Cargando…

The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density

Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheasley, Dane, Devereux, Lisa, Hughes, Siobhan, Nickson, Carolyn, Procopio, Pietro, Lee, Grant, Li, Na, Pridmore, Vicki, Elder, Kenneth, Bruce Mann, G., Kader, Tanjina, Rowley, Simone M., Fox, Stephen B., Byrne, David, Saunders, Hugo, Fujihara, Kenji M., Lim, Belle, Gorringe, Kylie L., Campbell, Ian G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7
_version_ 1783568911195701248
author Cheasley, Dane
Devereux, Lisa
Hughes, Siobhan
Nickson, Carolyn
Procopio, Pietro
Lee, Grant
Li, Na
Pridmore, Vicki
Elder, Kenneth
Bruce Mann, G.
Kader, Tanjina
Rowley, Simone M.
Fox, Stephen B.
Byrne, David
Saunders, Hugo
Fujihara, Kenji M.
Lim, Belle
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Campbell, Ian G.
author_facet Cheasley, Dane
Devereux, Lisa
Hughes, Siobhan
Nickson, Carolyn
Procopio, Pietro
Lee, Grant
Li, Na
Pridmore, Vicki
Elder, Kenneth
Bruce Mann, G.
Kader, Tanjina
Rowley, Simone M.
Fox, Stephen B.
Byrne, David
Saunders, Hugo
Fujihara, Kenji M.
Lim, Belle
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Campbell, Ian G.
author_sort Cheasley, Dane
collection PubMed
description Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development. Women diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer where MD measurement was also available (n = 842) were identified from the Lifepool cohort of >54,000 women participating in population-based mammographic screening. This group included 142 carcinomas in the lowest quintile of MD and 119 carcinomas in the highest quintile. Clinico-pathological and family history information were recorded. Tumor DNA was collected where available (n = 56) and sequenced for breast cancer predisposition and driver gene mutations, including copy number alterations. Compared to carcinomas from low-MD breasts, those from high-MD breasts were significantly associated with a younger age at diagnosis and features associated with poor prognosis. Low- and high-MD carcinomas matched for grade, histological subtype, and hormone receptor status were compared for somatic genetic features. Low-MD carcinomas had a significantly increased frequency of TP53 mutations, higher homologous recombination deficiency, higher fraction of the genome altered, and more copy number gains on chromosome 1q and losses on 17p. While high-MD carcinomas showed enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the stroma. The data demonstrate that when tumors were matched for confounding clinico-pathological features, a proportion in the lowest quintile of MD appear biologically distinct, reflective of microenvironment differences between the lowest and highest quintiles of MD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7414106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74141062020-08-14 The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density Cheasley, Dane Devereux, Lisa Hughes, Siobhan Nickson, Carolyn Procopio, Pietro Lee, Grant Li, Na Pridmore, Vicki Elder, Kenneth Bruce Mann, G. Kader, Tanjina Rowley, Simone M. Fox, Stephen B. Byrne, David Saunders, Hugo Fujihara, Kenji M. Lim, Belle Gorringe, Kylie L. Campbell, Ian G. NPJ Breast Cancer Article Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development. Women diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer where MD measurement was also available (n = 842) were identified from the Lifepool cohort of >54,000 women participating in population-based mammographic screening. This group included 142 carcinomas in the lowest quintile of MD and 119 carcinomas in the highest quintile. Clinico-pathological and family history information were recorded. Tumor DNA was collected where available (n = 56) and sequenced for breast cancer predisposition and driver gene mutations, including copy number alterations. Compared to carcinomas from low-MD breasts, those from high-MD breasts were significantly associated with a younger age at diagnosis and features associated with poor prognosis. Low- and high-MD carcinomas matched for grade, histological subtype, and hormone receptor status were compared for somatic genetic features. Low-MD carcinomas had a significantly increased frequency of TP53 mutations, higher homologous recombination deficiency, higher fraction of the genome altered, and more copy number gains on chromosome 1q and losses on 17p. While high-MD carcinomas showed enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the stroma. The data demonstrate that when tumors were matched for confounding clinico-pathological features, a proportion in the lowest quintile of MD appear biologically distinct, reflective of microenvironment differences between the lowest and highest quintiles of MD. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7414106/ /pubmed/32802943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Cheasley, Dane
Devereux, Lisa
Hughes, Siobhan
Nickson, Carolyn
Procopio, Pietro
Lee, Grant
Li, Na
Pridmore, Vicki
Elder, Kenneth
Bruce Mann, G.
Kader, Tanjina
Rowley, Simone M.
Fox, Stephen B.
Byrne, David
Saunders, Hugo
Fujihara, Kenji M.
Lim, Belle
Gorringe, Kylie L.
Campbell, Ian G.
The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
title The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
title_full The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
title_fullStr The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
title_full_unstemmed The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
title_short The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
title_sort tp53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7
work_keys_str_mv AT cheasleydane thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT devereuxlisa thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT hughessiobhan thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT nicksoncarolyn thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT procopiopietro thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT leegrant thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT lina thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT pridmorevicki thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT elderkenneth thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT brucemanng thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT kadertanjina thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT rowleysimonem thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT foxstephenb thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT byrnedavid thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT saundershugo thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT fujiharakenjim thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT limbelle thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT gorringekyliel thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT campbelliang thetp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT cheasleydane tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT devereuxlisa tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT hughessiobhan tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT nicksoncarolyn tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT procopiopietro tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT leegrant tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT lina tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT pridmorevicki tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT elderkenneth tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT brucemanng tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT kadertanjina tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT rowleysimonem tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT foxstephenb tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT byrnedavid tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT saundershugo tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT fujiharakenjim tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT limbelle tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT gorringekyliel tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity
AT campbelliang tp53mutationratediffersinbreastcancersthatariseinwomenwithhighorlowmammographicdensity