Cargando…
Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1 |
_version_ | 1783568781724876800 |
---|---|
author | Weber, Markus Merle, Christian Nawabi, Danyal H. Dendorfer, Sebastian Grifka, Joachim Renkawitz, Tobias |
author_facet | Weber, Markus Merle, Christian Nawabi, Danyal H. Dendorfer, Sebastian Grifka, Joachim Renkawitz, Tobias |
author_sort | Weber, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p < 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p < 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p < 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10% (p > 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7413373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74133732020-08-10 Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion Weber, Markus Merle, Christian Nawabi, Danyal H. Dendorfer, Sebastian Grifka, Joachim Renkawitz, Tobias Sci Rep Article Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p < 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p < 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p < 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10% (p > 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7413373/ /pubmed/32764592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Weber, Markus Merle, Christian Nawabi, Danyal H. Dendorfer, Sebastian Grifka, Joachim Renkawitz, Tobias Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
title | Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
title_full | Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
title_fullStr | Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
title_short | Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
title_sort | inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT webermarkus inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion AT merlechristian inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion AT nawabidanyalh inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion AT dendorfersebastian inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion AT grifkajoachim inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion AT renkawitztobias inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion |