Cargando…
Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897 |
_version_ | 1783568858791018496 |
---|---|
author | Bhadkamkar, Mohin A. Luu, Bryan C. Davis, Matthew J. Reece, Edward M. Chu, Carrie K. Buchanan, Edward P. Winocour, Sebastian |
author_facet | Bhadkamkar, Mohin A. Luu, Bryan C. Davis, Matthew J. Reece, Edward M. Chu, Carrie K. Buchanan, Edward P. Winocour, Sebastian |
author_sort | Bhadkamkar, Mohin A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of one training model over the other. In this article, we review the existing literature to compare these pathways with regard to quality of trainees, proficiency of graduates, and practice or career outcomes. Ongoing studies are strongly encouraged to continue to identify areas of improvement for both types of training programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7413769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74137692020-08-14 Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature Bhadkamkar, Mohin A. Luu, Bryan C. Davis, Matthew J. Reece, Edward M. Chu, Carrie K. Buchanan, Edward P. Winocour, Sebastian Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Plastic Surgery Focus There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of one training model over the other. In this article, we review the existing literature to compare these pathways with regard to quality of trainees, proficiency of graduates, and practice or career outcomes. Ongoing studies are strongly encouraged to continue to identify areas of improvement for both types of training programs. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7413769/ /pubmed/32802640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Plastic Surgery Focus Bhadkamkar, Mohin A. Luu, Bryan C. Davis, Matthew J. Reece, Edward M. Chu, Carrie K. Buchanan, Edward P. Winocour, Sebastian Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature |
title | Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature |
title_full | Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature |
title_short | Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature |
title_sort | comparing independent and integrated plastic surgery residency models: a review of the literature |
topic | Plastic Surgery Focus |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhadkamkarmohina comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature AT luubryanc comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature AT davismatthewj comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature AT reeceedwardm comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature AT chucarriek comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature AT buchananedwardp comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature AT winocoursebastian comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature |