Cargando…
The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is still a challenging issue, and inconsistent results have been reported in different studies. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the relationship between MetS and BE. METHODS: In this study, w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01267-2 |
_version_ | 1783568691645906944 |
---|---|
author | Karimian, Mohammad Salamati, Majid Azami, Milad |
author_facet | Karimian, Mohammad Salamati, Majid Azami, Milad |
author_sort | Karimian, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is still a challenging issue, and inconsistent results have been reported in different studies. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the relationship between MetS and BE. METHODS: In this study, we followed the MOOSE protocol and results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. All study steps were performed independently by two authors. If necessary, the dispute was resolved by consultation with a third author. The search strategy is designed to find published studies. Comprehensive search was done in the following databases until July 2019: Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EBSCO, and Google Scholar search engine. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Ver.2, while p-value lower than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 14 studies with a sample size of 108,416, MetS significantly increased the risk of BE (OR = 1.354; 95% CI: 1.145–1.600; P < 0.001; Heterogeneity: I(2) = 81.95%; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis by omitting one study showed that overall estimates are still robust. Subgroup analysis was significant for continent (P < 0.001) and MetS diagnostic criteria (P = 0.043), but was not significant for variables of study type (P = 0.899), study setting (P = 0.115), control groups (P = 0.671) and quality of studies (P = 0.603). The Begg (P = 0.912) and Egger’s (P = 0.094) tests were not significant; therefore, the publication bias did not play a role in the results. CONCLUSION: MetS increases the risk of BE compared to control groups. The results of this study can help health practitioners by identifying a treatable risk factor for the most important risk factor for esophageal carcinoma (ie, BE). Future studies should examine whether treatment for MetS reduces the risk of BE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7412848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74128482020-08-10 The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Karimian, Mohammad Salamati, Majid Azami, Milad BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: The relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is still a challenging issue, and inconsistent results have been reported in different studies. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the relationship between MetS and BE. METHODS: In this study, we followed the MOOSE protocol and results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. All study steps were performed independently by two authors. If necessary, the dispute was resolved by consultation with a third author. The search strategy is designed to find published studies. Comprehensive search was done in the following databases until July 2019: Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EBSCO, and Google Scholar search engine. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Ver.2, while p-value lower than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 14 studies with a sample size of 108,416, MetS significantly increased the risk of BE (OR = 1.354; 95% CI: 1.145–1.600; P < 0.001; Heterogeneity: I(2) = 81.95%; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis by omitting one study showed that overall estimates are still robust. Subgroup analysis was significant for continent (P < 0.001) and MetS diagnostic criteria (P = 0.043), but was not significant for variables of study type (P = 0.899), study setting (P = 0.115), control groups (P = 0.671) and quality of studies (P = 0.603). The Begg (P = 0.912) and Egger’s (P = 0.094) tests were not significant; therefore, the publication bias did not play a role in the results. CONCLUSION: MetS increases the risk of BE compared to control groups. The results of this study can help health practitioners by identifying a treatable risk factor for the most important risk factor for esophageal carcinoma (ie, BE). Future studies should examine whether treatment for MetS reduces the risk of BE. BioMed Central 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7412848/ /pubmed/32375671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01267-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Karimian, Mohammad Salamati, Majid Azami, Milad The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of barrett’s esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7412848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32375671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01267-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karimianmohammad therelationshipbetweenmetabolicsyndromeandincreasedriskofbarrettsesophagusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salamatimajid therelationshipbetweenmetabolicsyndromeandincreasedriskofbarrettsesophagusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT azamimilad therelationshipbetweenmetabolicsyndromeandincreasedriskofbarrettsesophagusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT karimianmohammad relationshipbetweenmetabolicsyndromeandincreasedriskofbarrettsesophagusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salamatimajid relationshipbetweenmetabolicsyndromeandincreasedriskofbarrettsesophagusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT azamimilad relationshipbetweenmetabolicsyndromeandincreasedriskofbarrettsesophagusanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |