Cargando…

Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process

Sanitary landfill leachates usually have characteristics that depend on the region where they are generated and according to the age of the landfill, which is why a unique treatment for their sanitation has not been found. However, the adsorption preceded by the Fenton process has been proven to be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: San-Pedro, Liliana, Méndez-Novelo, Roger, Hernández-Núñez, Emanuel, Flota-Bañuelos, Manuel, Medina, Jorge, Giacomán-Vallejos, Germán
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133023
_version_ 1783568510315659264
author San-Pedro, Liliana
Méndez-Novelo, Roger
Hernández-Núñez, Emanuel
Flota-Bañuelos, Manuel
Medina, Jorge
Giacomán-Vallejos, Germán
author_facet San-Pedro, Liliana
Méndez-Novelo, Roger
Hernández-Núñez, Emanuel
Flota-Bañuelos, Manuel
Medina, Jorge
Giacomán-Vallejos, Germán
author_sort San-Pedro, Liliana
collection PubMed
description Sanitary landfill leachates usually have characteristics that depend on the region where they are generated and according to the age of the landfill, which is why a unique treatment for their sanitation has not been found. However, the adsorption preceded by the Fenton process has been proven to be highly efficient at removing contaminants. In this study, the adsorptive capacity of two types of activated carbon, granular and powdered, was analyzed to determine which was more efficient in the adsorption stage in the Fenton-adsorption process. Likewise, its behavior was analyzed using three isotherm models (Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin), testing the raw leachate and the Fenton-treated one with both carbons. The adsorption that is carried out on the carbons is better adjusted to the Freundlich and Temkin models. It concludes that multilayers, through the physical adsorption, carry out the adsorption of pollutants on the surface of the carbons. The results show that, statistically, granular activated carbon is more efficient at removing chemical oxygen demand (COD), and powdered activated carbon removes color better. Finally, an adsorption column was designed for the Fenton-adsorption process that was able to remove 21.68 kgCOD/kg carbon. Removal efficiencies for color and COD were >99%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7412014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74120142020-08-25 Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process San-Pedro, Liliana Méndez-Novelo, Roger Hernández-Núñez, Emanuel Flota-Bañuelos, Manuel Medina, Jorge Giacomán-Vallejos, Germán Molecules Article Sanitary landfill leachates usually have characteristics that depend on the region where they are generated and according to the age of the landfill, which is why a unique treatment for their sanitation has not been found. However, the adsorption preceded by the Fenton process has been proven to be highly efficient at removing contaminants. In this study, the adsorptive capacity of two types of activated carbon, granular and powdered, was analyzed to determine which was more efficient in the adsorption stage in the Fenton-adsorption process. Likewise, its behavior was analyzed using three isotherm models (Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin), testing the raw leachate and the Fenton-treated one with both carbons. The adsorption that is carried out on the carbons is better adjusted to the Freundlich and Temkin models. It concludes that multilayers, through the physical adsorption, carry out the adsorption of pollutants on the surface of the carbons. The results show that, statistically, granular activated carbon is more efficient at removing chemical oxygen demand (COD), and powdered activated carbon removes color better. Finally, an adsorption column was designed for the Fenton-adsorption process that was able to remove 21.68 kgCOD/kg carbon. Removal efficiencies for color and COD were >99%. MDPI 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7412014/ /pubmed/32630656 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133023 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
San-Pedro, Liliana
Méndez-Novelo, Roger
Hernández-Núñez, Emanuel
Flota-Bañuelos, Manuel
Medina, Jorge
Giacomán-Vallejos, Germán
Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process
title Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process
title_full Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process
title_fullStr Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process
title_full_unstemmed Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process
title_short Selection of the Activated Carbon Type for the Treatment of Landfill Leachate by Fenton-Adsorption Process
title_sort selection of the activated carbon type for the treatment of landfill leachate by fenton-adsorption process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630656
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133023
work_keys_str_mv AT sanpedroliliana selectionoftheactivatedcarbontypeforthetreatmentoflandfillleachatebyfentonadsorptionprocess
AT mendeznoveloroger selectionoftheactivatedcarbontypeforthetreatmentoflandfillleachatebyfentonadsorptionprocess
AT hernandeznunezemanuel selectionoftheactivatedcarbontypeforthetreatmentoflandfillleachatebyfentonadsorptionprocess
AT flotabanuelosmanuel selectionoftheactivatedcarbontypeforthetreatmentoflandfillleachatebyfentonadsorptionprocess
AT medinajorge selectionoftheactivatedcarbontypeforthetreatmentoflandfillleachatebyfentonadsorptionprocess
AT giacomanvallejosgerman selectionoftheactivatedcarbontypeforthetreatmentoflandfillleachatebyfentonadsorptionprocess