Cargando…

Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres

Carbon Fibres (CFs) are widely used in textile-reinforced composites for the construction of lightweight, durable structures. Since their inert surface does not allow effective bonding with the matrix material, the surface treatment of fibres is suggested to improve the adhesion between the two. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Semitekolos, Dionisis, Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora, Husarova, Iryna, Man’ko, Tamara, Potapov, Aleksandr, Romenskaya, Olga, Liang, Yana, Li, Xiaoying, Giorcelli, Mauro, Dong, Hanshan, Tagliaferro, Alberto, Charitidis, Costas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143136
_version_ 1783568441948504064
author Semitekolos, Dionisis
Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora
Husarova, Iryna
Man’ko, Tamara
Potapov, Aleksandr
Romenskaya, Olga
Liang, Yana
Li, Xiaoying
Giorcelli, Mauro
Dong, Hanshan
Tagliaferro, Alberto
Charitidis, Costas A.
author_facet Semitekolos, Dionisis
Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora
Husarova, Iryna
Man’ko, Tamara
Potapov, Aleksandr
Romenskaya, Olga
Liang, Yana
Li, Xiaoying
Giorcelli, Mauro
Dong, Hanshan
Tagliaferro, Alberto
Charitidis, Costas A.
author_sort Semitekolos, Dionisis
collection PubMed
description Carbon Fibres (CFs) are widely used in textile-reinforced composites for the construction of lightweight, durable structures. Since their inert surface does not allow effective bonding with the matrix material, the surface treatment of fibres is suggested to improve the adhesion between the two. In the present study, different surface modifications are compared in terms of the mechanical enhancement that they can offer to the fibres. Two main advanced technologies have been investigated; namely, plasma treatment and electrochemical treatment. Specifically, active screen plasma and low-pressure plasma were compared. Regarding the electrochemical modification, electrochemical oxidation and electropolymerisation of monomer solutions of acrylic and methacrylic acids, acrylonitrile and N-vinyl pyrrolidine were tested for HTA-40 CFs. In order to assess the effects of the surface treatments, the morphology, the physicochemical properties, as well as the mechanical integrity of the fibres were investigated. The CF surface and polymeric matrix interphase adhesion in composites were also analysed. The improvement of the carbon fibre’s physical–mechanical properties was evident for the case of the active screen plasma treatment and the electrochemical oxidation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7411713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74117132020-08-25 Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres Semitekolos, Dionisis Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora Husarova, Iryna Man’ko, Tamara Potapov, Aleksandr Romenskaya, Olga Liang, Yana Li, Xiaoying Giorcelli, Mauro Dong, Hanshan Tagliaferro, Alberto Charitidis, Costas A. Materials (Basel) Article Carbon Fibres (CFs) are widely used in textile-reinforced composites for the construction of lightweight, durable structures. Since their inert surface does not allow effective bonding with the matrix material, the surface treatment of fibres is suggested to improve the adhesion between the two. In the present study, different surface modifications are compared in terms of the mechanical enhancement that they can offer to the fibres. Two main advanced technologies have been investigated; namely, plasma treatment and electrochemical treatment. Specifically, active screen plasma and low-pressure plasma were compared. Regarding the electrochemical modification, electrochemical oxidation and electropolymerisation of monomer solutions of acrylic and methacrylic acids, acrylonitrile and N-vinyl pyrrolidine were tested for HTA-40 CFs. In order to assess the effects of the surface treatments, the morphology, the physicochemical properties, as well as the mechanical integrity of the fibres were investigated. The CF surface and polymeric matrix interphase adhesion in composites were also analysed. The improvement of the carbon fibre’s physical–mechanical properties was evident for the case of the active screen plasma treatment and the electrochemical oxidation. MDPI 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7411713/ /pubmed/32674389 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143136 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Semitekolos, Dionisis
Trompeta, Aikaterini-Flora
Husarova, Iryna
Man’ko, Tamara
Potapov, Aleksandr
Romenskaya, Olga
Liang, Yana
Li, Xiaoying
Giorcelli, Mauro
Dong, Hanshan
Tagliaferro, Alberto
Charitidis, Costas A.
Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
title Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
title_full Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
title_fullStr Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
title_short Comparative Physical–Mechanical Properties Assessment of Tailored Surface-Treated Carbon Fibres
title_sort comparative physical–mechanical properties assessment of tailored surface-treated carbon fibres
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7411713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674389
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma13143136
work_keys_str_mv AT semitekolosdionisis comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT trompetaaikateriniflora comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT husarovairyna comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT mankotamara comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT potapovaleksandr comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT romenskayaolga comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT liangyana comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT lixiaoying comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT giorcellimauro comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT donghanshan comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT tagliaferroalberto comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres
AT charitidiscostasa comparativephysicalmechanicalpropertiesassessmentoftailoredsurfacetreatedcarbonfibres