Cargando…

The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) traditionally requires the use of circular mapping catheter (CMC) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a CMC‐free approach for AF ablation performed by a contiguous optimized (CL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chin, Shui Hao, O'Brien, Jim, Epicoco, Gianluca, Peddinti, Prithvi, Gupta, Akanksha, Modi, Simon, Waktare, Johan, Snowdon, Richard, Gupta, Dhiraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12390
_version_ 1783568334915108864
author Chin, Shui Hao
O'Brien, Jim
Epicoco, Gianluca
Peddinti, Prithvi
Gupta, Akanksha
Modi, Simon
Waktare, Johan
Snowdon, Richard
Gupta, Dhiraj
author_facet Chin, Shui Hao
O'Brien, Jim
Epicoco, Gianluca
Peddinti, Prithvi
Gupta, Akanksha
Modi, Simon
Waktare, Johan
Snowdon, Richard
Gupta, Dhiraj
author_sort Chin, Shui Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) traditionally requires the use of circular mapping catheter (CMC) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a CMC‐free approach for AF ablation performed by a contiguous optimized (CLOSE) ablation protocol. METHODS: A CLOSE‐guided and CMC‐free PVI protocol with a single transseptal puncture was attempted in 67 patients with AF. Left atrial (LA) CARTO voltage mapping was performed with the ablation catheter pre‐ and postablation to demonstrate entry block into the pulmonary veins, and pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. RESULTS: The CMC‐free approach was successful in achieving PVI in 66 (98.5%) cases, with procedure time of 148 ± 32 minutes, ablation time of 27.5 ± 5.7 minutes, and fluoroscopy time of 7.8 ± 1.0 minutes. First‐pass PVI was seen in 58(86.5%) patients, and pacing maneuvers successfully identified the residual gap in eight of the other nine cases. No complication was observed. At 12 months follow‐up, 60 (89.6%) patients remained free from AF. The CMC‐free approach resulted in a cost saving of £47,190. CONCLUSION: A CMC‐free CLOSE‐guided PVI approach is feasible, safe, and cost‐saving, and is associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7411237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74112372020-08-10 The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation Chin, Shui Hao O'Brien, Jim Epicoco, Gianluca Peddinti, Prithvi Gupta, Akanksha Modi, Simon Waktare, Johan Snowdon, Richard Gupta, Dhiraj J Arrhythm Original Articles BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) traditionally requires the use of circular mapping catheter (CMC) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a CMC‐free approach for AF ablation performed by a contiguous optimized (CLOSE) ablation protocol. METHODS: A CLOSE‐guided and CMC‐free PVI protocol with a single transseptal puncture was attempted in 67 patients with AF. Left atrial (LA) CARTO voltage mapping was performed with the ablation catheter pre‐ and postablation to demonstrate entry block into the pulmonary veins, and pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. RESULTS: The CMC‐free approach was successful in achieving PVI in 66 (98.5%) cases, with procedure time of 148 ± 32 minutes, ablation time of 27.5 ± 5.7 minutes, and fluoroscopy time of 7.8 ± 1.0 minutes. First‐pass PVI was seen in 58(86.5%) patients, and pacing maneuvers successfully identified the residual gap in eight of the other nine cases. No complication was observed. At 12 months follow‐up, 60 (89.6%) patients remained free from AF. The CMC‐free approach resulted in a cost saving of £47,190. CONCLUSION: A CMC‐free CLOSE‐guided PVI approach is feasible, safe, and cost‐saving, and is associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7411237/ /pubmed/32782640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12390 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chin, Shui Hao
O'Brien, Jim
Epicoco, Gianluca
Peddinti, Prithvi
Gupta, Akanksha
Modi, Simon
Waktare, Johan
Snowdon, Richard
Gupta, Dhiraj
The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
title The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
title_full The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
title_fullStr The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
title_short The feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
title_sort feasibility and effectiveness of a streamlined single‐catheter approach for radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12390
work_keys_str_mv AT chinshuihao thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT obrienjim thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT epicocogianluca thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT peddintiprithvi thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT guptaakanksha thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT modisimon thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT waktarejohan thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT snowdonrichard thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT guptadhiraj thefeasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT chinshuihao feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT obrienjim feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT epicocogianluca feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT peddintiprithvi feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT guptaakanksha feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT modisimon feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT waktarejohan feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT snowdonrichard feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation
AT guptadhiraj feasibilityandeffectivenessofastreamlinedsinglecatheterapproachforradiofrequencyatrialfibrillationablation