Cargando…

Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature

There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhadkamkar, Mohin A., Luu, Bryan C., Davis, Matthew J., Reece, Edward M., Chu, Carrie K., Buchanan, Edward P., Winocour, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897
_version_ 1783568858791018496
author Bhadkamkar, Mohin A.
Luu, Bryan C.
Davis, Matthew J.
Reece, Edward M.
Chu, Carrie K.
Buchanan, Edward P.
Winocour, Sebastian
author_facet Bhadkamkar, Mohin A.
Luu, Bryan C.
Davis, Matthew J.
Reece, Edward M.
Chu, Carrie K.
Buchanan, Edward P.
Winocour, Sebastian
author_sort Bhadkamkar, Mohin A.
collection PubMed
description There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of one training model over the other. In this article, we review the existing literature to compare these pathways with regard to quality of trainees, proficiency of graduates, and practice or career outcomes. Ongoing studies are strongly encouraged to continue to identify areas of improvement for both types of training programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7413769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74137692020-08-14 Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature Bhadkamkar, Mohin A. Luu, Bryan C. Davis, Matthew J. Reece, Edward M. Chu, Carrie K. Buchanan, Edward P. Winocour, Sebastian Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Plastic Surgery Focus There are currently 2 approved residency training models in the United States conferring eligibility for the American Board of Plastic Surgery examination—the integrated pathway and the independent pathway. While both pathways allow for board certification, there has been much debate regarding the effectiveness of one training model over the other. In this article, we review the existing literature to compare these pathways with regard to quality of trainees, proficiency of graduates, and practice or career outcomes. Ongoing studies are strongly encouraged to continue to identify areas of improvement for both types of training programs. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7413769/ /pubmed/32802640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Plastic Surgery Focus
Bhadkamkar, Mohin A.
Luu, Bryan C.
Davis, Matthew J.
Reece, Edward M.
Chu, Carrie K.
Buchanan, Edward P.
Winocour, Sebastian
Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
title Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
title_full Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
title_short Comparing Independent and Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Models: A Review of the Literature
title_sort comparing independent and integrated plastic surgery residency models: a review of the literature
topic Plastic Surgery Focus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002897
work_keys_str_mv AT bhadkamkarmohina comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature
AT luubryanc comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature
AT davismatthewj comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature
AT reeceedwardm comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature
AT chucarriek comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature
AT buchananedwardp comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature
AT winocoursebastian comparingindependentandintegratedplasticsurgeryresidencymodelsareviewoftheliterature