Cargando…
The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants
Breast reconstruction modalities are based on autologous tissue transfer, implants, or a combination of both. The aim of an allogeneic breast reconstruction is to minimize the impact of the implant on surrounding tissues to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result. Accurate tissue coverage, proper i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002966 |
_version_ | 1783568859818622976 |
---|---|
author | Stillaert, Filip B. J. L. Lannau, Bernd Van Landuyt, Koenraad Blondeel, Phillip N. |
author_facet | Stillaert, Filip B. J. L. Lannau, Bernd Van Landuyt, Koenraad Blondeel, Phillip N. |
author_sort | Stillaert, Filip B. J. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast reconstruction modalities are based on autologous tissue transfer, implants, or a combination of both. The aim of an allogeneic breast reconstruction is to minimize the impact of the implant on surrounding tissues to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result. Accurate tissue coverage, proper implant selection, and implant location are the absolute concerns in planning an implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: A single surgeon’s experience with the ergonomic, hybrid approach in primary and secondary breast reconstructions is presented. The hybrid approach is based on tissue expansion followed by serial sessions of fat grafting to augment the residual autologous (subcutaneous) compartment. The last step included the insertion of a prepectoral, ergonomic implant to obtain central core projection and additional volume. RESULTS: Fifty-six hybrid breast reconstructions were performed with a mean follow-up of 24.1 months. Aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction have been good with pleasing breast projection, natural breast motion, and optimal coverage of the prepectoral implants. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid reconstructive approach is a reliable technique to improve the outcomes in implant-based breast reconstructions. The 2-step, prepectoral approach with expander-to-implant exchange allows better control of the final breast shape, and complications related to submuscular approaches are avoided. Fat grafting adds an autologous benefit to obtain natural results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7413773 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74137732020-08-14 The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants Stillaert, Filip B. J. L. Lannau, Bernd Van Landuyt, Koenraad Blondeel, Phillip N. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Breast reconstruction modalities are based on autologous tissue transfer, implants, or a combination of both. The aim of an allogeneic breast reconstruction is to minimize the impact of the implant on surrounding tissues to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result. Accurate tissue coverage, proper implant selection, and implant location are the absolute concerns in planning an implant-based reconstruction. METHODS: A single surgeon’s experience with the ergonomic, hybrid approach in primary and secondary breast reconstructions is presented. The hybrid approach is based on tissue expansion followed by serial sessions of fat grafting to augment the residual autologous (subcutaneous) compartment. The last step included the insertion of a prepectoral, ergonomic implant to obtain central core projection and additional volume. RESULTS: Fifty-six hybrid breast reconstructions were performed with a mean follow-up of 24.1 months. Aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction have been good with pleasing breast projection, natural breast motion, and optimal coverage of the prepectoral implants. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid reconstructive approach is a reliable technique to improve the outcomes in implant-based breast reconstructions. The 2-step, prepectoral approach with expander-to-implant exchange allows better control of the final breast shape, and complications related to submuscular approaches are avoided. Fat grafting adds an autologous benefit to obtain natural results. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7413773/ /pubmed/32802660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002966 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast Stillaert, Filip B. J. L. Lannau, Bernd Van Landuyt, Koenraad Blondeel, Phillip N. The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants |
title | The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants |
title_full | The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants |
title_fullStr | The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants |
title_short | The Prepectoral, Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: The Synergy of Lipofilling and Breast Implants |
title_sort | prepectoral, hybrid breast reconstruction: the synergy of lipofilling and breast implants |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413773/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stillaertfilipbjl theprepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT lannaubernd theprepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT vanlanduytkoenraad theprepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT blondeelphillipn theprepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT stillaertfilipbjl prepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT lannaubernd prepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT vanlanduytkoenraad prepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants AT blondeelphillipn prepectoralhybridbreastreconstructionthesynergyoflipofillingandbreastimplants |