Cargando…
Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein
The influenza A virus (IAV) matrix-2 (M2) protein is an antigenically conserved viral envelope protein that plays an important role in virus budding together with another envelope protein, hemagglutinin (HA). An M2-specific mouse monoclonal IgG antibody, rM2ss23, which binds to the ectodomain of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12070780 |
_version_ | 1783568413761732608 |
---|---|
author | Okuya, Kosuke Eguchi, Nao Manzoor, Rashid Yoshida, Reiko Saito, Shinji Suzuki, Tadaki Sasaki, Michihito Saito, Takeshi Kida, Yurie Mori-Kajihara, Akina Miyamoto, Hiroko Ichii, Osamu Kajihara, Masahiro Higashi, Hideaki Takada, Ayato |
author_facet | Okuya, Kosuke Eguchi, Nao Manzoor, Rashid Yoshida, Reiko Saito, Shinji Suzuki, Tadaki Sasaki, Michihito Saito, Takeshi Kida, Yurie Mori-Kajihara, Akina Miyamoto, Hiroko Ichii, Osamu Kajihara, Masahiro Higashi, Hideaki Takada, Ayato |
author_sort | Okuya, Kosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | The influenza A virus (IAV) matrix-2 (M2) protein is an antigenically conserved viral envelope protein that plays an important role in virus budding together with another envelope protein, hemagglutinin (HA). An M2-specific mouse monoclonal IgG antibody, rM2ss23, which binds to the ectodomain of the M2 protein, has been shown to be a non-neutralizing antibody, but inhibits plaque formation of IAV strains. In this study, we generated chimeric rM2ss23 (ch-rM2ss23) IgG and IgA antibodies with the same variable region and compared their antiviral activities. Using gel chromatography, ch-rM2ss23 IgA were divided into three antibody subsets: monomeric IgA (m-IgA), dimeric IgA (d-IgA), and trimeric and tetrameric IgA (t/q-IgA). We found that t/q-IgA had a significantly higher capacity to reduce the plaque size of IAVs than IgG and m-IgA, most likely due to the decreased number of progeny virus particles produced from infected cells. Interestingly, HA-M2 colocalization was remarkably reduced on the infected cell surface in the presence of ch-rM2ss23 antibodies. These results indicate that anti-M2 polymeric IgA restricts IAV budding more efficiently than IgG and suggest a role of anti-M2 IgA in cross-protective immunity to IAVs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7411592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74115922020-08-17 Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein Okuya, Kosuke Eguchi, Nao Manzoor, Rashid Yoshida, Reiko Saito, Shinji Suzuki, Tadaki Sasaki, Michihito Saito, Takeshi Kida, Yurie Mori-Kajihara, Akina Miyamoto, Hiroko Ichii, Osamu Kajihara, Masahiro Higashi, Hideaki Takada, Ayato Viruses Article The influenza A virus (IAV) matrix-2 (M2) protein is an antigenically conserved viral envelope protein that plays an important role in virus budding together with another envelope protein, hemagglutinin (HA). An M2-specific mouse monoclonal IgG antibody, rM2ss23, which binds to the ectodomain of the M2 protein, has been shown to be a non-neutralizing antibody, but inhibits plaque formation of IAV strains. In this study, we generated chimeric rM2ss23 (ch-rM2ss23) IgG and IgA antibodies with the same variable region and compared their antiviral activities. Using gel chromatography, ch-rM2ss23 IgA were divided into three antibody subsets: monomeric IgA (m-IgA), dimeric IgA (d-IgA), and trimeric and tetrameric IgA (t/q-IgA). We found that t/q-IgA had a significantly higher capacity to reduce the plaque size of IAVs than IgG and m-IgA, most likely due to the decreased number of progeny virus particles produced from infected cells. Interestingly, HA-M2 colocalization was remarkably reduced on the infected cell surface in the presence of ch-rM2ss23 antibodies. These results indicate that anti-M2 polymeric IgA restricts IAV budding more efficiently than IgG and suggest a role of anti-M2 IgA in cross-protective immunity to IAVs. MDPI 2020-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7411592/ /pubmed/32698456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12070780 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Okuya, Kosuke Eguchi, Nao Manzoor, Rashid Yoshida, Reiko Saito, Shinji Suzuki, Tadaki Sasaki, Michihito Saito, Takeshi Kida, Yurie Mori-Kajihara, Akina Miyamoto, Hiroko Ichii, Osamu Kajihara, Masahiro Higashi, Hideaki Takada, Ayato Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein |
title | Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein |
title_full | Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein |
title_short | Comparative Analyses of the Antiviral Activities of IgG and IgA Antibodies to Influenza A Virus M2 Protein |
title_sort | comparative analyses of the antiviral activities of igg and iga antibodies to influenza a virus m2 protein |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698456 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12070780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okuyakosuke comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT eguchinao comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT manzoorrashid comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT yoshidareiko comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT saitoshinji comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT suzukitadaki comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT sasakimichihito comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT saitotakeshi comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT kidayurie comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT morikajiharaakina comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT miyamotohiroko comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT ichiiosamu comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT kajiharamasahiro comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT higashihideaki comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein AT takadaayato comparativeanalysesoftheantiviralactivitiesofiggandigaantibodiestoinfluenzaavirusm2protein |