Cargando…

Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores

Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-pred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radford, Cameron, McNutt, John Weldon, Rogers, Tracey, Maslen, Ben, Jordan, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01156-0
_version_ 1783568921077481472
author Radford, Cameron
McNutt, John Weldon
Rogers, Tracey
Maslen, Ben
Jordan, Neil
author_facet Radford, Cameron
McNutt, John Weldon
Rogers, Tracey
Maslen, Ben
Jordan, Neil
author_sort Radford, Cameron
collection PubMed
description Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-predator eyespots do not occur naturally in contemporary mammals. Here we show that eyespots painted on cattle rumps were associated with reduced attacks by ambush carnivores (lions and leopards). Cattle painted with eyespots were significantly more likely to survive than were cross-marked and unmarked cattle, despite all treatment groups being similarly exposed to predation risk. While higher survival of eyespot-painted cattle supports the detection hypothesis, increased survival of cross-marked cattle suggests an effect of novel and conspicuous marks more generally. To our knowledge, this is the first time eyespots have been shown to deter large mammalian predators. Applying artificial marks to high-value livestock may therefore represent a cost-effective tool to reduce livestock predation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7414152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74141522020-08-14 Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores Radford, Cameron McNutt, John Weldon Rogers, Tracey Maslen, Ben Jordan, Neil Commun Biol Article Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-predator eyespots do not occur naturally in contemporary mammals. Here we show that eyespots painted on cattle rumps were associated with reduced attacks by ambush carnivores (lions and leopards). Cattle painted with eyespots were significantly more likely to survive than were cross-marked and unmarked cattle, despite all treatment groups being similarly exposed to predation risk. While higher survival of eyespot-painted cattle supports the detection hypothesis, increased survival of cross-marked cattle suggests an effect of novel and conspicuous marks more generally. To our knowledge, this is the first time eyespots have been shown to deter large mammalian predators. Applying artificial marks to high-value livestock may therefore represent a cost-effective tool to reduce livestock predation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7414152/ /pubmed/32770111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01156-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Radford, Cameron
McNutt, John Weldon
Rogers, Tracey
Maslen, Ben
Jordan, Neil
Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
title Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
title_full Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
title_fullStr Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
title_full_unstemmed Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
title_short Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
title_sort artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770111
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01156-0
work_keys_str_mv AT radfordcameron artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores
AT mcnuttjohnweldon artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores
AT rogerstracey artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores
AT maslenben artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores
AT jordanneil artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores