear canal acoustics. The objective ear canal acoustics is the frequency-dependent modulation of soundwaves through the ear canal. Our second objective is to design a model to predict the subjective quality of sound based on the altered objective ear canal acoustics. METHODS: To determine the frequency-dependent modulation of the soundwaves the real-ear unaided gain (REUG) of the ear canal is measured. 40 participants with normal hearing were presented six simulated sound fragments representing the acoustic properties of six different ear canals (REUG). These six sound fragments were built based on the difference between these six REUGs and the average REUG of a normal adult ear canal. Subjective sound quality was evaluated using a VAS score and a paired comparison score. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between the objective ear canal acoustics and the subjective assessment of the quality of sound (Spearman’s rho—0.89). Our linear mixed VAS model for individual participants has an intercept of 95.6 and a slope of − 4.2 (p < 0.001). The paired comparison analysis endorsed our findings that an increased difference in REUG is predictive for a decreased quality assessment of ear canal acoustics. CONCLUSION: There is a strong correlation between the subjective evaluation of ear canal acoustics and the objective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics. Our models show that an increased difference in REUG predicts a decreased quality of ear canal acoustics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7410856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74108562020-08-17 Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery? Zwemstra, M. R. Brienesse, P. Ebbens, F. A. de Wolf, M. J. F. van Spronsen, E. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology PURPOSE: To correlate the subjective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics of the participants to the objective measurement of the ear canal acoustics. The objective ear canal acoustics is the frequency-dependent modulation of soundwaves through the ear canal. Our second objective is to design a model to predict the subjective quality of sound based on the altered objective ear canal acoustics. METHODS: To determine the frequency-dependent modulation of the soundwaves the real-ear unaided gain (REUG) of the ear canal is measured. 40 participants with normal hearing were presented six simulated sound fragments representing the acoustic properties of six different ear canals (REUG). These six sound fragments were built based on the difference between these six REUGs and the average REUG of a normal adult ear canal. Subjective sound quality was evaluated using a VAS score and a paired comparison score. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between the objective ear canal acoustics and the subjective assessment of the quality of sound (Spearman’s rho—0.89). Our linear mixed VAS model for individual participants has an intercept of 95.6 and a slope of − 4.2 (p < 0.001). The paired comparison analysis endorsed our findings that an increased difference in REUG is predictive for a decreased quality assessment of ear canal acoustics. CONCLUSION: There is a strong correlation between the subjective evaluation of ear canal acoustics and the objective quality assessment of ear canal acoustics. Our models show that an increased difference in REUG predicts a decreased quality of ear canal acoustics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-25 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7410856/ /pubmed/32335711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05971-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Otology
Zwemstra, M. R.
Brienesse, P.
Ebbens, F. A.
de Wolf, M. J. F.
van Spronsen, E.
Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
title Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
title_full Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
title_fullStr Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
title_short Can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
title_sort can we predict the altered subjective quality assessment of sound after ear canal surgery?
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32335711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-05971-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zwemstramr canwepredictthealteredsubjectivequalityassessmentofsoundafterearcanalsurgery
AT brienessep canwepredictthealteredsubjectivequalityassessmentofsoundafterearcanalsurgery
AT ebbensfa canwepredictthealteredsubjectivequalityassessmentofsoundafterearcanalsurgery
AT dewolfmjf canwepredictthealteredsubjectivequalityassessmentofsoundafterearcanalsurgery
AT vanspronsene canwepredictthealteredsubjectivequalityassessmentofsoundafterearcanalsurgery