Cargando…

Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems

BACKGROUND: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yixiang, Zhu, Paiyi, Chen, Lijin, Wang, Xin, Valentijn, Pim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2
_version_ 1783568994941272064
author Huang, Yixiang
Zhu, Paiyi
Chen, Lijin
Wang, Xin
Valentijn, Pim
author_facet Huang, Yixiang
Zhu, Paiyi
Chen, Lijin
Wang, Xin
Valentijn, Pim
author_sort Huang, Yixiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. METHODS: The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1610 community care professionals in all 79 community health stations in the Nanshan district. We analyzed the distribution of responses to each item to study the psychometric sensitivity. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis extraction method and promax rotation was used to assess the construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. Lastly, confirmation factor analysis was used to evaluate the exploratory factor analysis model fit. RESULTS: During the translation and adaptation process, all 48 items were retained with some detailed modifications. No item was found to have psychometric sensitivity problems. Six factors (person- & community-centeredness, care integration, professional integration, organizational integration, cultural competence and technical competence) with 45 items were determined by exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 61.46% of the total variance. A standard Cronbach’s alpha of 0.940 and significant correlation among all items in the scale (> 0.4) showed good internal consistency reliability of the tool. And, the model passed the majority of goodness-to-fit test by confirmation factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the validation of the Chinese RMIC-MT provider version. Its application in China will promote the development of people-centered integrated primary care. However, further psychometric testing is needed in multiple primary care settings with both public and private community institutes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7414573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74145732020-08-10 Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems Huang, Yixiang Zhu, Paiyi Chen, Lijin Wang, Xin Valentijn, Pim BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. METHODS: The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1610 community care professionals in all 79 community health stations in the Nanshan district. We analyzed the distribution of responses to each item to study the psychometric sensitivity. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis extraction method and promax rotation was used to assess the construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. Lastly, confirmation factor analysis was used to evaluate the exploratory factor analysis model fit. RESULTS: During the translation and adaptation process, all 48 items were retained with some detailed modifications. No item was found to have psychometric sensitivity problems. Six factors (person- & community-centeredness, care integration, professional integration, organizational integration, cultural competence and technical competence) with 45 items were determined by exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 61.46% of the total variance. A standard Cronbach’s alpha of 0.940 and significant correlation among all items in the scale (> 0.4) showed good internal consistency reliability of the tool. And, the model passed the majority of goodness-to-fit test by confirmation factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the validation of the Chinese RMIC-MT provider version. Its application in China will promote the development of people-centered integrated primary care. However, further psychometric testing is needed in multiple primary care settings with both public and private community institutes. BioMed Central 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7414573/ /pubmed/32770995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang, Yixiang
Zhu, Paiyi
Chen, Lijin
Wang, Xin
Valentijn, Pim
Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_full Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_fullStr Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_short Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
title_sort validation of the care providers version of the rainbow model of integrated care-measurement tool in chinese primary care systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyixiang validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT zhupaiyi validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT chenlijin validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT wangxin validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems
AT valentijnpim validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems