Cargando…
Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting
PURPOSE: Intermittent energy restriction (IER) is a popular weight loss (WL) strategy; however, its efficacy in clinical practice remains unknown. The present study compared the effects of IER compared to continuous energy restriction (CER) on WL and cardiometabolic risk factors in primary care. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02098-y |
_version_ | 1783568889547849728 |
---|---|
author | Antoni, R. Johnston, K. L. Steele, C. Carter, D. Robertson, M. D. Capehorn, M. S. |
author_facet | Antoni, R. Johnston, K. L. Steele, C. Carter, D. Robertson, M. D. Capehorn, M. S. |
author_sort | Antoni, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Intermittent energy restriction (IER) is a popular weight loss (WL) strategy; however, its efficacy in clinical practice remains unknown. The present study compared the effects of IER compared to continuous energy restriction (CER) on WL and cardiometabolic risk factors in primary care. METHODS: A (self-selected) cohort study was conducted at the Rotherham Institute for Obesity (RIO), a primary care-based weight management service. 197(24% male) obese patients volunteered to participate and selected their diet group. IER participants (n = 99) consumed ~ 2600 kJ for two days/week. CER participants (n = 98) restricted their diet by ~ 2100 kJ/day below estimated requirements. Both interventions were delivered alongside RIO standard care. Changes in anthropometry and cardiometabolic disease risk markers (fasting biochemistry and blood pressure) were assessed after a 6-month intervention period and then participants were followed up again 6 months later (month 12). RESULTS: 27 IER patients (27%) and 39 CER patients (40%) completed the 6-month weight loss phase. Among completers, mean (SEM) WL was greater in the IER group at 6 months (5.4 ± 1.1% versus 2.8 ± 0.6%; p = 0.01), as were reductions in fat mass (p < 0.001) and improvements in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Fasting insulin (p = 0.873) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.701) were reduced similarly in both groups. However, in the IER group, changes in anthropometry and blood pressure in the IER group had reverted to baseline by 12-month follow-up, whilst the CER group maintained weight loss but showed an increase in blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Among completers, IER resulted in superior short-term changes in anthropometry and some cardiometabolic risk factors. However, rates of attrition and weight regain were higher compared with standard care, providing important insights in the implementations of IER within a “real-life” NHS setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN31465600. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-019-02098-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7413919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74139192020-08-17 Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting Antoni, R. Johnston, K. L. Steele, C. Carter, D. Robertson, M. D. Capehorn, M. S. Eur J Nutr Short Communication PURPOSE: Intermittent energy restriction (IER) is a popular weight loss (WL) strategy; however, its efficacy in clinical practice remains unknown. The present study compared the effects of IER compared to continuous energy restriction (CER) on WL and cardiometabolic risk factors in primary care. METHODS: A (self-selected) cohort study was conducted at the Rotherham Institute for Obesity (RIO), a primary care-based weight management service. 197(24% male) obese patients volunteered to participate and selected their diet group. IER participants (n = 99) consumed ~ 2600 kJ for two days/week. CER participants (n = 98) restricted their diet by ~ 2100 kJ/day below estimated requirements. Both interventions were delivered alongside RIO standard care. Changes in anthropometry and cardiometabolic disease risk markers (fasting biochemistry and blood pressure) were assessed after a 6-month intervention period and then participants were followed up again 6 months later (month 12). RESULTS: 27 IER patients (27%) and 39 CER patients (40%) completed the 6-month weight loss phase. Among completers, mean (SEM) WL was greater in the IER group at 6 months (5.4 ± 1.1% versus 2.8 ± 0.6%; p = 0.01), as were reductions in fat mass (p < 0.001) and improvements in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Fasting insulin (p = 0.873) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.701) were reduced similarly in both groups. However, in the IER group, changes in anthropometry and blood pressure in the IER group had reverted to baseline by 12-month follow-up, whilst the CER group maintained weight loss but showed an increase in blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Among completers, IER resulted in superior short-term changes in anthropometry and some cardiometabolic risk factors. However, rates of attrition and weight regain were higher compared with standard care, providing important insights in the implementations of IER within a “real-life” NHS setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN31465600. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00394-019-02098-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-10-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7413919/ /pubmed/31605198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02098-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Antoni, R. Johnston, K. L. Steele, C. Carter, D. Robertson, M. D. Capehorn, M. S. Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
title | Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
title_full | Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
title_short | Efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
title_sort | efficacy of an intermittent energy restriction diet in a primary care setting |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31605198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-019-02098-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonir efficacyofanintermittentenergyrestrictiondietinaprimarycaresetting AT johnstonkl efficacyofanintermittentenergyrestrictiondietinaprimarycaresetting AT steelec efficacyofanintermittentenergyrestrictiondietinaprimarycaresetting AT carterd efficacyofanintermittentenergyrestrictiondietinaprimarycaresetting AT robertsonmd efficacyofanintermittentenergyrestrictiondietinaprimarycaresetting AT capehornms efficacyofanintermittentenergyrestrictiondietinaprimarycaresetting |