Cargando…
Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores
Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-pred...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01156-0 |
_version_ | 1783568921077481472 |
---|---|
author | Radford, Cameron McNutt, John Weldon Rogers, Tracey Maslen, Ben Jordan, Neil |
author_facet | Radford, Cameron McNutt, John Weldon Rogers, Tracey Maslen, Ben Jordan, Neil |
author_sort | Radford, Cameron |
collection | PubMed |
description | Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-predator eyespots do not occur naturally in contemporary mammals. Here we show that eyespots painted on cattle rumps were associated with reduced attacks by ambush carnivores (lions and leopards). Cattle painted with eyespots were significantly more likely to survive than were cross-marked and unmarked cattle, despite all treatment groups being similarly exposed to predation risk. While higher survival of eyespot-painted cattle supports the detection hypothesis, increased survival of cross-marked cattle suggests an effect of novel and conspicuous marks more generally. To our knowledge, this is the first time eyespots have been shown to deter large mammalian predators. Applying artificial marks to high-value livestock may therefore represent a cost-effective tool to reduce livestock predation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7414152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74141522020-08-14 Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores Radford, Cameron McNutt, John Weldon Rogers, Tracey Maslen, Ben Jordan, Neil Commun Biol Article Eyespots evolved independently in many taxa as anti-predator signals. There remains debate regarding whether eyespots function as diversion targets, predator mimics, conspicuous startling signals, deceptive detection, or a combination. Although eye patterns and gaze modify human behaviour, anti-predator eyespots do not occur naturally in contemporary mammals. Here we show that eyespots painted on cattle rumps were associated with reduced attacks by ambush carnivores (lions and leopards). Cattle painted with eyespots were significantly more likely to survive than were cross-marked and unmarked cattle, despite all treatment groups being similarly exposed to predation risk. While higher survival of eyespot-painted cattle supports the detection hypothesis, increased survival of cross-marked cattle suggests an effect of novel and conspicuous marks more generally. To our knowledge, this is the first time eyespots have been shown to deter large mammalian predators. Applying artificial marks to high-value livestock may therefore represent a cost-effective tool to reduce livestock predation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7414152/ /pubmed/32770111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01156-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Radford, Cameron McNutt, John Weldon Rogers, Tracey Maslen, Ben Jordan, Neil Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
title | Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
title_full | Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
title_fullStr | Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
title_short | Artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
title_sort | artificial eyespots on cattle reduce predation by large carnivores |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770111 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01156-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radfordcameron artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores AT mcnuttjohnweldon artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores AT rogerstracey artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores AT maslenben artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores AT jordanneil artificialeyespotsoncattlereducepredationbylargecarnivores |