Cargando…
The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7 |
_version_ | 1783568911195701248 |
---|---|
author | Cheasley, Dane Devereux, Lisa Hughes, Siobhan Nickson, Carolyn Procopio, Pietro Lee, Grant Li, Na Pridmore, Vicki Elder, Kenneth Bruce Mann, G. Kader, Tanjina Rowley, Simone M. Fox, Stephen B. Byrne, David Saunders, Hugo Fujihara, Kenji M. Lim, Belle Gorringe, Kylie L. Campbell, Ian G. |
author_facet | Cheasley, Dane Devereux, Lisa Hughes, Siobhan Nickson, Carolyn Procopio, Pietro Lee, Grant Li, Na Pridmore, Vicki Elder, Kenneth Bruce Mann, G. Kader, Tanjina Rowley, Simone M. Fox, Stephen B. Byrne, David Saunders, Hugo Fujihara, Kenji M. Lim, Belle Gorringe, Kylie L. Campbell, Ian G. |
author_sort | Cheasley, Dane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development. Women diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer where MD measurement was also available (n = 842) were identified from the Lifepool cohort of >54,000 women participating in population-based mammographic screening. This group included 142 carcinomas in the lowest quintile of MD and 119 carcinomas in the highest quintile. Clinico-pathological and family history information were recorded. Tumor DNA was collected where available (n = 56) and sequenced for breast cancer predisposition and driver gene mutations, including copy number alterations. Compared to carcinomas from low-MD breasts, those from high-MD breasts were significantly associated with a younger age at diagnosis and features associated with poor prognosis. Low- and high-MD carcinomas matched for grade, histological subtype, and hormone receptor status were compared for somatic genetic features. Low-MD carcinomas had a significantly increased frequency of TP53 mutations, higher homologous recombination deficiency, higher fraction of the genome altered, and more copy number gains on chromosome 1q and losses on 17p. While high-MD carcinomas showed enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the stroma. The data demonstrate that when tumors were matched for confounding clinico-pathological features, a proportion in the lowest quintile of MD appear biologically distinct, reflective of microenvironment differences between the lowest and highest quintiles of MD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7414106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74141062020-08-14 The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density Cheasley, Dane Devereux, Lisa Hughes, Siobhan Nickson, Carolyn Procopio, Pietro Lee, Grant Li, Na Pridmore, Vicki Elder, Kenneth Bruce Mann, G. Kader, Tanjina Rowley, Simone M. Fox, Stephen B. Byrne, David Saunders, Hugo Fujihara, Kenji M. Lim, Belle Gorringe, Kylie L. Campbell, Ian G. NPJ Breast Cancer Article Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development. Women diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer where MD measurement was also available (n = 842) were identified from the Lifepool cohort of >54,000 women participating in population-based mammographic screening. This group included 142 carcinomas in the lowest quintile of MD and 119 carcinomas in the highest quintile. Clinico-pathological and family history information were recorded. Tumor DNA was collected where available (n = 56) and sequenced for breast cancer predisposition and driver gene mutations, including copy number alterations. Compared to carcinomas from low-MD breasts, those from high-MD breasts were significantly associated with a younger age at diagnosis and features associated with poor prognosis. Low- and high-MD carcinomas matched for grade, histological subtype, and hormone receptor status were compared for somatic genetic features. Low-MD carcinomas had a significantly increased frequency of TP53 mutations, higher homologous recombination deficiency, higher fraction of the genome altered, and more copy number gains on chromosome 1q and losses on 17p. While high-MD carcinomas showed enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the stroma. The data demonstrate that when tumors were matched for confounding clinico-pathological features, a proportion in the lowest quintile of MD appear biologically distinct, reflective of microenvironment differences between the lowest and highest quintiles of MD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7414106/ /pubmed/32802943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Cheasley, Dane Devereux, Lisa Hughes, Siobhan Nickson, Carolyn Procopio, Pietro Lee, Grant Li, Na Pridmore, Vicki Elder, Kenneth Bruce Mann, G. Kader, Tanjina Rowley, Simone M. Fox, Stephen B. Byrne, David Saunders, Hugo Fujihara, Kenji M. Lim, Belle Gorringe, Kylie L. Campbell, Ian G. The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
title | The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
title_full | The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
title_fullStr | The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
title_full_unstemmed | The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
title_short | The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
title_sort | tp53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheasleydane thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT devereuxlisa thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT hughessiobhan thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT nicksoncarolyn thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT procopiopietro thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT leegrant thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT lina thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT pridmorevicki thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT elderkenneth thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT brucemanng thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT kadertanjina thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT rowleysimonem thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT foxstephenb thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT byrnedavid thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT saundershugo thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT fujiharakenjim thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT limbelle thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT gorringekyliel thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT campbelliang thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT cheasleydane tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT devereuxlisa tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT hughessiobhan tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT nicksoncarolyn tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT procopiopietro tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT leegrant tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT lina tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT pridmorevicki tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT elderkenneth tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT brucemanng tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT kadertanjina tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT rowleysimonem tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT foxstephenb tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT byrnedavid tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT saundershugo tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT fujiharakenjim tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT limbelle tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT gorringekyliel tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity AT campbelliang tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity |