Cargando…
Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI
Purpose: Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is an index of the dilatory function of cerebral blood vessels and has shown great promise in the diagnosis of risk factors in cerebrovascular disease. Aging is one such risk factor; thus, it is important to characterize age-related differences in CVR. CVR c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00758 |
_version_ | 1783568320312639488 |
---|---|
author | Taneja, Kamil Liu, Peiying Xu, Cuimei Turner, Monroe Zhao, Yuguang Abdelkarim, Dema Thomas, Binu P. Rypma, Bart Lu, Hanzhang |
author_facet | Taneja, Kamil Liu, Peiying Xu, Cuimei Turner, Monroe Zhao, Yuguang Abdelkarim, Dema Thomas, Binu P. Rypma, Bart Lu, Hanzhang |
author_sort | Taneja, Kamil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is an index of the dilatory function of cerebral blood vessels and has shown great promise in the diagnosis of risk factors in cerebrovascular disease. Aging is one such risk factor; thus, it is important to characterize age-related differences in CVR. CVR can be measured by BOLD MRI but few studies have measured quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF)-based CVR in the context of aging. This study aims to determine the age effect on CVR using two quantitative CBF techniques, phase-contrast (PC), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI. Methods: In 49 participants (32 younger and 17 older), CVR was measured with PC, ASL, and BOLD MRI. These CVR methods were compared across young and older groups to determine their dependence on age. PC and ASL CVR were also studied for inter-correlation and mean differences. Gray and white matter CVR values were also studied. Results: PC CVR was higher in younger participants than older participants (by 17%, p = 0.046). However, there were no age differences in ASL or BOLD CVR. ASL CVR was significantly correlated with PC CVR (p = 0.042) and BOLD CVR (p = 0.016), but its values were underestimated compared to PC CVR (p = 0.045). ASL CVR map revealed no difference between gray matter and white matter tissue types, whereas gray matter was significantly higher than white matter in the BOLD CVR map. Conclusion: This study compared two quantitative CVR techniques in the context of brain aging and revealed that PC CVR is a more sensitive method for detection of age differences, despite the absence of spatial information. The ASL method showed a significant correlation with PC and BOLD, but it tends to underestimate CVR due to confounding factors associated with this technique. Importantly, our data suggest that there is not a difference in CBF-based CVR between the gray and white matter, in contrast to previous observation using BOLD MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7411174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74111742020-08-25 Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI Taneja, Kamil Liu, Peiying Xu, Cuimei Turner, Monroe Zhao, Yuguang Abdelkarim, Dema Thomas, Binu P. Rypma, Bart Lu, Hanzhang Front Neurol Neurology Purpose: Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is an index of the dilatory function of cerebral blood vessels and has shown great promise in the diagnosis of risk factors in cerebrovascular disease. Aging is one such risk factor; thus, it is important to characterize age-related differences in CVR. CVR can be measured by BOLD MRI but few studies have measured quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF)-based CVR in the context of aging. This study aims to determine the age effect on CVR using two quantitative CBF techniques, phase-contrast (PC), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI. Methods: In 49 participants (32 younger and 17 older), CVR was measured with PC, ASL, and BOLD MRI. These CVR methods were compared across young and older groups to determine their dependence on age. PC and ASL CVR were also studied for inter-correlation and mean differences. Gray and white matter CVR values were also studied. Results: PC CVR was higher in younger participants than older participants (by 17%, p = 0.046). However, there were no age differences in ASL or BOLD CVR. ASL CVR was significantly correlated with PC CVR (p = 0.042) and BOLD CVR (p = 0.016), but its values were underestimated compared to PC CVR (p = 0.045). ASL CVR map revealed no difference between gray matter and white matter tissue types, whereas gray matter was significantly higher than white matter in the BOLD CVR map. Conclusion: This study compared two quantitative CVR techniques in the context of brain aging and revealed that PC CVR is a more sensitive method for detection of age differences, despite the absence of spatial information. The ASL method showed a significant correlation with PC and BOLD, but it tends to underestimate CVR due to confounding factors associated with this technique. Importantly, our data suggest that there is not a difference in CBF-based CVR between the gray and white matter, in contrast to previous observation using BOLD MRI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7411174/ /pubmed/32849217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00758 Text en Copyright © 2020 Taneja, Liu, Xu, Turner, Zhao, Abdelkarim, Thomas, Rypma and Lu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Taneja, Kamil Liu, Peiying Xu, Cuimei Turner, Monroe Zhao, Yuguang Abdelkarim, Dema Thomas, Binu P. Rypma, Bart Lu, Hanzhang Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI |
title | Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI |
title_full | Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI |
title_short | Quantitative Cerebrovascular Reactivity in Normal Aging: Comparison Between Phase-Contrast and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI |
title_sort | quantitative cerebrovascular reactivity in normal aging: comparison between phase-contrast and arterial spin labeling mri |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00758 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanejakamil quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT liupeiying quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT xucuimei quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT turnermonroe quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT zhaoyuguang quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT abdelkarimdema quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT thomasbinup quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT rypmabart quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri AT luhanzhang quantitativecerebrovascularreactivityinnormalagingcomparisonbetweenphasecontrastandarterialspinlabelingmri |