Cargando…

Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient

Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy for breast cancer has become the standard of care. Microvascular breast augmentation is an alternative for patients with failed breast prostheses, including painful capsular contractures or poor cosmetic outcomes. We present a series...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deramo, Paul, Martinez, Carlos A., Boutros, Sean G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002978
_version_ 1783568868821696512
author Deramo, Paul
Martinez, Carlos A.
Boutros, Sean G.
author_facet Deramo, Paul
Martinez, Carlos A.
Boutros, Sean G.
author_sort Deramo, Paul
collection PubMed
description Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy for breast cancer has become the standard of care. Microvascular breast augmentation is an alternative for patients with failed breast prostheses, including painful capsular contractures or poor cosmetic outcomes. We present a series of 4 patients who underwent microvascular breast augmentation with cross-chest flap recipient vessels. METHODS: We perform a bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction in an outpatient setting following a modified recovery protocol, focused on decreasing postoperative pain and narcotic requirements, allowing early ambulation and discharge. This includes harvest of the flap via abdominal microfascial incisions and rib-sparing vessel dissection. Cosmetic microvascular augmentation of the contralateral breast was performed via cross-chest flap recipient vessel anastomoses, where the pedicle was tunneled across the chest and anastomosed to the primary flap. RESULTS: Four patients underwent flap-based breast augmentation with cross-chest recipient vessels. Two patients underwent immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction of the affected side and contralateral flap-based augmentation, while 2 patients underwent bilateral breast augmentation with DIEP flaps for cosmetic purposes due to undesired cosmetic results following implant-based augmentations. No intraoperative complications were reported, and all patients were discharged within 23 hours without signs of flap compromise or need for operative take-backs. Mean follow-up was 23 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The DIEP flap is recognized as an option for breast augmentation, although its limitations are several, including the pain and recovery associated with autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery protocols help reduce this burden, making it more acceptable and feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7413810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74138102020-08-14 Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient Deramo, Paul Martinez, Carlos A. Boutros, Sean G. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy for breast cancer has become the standard of care. Microvascular breast augmentation is an alternative for patients with failed breast prostheses, including painful capsular contractures or poor cosmetic outcomes. We present a series of 4 patients who underwent microvascular breast augmentation with cross-chest flap recipient vessels. METHODS: We perform a bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction in an outpatient setting following a modified recovery protocol, focused on decreasing postoperative pain and narcotic requirements, allowing early ambulation and discharge. This includes harvest of the flap via abdominal microfascial incisions and rib-sparing vessel dissection. Cosmetic microvascular augmentation of the contralateral breast was performed via cross-chest flap recipient vessel anastomoses, where the pedicle was tunneled across the chest and anastomosed to the primary flap. RESULTS: Four patients underwent flap-based breast augmentation with cross-chest recipient vessels. Two patients underwent immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction of the affected side and contralateral flap-based augmentation, while 2 patients underwent bilateral breast augmentation with DIEP flaps for cosmetic purposes due to undesired cosmetic results following implant-based augmentations. No intraoperative complications were reported, and all patients were discharged within 23 hours without signs of flap compromise or need for operative take-backs. Mean follow-up was 23 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The DIEP flap is recognized as an option for breast augmentation, although its limitations are several, including the pain and recovery associated with autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction. Enhanced recovery protocols help reduce this burden, making it more acceptable and feasible. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7413810/ /pubmed/32802670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002978 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Deramo, Paul
Martinez, Carlos A.
Boutros, Sean G.
Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient
title Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient
title_full Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient
title_fullStr Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient
title_full_unstemmed Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient
title_short Use of Single-recipient Vessels for Cross-chest Abdominal Flap–based Breast Augmentation as an Outpatient
title_sort use of single-recipient vessels for cross-chest abdominal flap–based breast augmentation as an outpatient
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002978
work_keys_str_mv AT deramopaul useofsinglerecipientvesselsforcrosschestabdominalflapbasedbreastaugmentationasanoutpatient
AT martinezcarlosa useofsinglerecipientvesselsforcrosschestabdominalflapbasedbreastaugmentationasanoutpatient
AT boutrosseang useofsinglerecipientvesselsforcrosschestabdominalflapbasedbreastaugmentationasanoutpatient