Cargando…

Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: There is limited information on the effect of the connection between subcrestally placed implants and abutments on marginal bone levels. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate marginal bone levels after definitive prosthesis delivery around implants with an internal 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lops, Diego, Stocchero, Michele, Motta Jones, Jason, Freni, Alessandro, Palazzolo, Antonino, Romeo, Eugenio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32668745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143123
_version_ 1783568437061091328
author Lops, Diego
Stocchero, Michele
Motta Jones, Jason
Freni, Alessandro
Palazzolo, Antonino
Romeo, Eugenio
author_facet Lops, Diego
Stocchero, Michele
Motta Jones, Jason
Freni, Alessandro
Palazzolo, Antonino
Romeo, Eugenio
author_sort Lops, Diego
collection PubMed
description Background: There is limited information on the effect of the connection between subcrestally placed implants and abutments on marginal bone levels. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate marginal bone levels after definitive prosthesis delivery around implants with an internal 5° conical connection placed in a subcrestal position. Materials and methods: Patients treated with fixed prostheses supported by implants placed at a subcrestal level between 2012 and 2018 were recalled for a follow-up examination. All implants had 5° internal conical connection with platform switching. Radiographic marginal bone level (MBL) was measured. MBL change between prosthetic delivery (t(0)) and follow-up examination (t(1)) was calculated. A multiple regression model was performed to identify the most significant predictors on MBL change. Results: Ninety-three patients and 410 implants, with a mean follow-up of 2.72 ± 1.31 years, were examined. Mean MBL was −1.09 ± 0.65 mm and −1.00 ± 0.37 mm at t(0) and t(1), respectively, with a mean bone remodeling of 0.09 ± 0.68 mm. An implant’s vertical position in relation to the bone crest, the year of follow up and the presence of type-2 controlled diabetes were demonstrated to be influencing factors for MBL modifications. Conclusions: Subcrestally placed implants with platform switching and internal conical connection maintained stable bone levels over a mean follow-up of more than 2 years. How a tight internal conical connection between abutment and implant may contribute to this clinical evidence should be more deeply investigated. MBL variations seem to be mostly influenced by an implant’s vertical position and presence of type-2 controlled diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7411692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74116922020-08-25 Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis Lops, Diego Stocchero, Michele Motta Jones, Jason Freni, Alessandro Palazzolo, Antonino Romeo, Eugenio Materials (Basel) Article Background: There is limited information on the effect of the connection between subcrestally placed implants and abutments on marginal bone levels. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate marginal bone levels after definitive prosthesis delivery around implants with an internal 5° conical connection placed in a subcrestal position. Materials and methods: Patients treated with fixed prostheses supported by implants placed at a subcrestal level between 2012 and 2018 were recalled for a follow-up examination. All implants had 5° internal conical connection with platform switching. Radiographic marginal bone level (MBL) was measured. MBL change between prosthetic delivery (t(0)) and follow-up examination (t(1)) was calculated. A multiple regression model was performed to identify the most significant predictors on MBL change. Results: Ninety-three patients and 410 implants, with a mean follow-up of 2.72 ± 1.31 years, were examined. Mean MBL was −1.09 ± 0.65 mm and −1.00 ± 0.37 mm at t(0) and t(1), respectively, with a mean bone remodeling of 0.09 ± 0.68 mm. An implant’s vertical position in relation to the bone crest, the year of follow up and the presence of type-2 controlled diabetes were demonstrated to be influencing factors for MBL modifications. Conclusions: Subcrestally placed implants with platform switching and internal conical connection maintained stable bone levels over a mean follow-up of more than 2 years. How a tight internal conical connection between abutment and implant may contribute to this clinical evidence should be more deeply investigated. MBL variations seem to be mostly influenced by an implant’s vertical position and presence of type-2 controlled diabetes. MDPI 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7411692/ /pubmed/32668745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143123 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lops, Diego
Stocchero, Michele
Motta Jones, Jason
Freni, Alessandro
Palazzolo, Antonino
Romeo, Eugenio
Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis
title Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis
title_fullStr Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis
title_short Five Degree Internal Conical Connection and Marginal Bone Stability around Subcrestal Implants: A Retrospective Analysis
title_sort five degree internal conical connection and marginal bone stability around subcrestal implants: a retrospective analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32668745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143123
work_keys_str_mv AT lopsdiego fivedegreeinternalconicalconnectionandmarginalbonestabilityaroundsubcrestalimplantsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT stoccheromichele fivedegreeinternalconicalconnectionandmarginalbonestabilityaroundsubcrestalimplantsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT mottajonesjason fivedegreeinternalconicalconnectionandmarginalbonestabilityaroundsubcrestalimplantsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT frenialessandro fivedegreeinternalconicalconnectionandmarginalbonestabilityaroundsubcrestalimplantsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT palazzoloantonino fivedegreeinternalconicalconnectionandmarginalbonestabilityaroundsubcrestalimplantsaretrospectiveanalysis
AT romeoeugenio fivedegreeinternalconicalconnectionandmarginalbonestabilityaroundsubcrestalimplantsaretrospectiveanalysis