Cargando…

Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is uniquely positioned to address challenges posed to emergency departments (EDs) by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. By reducing in-person contact, it should decrease provider risk of infection and preserve personal protective equipment (PPE). OBJECTIVES: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlberg, David J., Bhat, Rahul, Patterson, William O., Zaatari, Saad, Chandra, Vinodh, Kolkin, Alexander, Ratwani, Raj M., Wilson, Matthew D., Ladkany, Diana, Adams, Katharine T., Jackson, Mary, Lysen-Hendershot, Kristi, Booker, Ethan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.08.007
_version_ 1783568743823048704
author Carlberg, David J.
Bhat, Rahul
Patterson, William O.
Zaatari, Saad
Chandra, Vinodh
Kolkin, Alexander
Ratwani, Raj M.
Wilson, Matthew D.
Ladkany, Diana
Adams, Katharine T.
Jackson, Mary
Lysen-Hendershot, Kristi
Booker, Ethan A.
author_facet Carlberg, David J.
Bhat, Rahul
Patterson, William O.
Zaatari, Saad
Chandra, Vinodh
Kolkin, Alexander
Ratwani, Raj M.
Wilson, Matthew D.
Ladkany, Diana
Adams, Katharine T.
Jackson, Mary
Lysen-Hendershot, Kristi
Booker, Ethan A.
author_sort Carlberg, David J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is uniquely positioned to address challenges posed to emergency departments (EDs) by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. By reducing in-person contact, it should decrease provider risk of infection and preserve personal protective equipment (PPE). OBJECTIVES: To describe and assess the early results of a novel telehealth workflow in which remote providers collaborate with in-person nursing to evaluate and discharge well-appearing, low-risk ED patients with suspected COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was completed 3 weeks after implementation. Metrics include the number of patients evaluated, number of patients discharged without in-person contact, telehealth wait time and duration, collection of testing, ED length of stay (ED-LOS), 72-h return, number of in-person health care provider contacts, and associated PPE use. RESULTS: Among 302 patients evaluated by telehealth, 153 patients were evaluated and discharged by a telehealth provider with reductions in ED-LOS, PPE use, and close contact with health care personnel. These patients had a 62.5% shorter ED-LOS compared with other Emergency Severity Index level 4 patients seen over the same time period. Telehealth use for these 153 patients saved 413 sets of PPE. We observed a 3.9% 72-h revisit rate. One patient discharged after telehealth evaluation was hospitalized on a return visit 9 days later. CONCLUSION: Telehealth can be safely and efficiently used to evaluate, treat, test, and discharge ED patients suspected to have COVID-19. This workflow reduces infection risks to health care providers, PPE use, and ED-LOS. Additionally, it allows quarantined but otherwise well clinicians to continue working.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7413125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74131252020-08-10 Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19 Carlberg, David J. Bhat, Rahul Patterson, William O. Zaatari, Saad Chandra, Vinodh Kolkin, Alexander Ratwani, Raj M. Wilson, Matthew D. Ladkany, Diana Adams, Katharine T. Jackson, Mary Lysen-Hendershot, Kristi Booker, Ethan A. J Emerg Med Public Health in Emergency Medicine BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is uniquely positioned to address challenges posed to emergency departments (EDs) by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. By reducing in-person contact, it should decrease provider risk of infection and preserve personal protective equipment (PPE). OBJECTIVES: To describe and assess the early results of a novel telehealth workflow in which remote providers collaborate with in-person nursing to evaluate and discharge well-appearing, low-risk ED patients with suspected COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was completed 3 weeks after implementation. Metrics include the number of patients evaluated, number of patients discharged without in-person contact, telehealth wait time and duration, collection of testing, ED length of stay (ED-LOS), 72-h return, number of in-person health care provider contacts, and associated PPE use. RESULTS: Among 302 patients evaluated by telehealth, 153 patients were evaluated and discharged by a telehealth provider with reductions in ED-LOS, PPE use, and close contact with health care personnel. These patients had a 62.5% shorter ED-LOS compared with other Emergency Severity Index level 4 patients seen over the same time period. Telehealth use for these 153 patients saved 413 sets of PPE. We observed a 3.9% 72-h revisit rate. One patient discharged after telehealth evaluation was hospitalized on a return visit 9 days later. CONCLUSION: Telehealth can be safely and efficiently used to evaluate, treat, test, and discharge ED patients suspected to have COVID-19. This workflow reduces infection risks to health care providers, PPE use, and ED-LOS. Additionally, it allows quarantined but otherwise well clinicians to continue working. Elsevier Inc. 2020-12 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7413125/ /pubmed/33008664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.08.007 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Public Health in Emergency Medicine
Carlberg, David J.
Bhat, Rahul
Patterson, William O.
Zaatari, Saad
Chandra, Vinodh
Kolkin, Alexander
Ratwani, Raj M.
Wilson, Matthew D.
Ladkany, Diana
Adams, Katharine T.
Jackson, Mary
Lysen-Hendershot, Kristi
Booker, Ethan A.
Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19
title Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19
title_full Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19
title_fullStr Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19
title_short Preliminary Assessment of a Telehealth Approach to Evaluating, Treating, and Discharging Low-Acuity Patients With Suspected COVID-19
title_sort preliminary assessment of a telehealth approach to evaluating, treating, and discharging low-acuity patients with suspected covid-19
topic Public Health in Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33008664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT carlbergdavidj preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT bhatrahul preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT pattersonwilliamo preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT zaatarisaad preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT chandravinodh preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT kolkinalexander preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT ratwanirajm preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT wilsonmatthewd preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT ladkanydiana preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT adamskatharinet preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT jacksonmary preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT lysenhendershotkristi preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19
AT bookerethana preliminaryassessmentofatelehealthapproachtoevaluatingtreatinganddischarginglowacuitypatientswithsuspectedcovid19