Cargando…
Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems
BACKGROUND: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2 |
_version_ | 1783568994941272064 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Yixiang Zhu, Paiyi Chen, Lijin Wang, Xin Valentijn, Pim |
author_facet | Huang, Yixiang Zhu, Paiyi Chen, Lijin Wang, Xin Valentijn, Pim |
author_sort | Huang, Yixiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. METHODS: The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1610 community care professionals in all 79 community health stations in the Nanshan district. We analyzed the distribution of responses to each item to study the psychometric sensitivity. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis extraction method and promax rotation was used to assess the construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. Lastly, confirmation factor analysis was used to evaluate the exploratory factor analysis model fit. RESULTS: During the translation and adaptation process, all 48 items were retained with some detailed modifications. No item was found to have psychometric sensitivity problems. Six factors (person- & community-centeredness, care integration, professional integration, organizational integration, cultural competence and technical competence) with 45 items were determined by exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 61.46% of the total variance. A standard Cronbach’s alpha of 0.940 and significant correlation among all items in the scale (> 0.4) showed good internal consistency reliability of the tool. And, the model passed the majority of goodness-to-fit test by confirmation factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the validation of the Chinese RMIC-MT provider version. Its application in China will promote the development of people-centered integrated primary care. However, further psychometric testing is needed in multiple primary care settings with both public and private community institutes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7414573 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74145732020-08-10 Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems Huang, Yixiang Zhu, Paiyi Chen, Lijin Wang, Xin Valentijn, Pim BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The original Rainbow Model of Integrated Care Measurement Tool (RMIC-MT) is based on the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care (RMIC), which provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for integrated care. To translate and adapt the original care provider version of the RMIC-MT and evaluate its psychometric properties by a pilot study in Chinese primary care systems. METHODS: The translation and adaptation process were performed in four steps, forward and back-translation, experts review and pre-testing. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 1610 community care professionals in all 79 community health stations in the Nanshan district. We analyzed the distribution of responses to each item to study the psychometric sensitivity. Exploratory factor analysis with principal axis extraction method and promax rotation was used to assess the construct validity. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to ascertain the internal consistency reliability. Lastly, confirmation factor analysis was used to evaluate the exploratory factor analysis model fit. RESULTS: During the translation and adaptation process, all 48 items were retained with some detailed modifications. No item was found to have psychometric sensitivity problems. Six factors (person- & community-centeredness, care integration, professional integration, organizational integration, cultural competence and technical competence) with 45 items were determined by exploratory factor analysis, accounting for 61.46% of the total variance. A standard Cronbach’s alpha of 0.940 and significant correlation among all items in the scale (> 0.4) showed good internal consistency reliability of the tool. And, the model passed the majority of goodness-to-fit test by confirmation factor analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed initial satisfactory psychometric properties for the validation of the Chinese RMIC-MT provider version. Its application in China will promote the development of people-centered integrated primary care. However, further psychometric testing is needed in multiple primary care settings with both public and private community institutes. BioMed Central 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7414573/ /pubmed/32770995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Yixiang Zhu, Paiyi Chen, Lijin Wang, Xin Valentijn, Pim Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems |
title | Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems |
title_full | Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems |
title_fullStr | Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems |
title_short | Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems |
title_sort | validation of the care providers version of the rainbow model of integrated care-measurement tool in chinese primary care systems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414573/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangyixiang validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems AT zhupaiyi validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems AT chenlijin validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems AT wangxin validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems AT valentijnpim validationofthecareprovidersversionoftherainbowmodelofintegratedcaremeasurementtoolinchineseprimarycaresystems |