Cargando…

MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keil, Vera C., Borger, Valeri, Purrer, Veronika, Groetz, Simon F., Scheef, Lukas, Boecker, Henning, Schild, Hans H., Kindler, Christine, Schmitt, Angelika, Solymosi, Laszlo, Wüllner, Ullrich, Pieper, Claus C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9
_version_ 1783568267472797696
author Keil, Vera C.
Borger, Valeri
Purrer, Veronika
Groetz, Simon F.
Scheef, Lukas
Boecker, Henning
Schild, Hans H.
Kindler, Christine
Schmitt, Angelika
Solymosi, Laszlo
Wüllner, Ullrich
Pieper, Claus C.
author_facet Keil, Vera C.
Borger, Valeri
Purrer, Veronika
Groetz, Simon F.
Scheef, Lukas
Boecker, Henning
Schild, Hans H.
Kindler, Christine
Schmitt, Angelika
Solymosi, Laszlo
Wüllner, Ullrich
Pieper, Claus C.
author_sort Keil, Vera C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome. METHODS: MRgFUS-induced lesions and oedema were retrospectively evaluated based on DWI, SWI, T2-weighted and T1-weighted 3-T MRI data acquired 30 min and 3, 30 and 180 days after MRgFUS (n = 9 essential tremor, n = 1 Parkinson’s patients). Lesions were assessed volumetrically, visually and by ADC measurements and compared with clinical effects using non-parametric testing. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after treatment, all lesions could be identified on T2-weighted images. Immediate oedema was rare (n = 1). Lesion volume as well as oedema reached a maximum on day 3 with a mean lesion size of 0.4 ± 0.2 cm(3) and an oedema volume 3.7 ± 1.2 times the lesion volume. On day 3, a distinct diffusion-restricted rim was noted that corresponded well with SWI. Lesion shrinkage after day 3 was observed in all sequences. Lesions were no longer detectable on DWI in n = 7/10, on T2-weighted images in n = 4/10 and on T1-weighted images in n = 4/10 on day 180. No infarcts or haemorrhage were observed. There was no correlation between lesion size and initial motor skill improvement (p = 0.99). Tremor reduction dynamics correlated strongly with lesion shrinkage between days 3 and 180 (p = 0.01, R = 0.76). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cerebral MRgFUS lesions variably shrink over months. SWI is the sequence of choice to identify lesions after 6 months. Lesion volume is arguably associated with intermediate-term outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7410861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74108612020-08-17 MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective Keil, Vera C. Borger, Valeri Purrer, Veronika Groetz, Simon F. Scheef, Lukas Boecker, Henning Schild, Hans H. Kindler, Christine Schmitt, Angelika Solymosi, Laszlo Wüllner, Ullrich Pieper, Claus C. Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome. METHODS: MRgFUS-induced lesions and oedema were retrospectively evaluated based on DWI, SWI, T2-weighted and T1-weighted 3-T MRI data acquired 30 min and 3, 30 and 180 days after MRgFUS (n = 9 essential tremor, n = 1 Parkinson’s patients). Lesions were assessed volumetrically, visually and by ADC measurements and compared with clinical effects using non-parametric testing. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after treatment, all lesions could be identified on T2-weighted images. Immediate oedema was rare (n = 1). Lesion volume as well as oedema reached a maximum on day 3 with a mean lesion size of 0.4 ± 0.2 cm(3) and an oedema volume 3.7 ± 1.2 times the lesion volume. On day 3, a distinct diffusion-restricted rim was noted that corresponded well with SWI. Lesion shrinkage after day 3 was observed in all sequences. Lesions were no longer detectable on DWI in n = 7/10, on T2-weighted images in n = 4/10 and on T1-weighted images in n = 4/10 on day 180. No infarcts or haemorrhage were observed. There was no correlation between lesion size and initial motor skill improvement (p = 0.99). Tremor reduction dynamics correlated strongly with lesion shrinkage between days 3 and 180 (p = 0.01, R = 0.76). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, cerebral MRgFUS lesions variably shrink over months. SWI is the sequence of choice to identify lesions after 6 months. Lesion volume is arguably associated with intermediate-term outcome. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7410861/ /pubmed/32363482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostic Neuroradiology
Keil, Vera C.
Borger, Valeri
Purrer, Veronika
Groetz, Simon F.
Scheef, Lukas
Boecker, Henning
Schild, Hans H.
Kindler, Christine
Schmitt, Angelika
Solymosi, Laszlo
Wüllner, Ullrich
Pieper, Claus C.
MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
title MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
title_full MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
title_fullStr MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
title_short MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
title_sort mri follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist’s perspective
topic Diagnostic Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9
work_keys_str_mv AT keilverac mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT borgervaleri mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT purrerveronika mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT groetzsimonf mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT scheeflukas mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT boeckerhenning mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT schildhansh mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT kindlerchristine mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT schmittangelika mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT solymosilaszlo mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT wullnerullrich mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective
AT pieperclausc mrifollowupaftermagneticresonanceguidedfocusedultrasoundfornoninvasivethalamotomytheneuroradiologistsperspective