Cargando…

Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion

Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Markus, Merle, Christian, Nawabi, Danyal H., Dendorfer, Sebastian, Grifka, Joachim, Renkawitz, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1
_version_ 1783568781724876800
author Weber, Markus
Merle, Christian
Nawabi, Danyal H.
Dendorfer, Sebastian
Grifka, Joachim
Renkawitz, Tobias
author_facet Weber, Markus
Merle, Christian
Nawabi, Danyal H.
Dendorfer, Sebastian
Grifka, Joachim
Renkawitz, Tobias
author_sort Weber, Markus
collection PubMed
description Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p < 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p < 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p < 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10% (p > 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7413373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74133732020-08-10 Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion Weber, Markus Merle, Christian Nawabi, Danyal H. Dendorfer, Sebastian Grifka, Joachim Renkawitz, Tobias Sci Rep Article Offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with postoperative range of motion (ROM) and gait kinematics. We aimed to research into the impact of high offset (HO) and standard stems on postoperative ROM. 121 patients received cementless THA through a minimally-invasive anterolateral approach. A 360° hip ROM analysis software calculated impingement-free hip movement based on postoperative 3D-CTs compared to ROM values necessary for activities of daily living (ADL). The same model was then run a second time after changing the stem geometry between standard and HO configuration with the implants in the same position. HO stems showed higher ROM for all directions between 4.6 and 8.9° (p < 0.001) compared with standard stems but with high interindividual variability. In the subgroup with HO stems for intraoperative offset restoration, the increase in ROM was even higher for all ROM directions with values between 6.1 and 14.4° (p < 0.001) compared to offset underrestoration with standard stems. Avoiding offset underrestoration resulted in a higher amount of patients of over 20% for each ROM direction that fulfilled the criteria for ADL (p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with standard stems for offset restoration ROM did increase but not clinically relevant by offset overcorrection for all directions between 3.1 and 6.1° (p < 0.001). Offset overcorrection by replacing standard with HO stems improved ROM for ADL in a low number of patients below 10% (p > 0.03). Patient-individual restoration of offset is crucial for free ROM in THA. Both over and underrestoration of offset should be avoided. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7413373/ /pubmed/32764592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Weber, Markus
Merle, Christian
Nawabi, Danyal H.
Dendorfer, Sebastian
Grifka, Joachim
Renkawitz, Tobias
Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
title Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
title_full Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
title_fullStr Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
title_full_unstemmed Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
title_short Inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
title_sort inaccurate offset restoration in total hip arthroplasty results in reduced range of motion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32764592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70059-1
work_keys_str_mv AT webermarkus inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion
AT merlechristian inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion
AT nawabidanyalh inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion
AT dendorfersebastian inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion
AT grifkajoachim inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion
AT renkawitztobias inaccurateoffsetrestorationintotalhiparthroplastyresultsinreducedrangeofmotion