Cargando…

A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts

BACKGROUND: Warts are common cutaneous viral infection with a wide range of therapeutic modalities. Various agents have been tried for immunotherapy in warts. OBJECTIVES: Determine the role of intralesional and intradermal measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in the treatment of common warts; to co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Pragya, Tegta, Geeta Ram, Verma, G. K., Gupta, Abhishek, Gupta, Mudita, Sharma, Shikha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832442
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_144_19
_version_ 1783568795490582528
author Gupta, Pragya
Tegta, Geeta Ram
Verma, G. K.
Gupta, Abhishek
Gupta, Mudita
Sharma, Shikha
author_facet Gupta, Pragya
Tegta, Geeta Ram
Verma, G. K.
Gupta, Abhishek
Gupta, Mudita
Sharma, Shikha
author_sort Gupta, Pragya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Warts are common cutaneous viral infection with a wide range of therapeutic modalities. Various agents have been tried for immunotherapy in warts. OBJECTIVES: Determine the role of intralesional and intradermal measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in the treatment of common warts; to compare the efficacy of intralesional versus intradermal MMR vaccine. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients diagnosed with verruca vulgaris were divided into two groups. In study group A, the individuals were injected with an intralesional MMR vaccine of 0.3 mL in the representative wart (largest) once in 3 weeks till there is complete clearance or maximum of four injections whichever is earlier, while in study group B, the individuals were injected with an intradermal MMR vaccine of 0.3 mL over the unilateral deltoid muscle area at similar intervals. RESULTS: There were 33 patients in each group. In group A, 10 (30.3%) patients showed complete, 9 (27.3%) marked, 6 (18.2%) moderate, 3 (9.1%) mild, and 5 (15.2%) no response. In group B, seven (21.2%) patients showed complete, one (3.0%) marked, one (3.0%) moderate, four (12.1%) mild, and 20 (60.6%) no response. There were minimal side effects in the form of pain, erythema, itching at the injection site in a few patients, only one patient had syncope. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the MMR vaccine is an effective and safe modality of treatment for verruca vulgaris without any serious adverse effects. Also, the intralesional route showed better results in comparison to the intradermal route when we consider the treatment of a representative wart.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7413434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74134342020-08-20 A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts Gupta, Pragya Tegta, Geeta Ram Verma, G. K. Gupta, Abhishek Gupta, Mudita Sharma, Shikha Indian Dermatol Online J Original Article BACKGROUND: Warts are common cutaneous viral infection with a wide range of therapeutic modalities. Various agents have been tried for immunotherapy in warts. OBJECTIVES: Determine the role of intralesional and intradermal measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine in the treatment of common warts; to compare the efficacy of intralesional versus intradermal MMR vaccine. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients diagnosed with verruca vulgaris were divided into two groups. In study group A, the individuals were injected with an intralesional MMR vaccine of 0.3 mL in the representative wart (largest) once in 3 weeks till there is complete clearance or maximum of four injections whichever is earlier, while in study group B, the individuals were injected with an intradermal MMR vaccine of 0.3 mL over the unilateral deltoid muscle area at similar intervals. RESULTS: There were 33 patients in each group. In group A, 10 (30.3%) patients showed complete, 9 (27.3%) marked, 6 (18.2%) moderate, 3 (9.1%) mild, and 5 (15.2%) no response. In group B, seven (21.2%) patients showed complete, one (3.0%) marked, one (3.0%) moderate, four (12.1%) mild, and 20 (60.6%) no response. There were minimal side effects in the form of pain, erythema, itching at the injection site in a few patients, only one patient had syncope. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the MMR vaccine is an effective and safe modality of treatment for verruca vulgaris without any serious adverse effects. Also, the intralesional route showed better results in comparison to the intradermal route when we consider the treatment of a representative wart. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7413434/ /pubmed/32832442 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_144_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Dermatology Online Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Pragya
Tegta, Geeta Ram
Verma, G. K.
Gupta, Abhishek
Gupta, Mudita
Sharma, Shikha
A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts
title A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts
title_full A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts
title_fullStr A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts
title_full_unstemmed A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts
title_short A Study to Evaluate the Role of Intradermal and Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine in Treatment of Common Warts
title_sort study to evaluate the role of intradermal and intralesional measles, mumps, rubella (mmr) vaccine in treatment of common warts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832442
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_144_19
work_keys_str_mv AT guptapragya astudytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT tegtageetaram astudytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT vermagk astudytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT guptaabhishek astudytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT guptamudita astudytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT sharmashikha astudytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT guptapragya studytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT tegtageetaram studytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT vermagk studytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT guptaabhishek studytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT guptamudita studytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts
AT sharmashikha studytoevaluatetheroleofintradermalandintralesionalmeaslesmumpsrubellammrvaccineintreatmentofcommonwarts