Cargando…
Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Immediate implants are frequently employed in the anterior maxillary area. However, the installation of dental implants simultaneously with tooth extraction can also provide with benefits in the posterior areas with a reduction in time prior the recovery of the masticatory function. Resu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5 |
_version_ | 1783568892071772160 |
---|---|
author | Ragucci, Gian Maria Elnayef, Basel Criado-Cámara, Elena Del Amo, Fernando Suárez-López Hernández-Alfaro, Federico |
author_facet | Ragucci, Gian Maria Elnayef, Basel Criado-Cámara, Elena Del Amo, Fernando Suárez-López Hernández-Alfaro, Federico |
author_sort | Ragucci, Gian Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immediate implants are frequently employed in the anterior maxillary area. However, the installation of dental implants simultaneously with tooth extraction can also provide with benefits in the posterior areas with a reduction in time prior the recovery of the masticatory function. Results previously reported in the literature show high-survival and success rates for implants placed in extraction sockets in molar areas; however, this topic has received limited systematic analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several data-bases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to January 2019 reporting outcomes of immediate implants placed in molar areas. Primary outcomes included survival and success rates, as well as marginal bone loss. Secondary outcomes included the influence of implant position, type of implant connection, grafting protocol, flap or flapless approach, implant diameter, surgical phase, presence of buccal plate, and loading protocol. RESULTS: Twenty studies provided information on the survival rate, with a total sample of 1.106 implants. The weighted mean survival rate of immediate implants after 1 year of follow-up was 96.6%, and the success rate was 93.3%. On the other hand, marginal bone loss was 1.29 ± 0.24 mm. Secondary outcomes demonstrated that grafting the gap and the loading protocol have an effect on survival and success rates. Similarly, the presence or absence of the buccal bone affect crestal bone levels. Meta-analysis of 4 investigations showed a weighted mean difference of 0.31 mm ± 0.8 IC 95% (0.15–0.46) more marginal bone loss at immediate implant placement versus implants in healed sites (p < 0.001) I(2) = 15.2%. CONCLUSION: In selected scenarios, immediate implant placement in molar extraction socket might be considered a predictable technique as demonstrated by a high survival and success rates, with minimal marginal bone loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7413966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74139662020-08-14 Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ragucci, Gian Maria Elnayef, Basel Criado-Cámara, Elena Del Amo, Fernando Suárez-López Hernández-Alfaro, Federico Int J Implant Dent Review BACKGROUND: Immediate implants are frequently employed in the anterior maxillary area. However, the installation of dental implants simultaneously with tooth extraction can also provide with benefits in the posterior areas with a reduction in time prior the recovery of the masticatory function. Results previously reported in the literature show high-survival and success rates for implants placed in extraction sockets in molar areas; however, this topic has received limited systematic analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several data-bases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to January 2019 reporting outcomes of immediate implants placed in molar areas. Primary outcomes included survival and success rates, as well as marginal bone loss. Secondary outcomes included the influence of implant position, type of implant connection, grafting protocol, flap or flapless approach, implant diameter, surgical phase, presence of buccal plate, and loading protocol. RESULTS: Twenty studies provided information on the survival rate, with a total sample of 1.106 implants. The weighted mean survival rate of immediate implants after 1 year of follow-up was 96.6%, and the success rate was 93.3%. On the other hand, marginal bone loss was 1.29 ± 0.24 mm. Secondary outcomes demonstrated that grafting the gap and the loading protocol have an effect on survival and success rates. Similarly, the presence or absence of the buccal bone affect crestal bone levels. Meta-analysis of 4 investigations showed a weighted mean difference of 0.31 mm ± 0.8 IC 95% (0.15–0.46) more marginal bone loss at immediate implant placement versus implants in healed sites (p < 0.001) I(2) = 15.2%. CONCLUSION: In selected scenarios, immediate implant placement in molar extraction socket might be considered a predictable technique as demonstrated by a high survival and success rates, with minimal marginal bone loss. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7413966/ /pubmed/32770283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Ragucci, Gian Maria Elnayef, Basel Criado-Cámara, Elena Del Amo, Fernando Suárez-López Hernández-Alfaro, Federico Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | immediate implant placement in molar extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7413966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00235-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raguccigianmaria immediateimplantplacementinmolarextractionsocketsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT elnayefbasel immediateimplantplacementinmolarextractionsocketsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT criadocamaraelena immediateimplantplacementinmolarextractionsocketsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT delamofernandosuarezlopez immediateimplantplacementinmolarextractionsocketsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hernandezalfarofederico immediateimplantplacementinmolarextractionsocketsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |