Cargando…

Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the risks in confronting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the ongoing lockdown effectiveness in each of Italy, Germany, Spain, France, and the United States using China’s lockdown model simulation, and cases forecast until the plate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amer, Faten, Hammoud, Sahar, Farran, Bashar, Boncz, Imre, Endrei, Dóra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.217
_version_ 1783568380863709184
author Amer, Faten
Hammoud, Sahar
Farran, Bashar
Boncz, Imre
Endrei, Dóra
author_facet Amer, Faten
Hammoud, Sahar
Farran, Bashar
Boncz, Imre
Endrei, Dóra
author_sort Amer, Faten
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the risks in confronting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the ongoing lockdown effectiveness in each of Italy, Germany, Spain, France, and the United States using China’s lockdown model simulation, and cases forecast until the plateau phase. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative historical data analysis. Total Risk Assessment (TRA) evaluation tool was used to assess the pre-pandemic stage risks, pandemic threshold fast responsiveness, and the ongoing performance until plateau. The Infected Patient Ratio (IPR) tool was developed to measure the number of patients resulting from 1 infector during the incubation period. Both IPR and TRA were used together to forecast inflection points, plateau phases, intensive care units’ and ventilators’ breakpoints, and the Total Fatality Ratio. RESULTS: In Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and the United States, an inflection point is predicted within the first 15 d of April, to arrive at a plateau after another 30 to 80 d. Variations in IPR drop are expected due to variations in lockdown timing by each country, the extent of adherence to it, and the number of performed tests in each. CONCLUSIONS: Both qualitative (TRA) and quantitative (IPR) tools can be used together for assessing and minimizing the pandemic risks and for more precise forecasting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7411444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74114442020-08-10 Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19 Amer, Faten Hammoud, Sahar Farran, Bashar Boncz, Imre Endrei, Dóra Disaster Med Public Health Prep Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the risks in confronting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the ongoing lockdown effectiveness in each of Italy, Germany, Spain, France, and the United States using China’s lockdown model simulation, and cases forecast until the plateau phase. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative historical data analysis. Total Risk Assessment (TRA) evaluation tool was used to assess the pre-pandemic stage risks, pandemic threshold fast responsiveness, and the ongoing performance until plateau. The Infected Patient Ratio (IPR) tool was developed to measure the number of patients resulting from 1 infector during the incubation period. Both IPR and TRA were used together to forecast inflection points, plateau phases, intensive care units’ and ventilators’ breakpoints, and the Total Fatality Ratio. RESULTS: In Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and the United States, an inflection point is predicted within the first 15 d of April, to arrive at a plateau after another 30 to 80 d. Variations in IPR drop are expected due to variations in lockdown timing by each country, the extent of adherence to it, and the number of performed tests in each. CONCLUSIONS: Both qualitative (TRA) and quantitative (IPR) tools can be used together for assessing and minimizing the pandemic risks and for more precise forecasting. Cambridge University Press 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7411444/ /pubmed/32576332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.217 Text en © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Amer, Faten
Hammoud, Sahar
Farran, Bashar
Boncz, Imre
Endrei, Dóra
Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19
title Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19
title_full Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19
title_fullStr Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19
title_short Assessment of Countries’ Preparedness and Lockdown Effectiveness in Fighting COVID-19
title_sort assessment of countries’ preparedness and lockdown effectiveness in fighting covid-19
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2020.217
work_keys_str_mv AT amerfaten assessmentofcountriespreparednessandlockdowneffectivenessinfightingcovid19
AT hammoudsahar assessmentofcountriespreparednessandlockdowneffectivenessinfightingcovid19
AT farranbashar assessmentofcountriespreparednessandlockdowneffectivenessinfightingcovid19
AT bonczimre assessmentofcountriespreparednessandlockdowneffectivenessinfightingcovid19
AT endreidora assessmentofcountriespreparednessandlockdowneffectivenessinfightingcovid19