Cargando…

A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG ICBPB) is a popular technique for forearm surgeries distal to the elbow. Our study details the ultrasound (US) characteristics of this block and the structures encountered by the needle in four approaches to the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivapurapu, Vijayalakshmi, Bhat, Ravindra R, Vani, N Isai, Raajesh, Joseph I, Aruna, S, Paulose, Deepak T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792740
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_920_19
_version_ 1783568776708489216
author Sivapurapu, Vijayalakshmi
Bhat, Ravindra R
Vani, N Isai
Raajesh, Joseph I
Aruna, S
Paulose, Deepak T
author_facet Sivapurapu, Vijayalakshmi
Bhat, Ravindra R
Vani, N Isai
Raajesh, Joseph I
Aruna, S
Paulose, Deepak T
author_sort Sivapurapu, Vijayalakshmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG ICBPB) is a popular technique for forearm surgeries distal to the elbow. Our study details the ultrasound (US) characteristics of this block and the structures encountered by the needle in four approaches to the infraclavicular area – lateral infraclavicular (LICF), costoclavicular medial to lateral (CML) and lateral to medial (CLM) and retroclavicular (R) by anatomical dissection. METHODS: USG ICBPB was performed in 10 cadavers—5 on the right side and 5 on the left side by each of four approaches and with an 18 gauge Tuohy needle kept in situ, and US characteristics were noted. Anatomical dissection was done and important structures were described in detail. RESULTS: Needle tip and shaft visibility were least with LICF approach and best in R approach. Needle angle correlated with chest and neck circumference in LICF and CML groups. During dissection, in all approaches, neurovascular structures have been observed in the near vicinity of the needle, especially the thoracoacromial artery (TAA) or its branches. In the R approach, the 'blind spot' behind the clavicle is an area where neurovascular structures were present. CONCLUSION: The R approach gives better visibility of needle shaft beyond the clavicle, but the clavicle acts as a 'blind-spot' for the US beam obliterating important neurovascular structures. The various neurovascular structures the needle traverses or in its immediate vicinity, do not necessarily make the CML, CLM or R approach any better than the LICF approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7413351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74133512020-08-12 A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block Sivapurapu, Vijayalakshmi Bhat, Ravindra R Vani, N Isai Raajesh, Joseph I Aruna, S Paulose, Deepak T Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (USG ICBPB) is a popular technique for forearm surgeries distal to the elbow. Our study details the ultrasound (US) characteristics of this block and the structures encountered by the needle in four approaches to the infraclavicular area – lateral infraclavicular (LICF), costoclavicular medial to lateral (CML) and lateral to medial (CLM) and retroclavicular (R) by anatomical dissection. METHODS: USG ICBPB was performed in 10 cadavers—5 on the right side and 5 on the left side by each of four approaches and with an 18 gauge Tuohy needle kept in situ, and US characteristics were noted. Anatomical dissection was done and important structures were described in detail. RESULTS: Needle tip and shaft visibility were least with LICF approach and best in R approach. Needle angle correlated with chest and neck circumference in LICF and CML groups. During dissection, in all approaches, neurovascular structures have been observed in the near vicinity of the needle, especially the thoracoacromial artery (TAA) or its branches. In the R approach, the 'blind spot' behind the clavicle is an area where neurovascular structures were present. CONCLUSION: The R approach gives better visibility of needle shaft beyond the clavicle, but the clavicle acts as a 'blind-spot' for the US beam obliterating important neurovascular structures. The various neurovascular structures the needle traverses or in its immediate vicinity, do not necessarily make the CML, CLM or R approach any better than the LICF approach. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-07 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7413351/ /pubmed/32792740 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_920_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sivapurapu, Vijayalakshmi
Bhat, Ravindra R
Vani, N Isai
Raajesh, Joseph I
Aruna, S
Paulose, Deepak T
A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
title A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
title_full A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
title_fullStr A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
title_full_unstemmed A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
title_short A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
title_sort cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792740
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_920_19
work_keys_str_mv AT sivapurapuvijayalakshmi acadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT bhatravindrar acadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT vaninisai acadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT raajeshjosephi acadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT arunas acadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT paulosedeepakt acadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT sivapurapuvijayalakshmi cadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT bhatravindrar cadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT vaninisai cadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT raajeshjosephi cadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT arunas cadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock
AT paulosedeepakt cadaverstudyoffourapproachesofultrasoundguidedinfraclavicularbrachialplexusblock