Cargando…
Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
Carbon Fibres (CFs) are widely used in textile-reinforced composites for the construction of lightweight, durable structures. Since their inert surface does not allow effective bonding with the matrix material, the surface treatment of fibres is suggested to improve the adhesion between the two. In...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143136 |
_version_ | 1783568441948504064 |
---|---|
author | Semitekolos, Dionisis Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora Husarova, Iryna Man’ko, Tamara Potapov, Aleksandr Romenskaya, Olga Liang, Yana Li, Xiaoying Giorcelli, Mauro Dong, Hanshan Tagliaferro, Alberto Charitidis, Costas A. |
author_facet | Semitekolos, Dionisis Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora Husarova, Iryna Man’ko, Tamara Potapov, Aleksandr Romenskaya, Olga Liang, Yana Li, Xiaoying Giorcelli, Mauro Dong, Hanshan Tagliaferro, Alberto Charitidis, Costas A. |
author_sort | Semitekolos, Dionisis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbon Fibres (CFs) are widely used in textile-reinforced composites for the construction of lightweight, durable structures. Since their inert surface does not allow effective bonding with the matrix material, the surface treatment of fibres is suggested to improve the adhesion between the two. In the present study, different surface modifications are compared in terms of the mechanical enhancement that they can offer to the fibres. Two main advanced technologies have been investigated; namely, plasma treatment and electrochemical treatment. Specifically, active screen plasma and low-pressure plasma were compared. Regarding the electrochemical modification, electrochemical oxidation and electropolymerisation of monomer solutions of acrylic and methacrylic acids, acrylonitrile and N-vinyl pyrrolidine were tested for HTA-40 CFs. In order to assess the effects of the surface treatments, the morphology, the physicochemical properties, as well as the mechanical integrity of the fibres were investigated. The CF surface and polymeric matrix interphase adhesion in composites were also analysed. The improvement of the carbon fibre’s physical–mechanical properties was evident for the case of the active screen plasma treatment and the electrochemical oxidation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7411713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74117132020-08-25 Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres Semitekolos, Dionisis Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora Husarova, Iryna Man’ko, Tamara Potapov, Aleksandr Romenskaya, Olga Liang, Yana Li, Xiaoying Giorcelli, Mauro Dong, Hanshan Tagliaferro, Alberto Charitidis, Costas A. Materials (Basel) Article Carbon Fibres (CFs) are widely used in textile-reinforced composites for the construction of lightweight, durable structures. Since their inert surface does not allow effective bonding with the matrix material, the surface treatment of fibres is suggested to improve the adhesion between the two. In the present study, different surface modifications are compared in terms of the mechanical enhancement that they can offer to the fibres. Two main advanced technologies have been investigated; namely, plasma treatment and electrochemical treatment. Specifically, active screen plasma and low-pressure plasma were compared. Regarding the electrochemical modification, electrochemical oxidation and electropolymerisation of monomer solutions of acrylic and methacrylic acids, acrylonitrile and N-vinyl pyrrolidine were tested for HTA-40 CFs. In order to assess the effects of the surface treatments, the morphology, the physicochemical properties, as well as the mechanical integrity of the fibres were investigated. The CF surface and polymeric matrix interphase adhesion in composites were also analysed. The improvement of the carbon fibre’s physical–mechanical properties was evident for the case of the active screen plasma treatment and the electrochemical oxidation. MDPI 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7411713/ /pubmed/32674389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143136 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Semitekolos, Dionisis Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora Husarova, Iryna Man’ko, Tamara Potapov, Aleksandr Romenskaya, Olga Liang, Yana Li, Xiaoying Giorcelli, Mauro Dong, Hanshan Tagliaferro, Alberto Charitidis, Costas A. Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres |
title | Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres |
title_full | Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres |
title_fullStr | Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres |
title_short | Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres |
title_sort | comparative physical–mechanical properties assessment of tailored surface-treated carbon fibres |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT semitekolosdionisis comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT trompetaaikateriniflora comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT husarovairyna comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT mankotamara comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT potapovaleksandr comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT romenskayaolga comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT liangyana comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT lixiaoying comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT giorcellimauro comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT donghanshan comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT tagliaferroalberto comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres AT charitidiscostasa comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres |