Cargando…
MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9 |
_version_ | 1783568267472797696 |
---|---|
author | Keil, Vera C. Borger, Valeri Purrer, Veronika Groetz, Simon F. Scheef, Lukas Boecker, Henning Schild, Hans H. Kindler, Christine Schmitt, Angelika Solymosi, Laszlo Wüllner, Ullrich Pieper, Claus C. |
author_facet | Keil, Vera C. Borger, Valeri Purrer, Veronika Groetz, Simon F. Scheef, Lukas Boecker, Henning Schild, Hans H. Kindler, Christine Schmitt, Angelika Solymosi, Laszlo Wüllner, Ullrich Pieper, Claus C. |
author_sort | Keil, Vera C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome. METHODS: MRgFUS-induced lesions and oedema were retrospectively evaluated based on DWI, SWI, T2-weighted and T1-weighted 3-T MRI data acquired 30 min and 3, 30 and 180 days after MRgFUS (n = 9 essential tremor, n = 1 Parkinson’s patients). Lesions were assessed volumetrically, visually and by ADC measurements and compared with clinical effects using non-parametric testing. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after treatment, all lesions could be identified on T2-weighted images. Immediate oedema was rare (n = 1). Lesion volume as well as oedema reached a maximum on day 3 with a mean lesion size of 0.4 ± 0.2 cm(3) and an oedema volume 3.7 ± 1.2 times the lesion volume. On day 3, a distinct diffusion-restricted rim was noted that corresponded well with SWI. Lesion shrinkage after day 3 was observed in all sequences. Lesions were no longer detectable on DWI in n = 7/10, on T2-weighted images in n = 4/10 and on T1-weighted images in n = 4/10 on day 180. No infarcts or haemorrhage were observed. There was no correlation between lesion size and initial motor skill improvement (p = 0.99). Tremor reduction dynamics correlated strongly with lesion shrinkage between days 3 and 180 (p = 0.01, R = 0.76). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cerebral MRgFUS lesions variably shrink over months. SWI is the sequence of choice to identify lesions after 6 months. Lesion volume is arguably associated with intermediate-term outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7410861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74108612020-08-17 MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective Keil, Vera C. Borger, Valeri Purrer, Veronika Groetz, Simon F. Scheef, Lukas Boecker, Henning Schild, Hans H. Kindler, Christine Schmitt, Angelika Solymosi, Laszlo Wüllner, Ullrich Pieper, Claus C. Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome. METHODS: MRgFUS-induced lesions and oedema were retrospectively evaluated based on DWI, SWI, T2-weighted and T1-weighted 3-T MRI data acquired 30 min and 3, 30 and 180 days after MRgFUS (n = 9 essential tremor, n = 1 Parkinson’s patients). Lesions were assessed volumetrically, visually and by ADC measurements and compared with clinical effects using non-parametric testing. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after treatment, all lesions could be identified on T2-weighted images. Immediate oedema was rare (n = 1). Lesion volume as well as oedema reached a maximum on day 3 with a mean lesion size of 0.4 ± 0.2 cm(3) and an oedema volume 3.7 ± 1.2 times the lesion volume. On day 3, a distinct diffusion-restricted rim was noted that corresponded well with SWI. Lesion shrinkage after day 3 was observed in all sequences. Lesions were no longer detectable on DWI in n = 7/10, on T2-weighted images in n = 4/10 and on T1-weighted images in n = 4/10 on day 180. No infarcts or haemorrhage were observed. There was no correlation between lesion size and initial motor skill improvement (p = 0.99). Tremor reduction dynamics correlated strongly with lesion shrinkage between days 3 and 180 (p = 0.01, R = 0.76). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cerebral MRgFUS lesions variably shrink over months. SWI is the sequence of choice to identify lesions after 6 months. Lesion volume is arguably associated with intermediate-term outcome. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7410861/ /pubmed/32363482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostic Neuroradiology Keil, Vera C. Borger, Valeri Purrer, Veronika Groetz, Simon F. Scheef, Lukas Boecker, Henning Schild, Hans H. Kindler, Christine Schmitt, Angelika Solymosi, Laszlo Wüllner, Ullrich Pieper, Claus C. MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
title | MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
title_full | MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
title_fullStr | MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
title_short | MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
title_sort | mri follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective |
topic | Diagnostic Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keilverac mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT borgervaleri mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT purrerveronika mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT groetzsimonf mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT scheeflukas mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT boeckerhenning mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT schildhansh mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT kindlerchristine mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT schmittangelika mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT solymosilaszlo mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT wullnerullrich mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective AT pieperclausc mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective |