Cargando…

Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the electrical performance and properties of commercially available electroretinography (ERG) electrodes. METHODS: A passive ionic model was used to measure impedance, noise, and potential drift in 10 types of ocular surface and skin ERG ele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Man, Tony T. C., Yip, Yolanda W. Y., Cheung, Frederick K. F., Lee, Wing Sze, Pang, Chi Pui, Brelén, Mårten Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.7.45
_version_ 1783569004047106048
author Man, Tony T. C.
Yip, Yolanda W. Y.
Cheung, Frederick K. F.
Lee, Wing Sze
Pang, Chi Pui
Brelén, Mårten Erik
author_facet Man, Tony T. C.
Yip, Yolanda W. Y.
Cheung, Frederick K. F.
Lee, Wing Sze
Pang, Chi Pui
Brelén, Mårten Erik
author_sort Man, Tony T. C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the electrical performance and properties of commercially available electroretinography (ERG) electrodes. METHODS: A passive ionic model was used to measure impedance, noise, and potential drift in 10 types of ocular surface and skin ERG electrodes. RESULTS: The impedance for silver-based ocular electrodes are generally lower (range, 65.35–343.3 Ω) with smaller phase angles (range, −6.41° to −33.91°) than gold-based electrodes (impedance ranged from 285.95 Ω to 2.913 kΩ, and phase angle ranged from −59.65° to −70.01°). Silver-based ocular electrodes have less noise (median line noise of 6.48 x 10(4)nV(2)/Hz) than gold-based electrodes (median line noise of 2.26 x 10(5)nV(2)/Hz). Although silver-based electrodes usually achieve a drift rate less than 5 µV/s within 15 minutes, gold-base ocular electrode cannot achieve a stable potential. The exception is the RETeval strip type of silver electrode, which had an unusual drift at 20 minutes. The noise spectral density showed no change over time indicating that noise was not dependent on the stabilization of the electrode. CONCLUSIONS: From the range of electrodes tested, lower impedance, lower capacitance, and lower noise was observed in silver-based electrodes. Stabilization of an electrode is effective against drift of the electrode potential difference but not the noise. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Application of electrodes with optimized materials improve the quality of clinical electrophysiology signals and efficiency of the recording.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7414618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74146182020-08-21 Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes Man, Tony T. C. Yip, Yolanda W. Y. Cheung, Frederick K. F. Lee, Wing Sze Pang, Chi Pui Brelén, Mårten Erik Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the electrical performance and properties of commercially available electroretinography (ERG) electrodes. METHODS: A passive ionic model was used to measure impedance, noise, and potential drift in 10 types of ocular surface and skin ERG electrodes. RESULTS: The impedance for silver-based ocular electrodes are generally lower (range, 65.35–343.3 Ω) with smaller phase angles (range, −6.41° to −33.91°) than gold-based electrodes (impedance ranged from 285.95 Ω to 2.913 kΩ, and phase angle ranged from −59.65° to −70.01°). Silver-based ocular electrodes have less noise (median line noise of 6.48 x 10(4)nV(2)/Hz) than gold-based electrodes (median line noise of 2.26 x 10(5)nV(2)/Hz). Although silver-based electrodes usually achieve a drift rate less than 5 µV/s within 15 minutes, gold-base ocular electrode cannot achieve a stable potential. The exception is the RETeval strip type of silver electrode, which had an unusual drift at 20 minutes. The noise spectral density showed no change over time indicating that noise was not dependent on the stabilization of the electrode. CONCLUSIONS: From the range of electrodes tested, lower impedance, lower capacitance, and lower noise was observed in silver-based electrodes. Stabilization of an electrode is effective against drift of the electrode potential difference but not the noise. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Application of electrodes with optimized materials improve the quality of clinical electrophysiology signals and efficiency of the recording. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7414618/ /pubmed/32832250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.7.45 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Man, Tony T. C.
Yip, Yolanda W. Y.
Cheung, Frederick K. F.
Lee, Wing Sze
Pang, Chi Pui
Brelén, Mårten Erik
Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes
title Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes
title_full Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes
title_fullStr Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes
title_short Evaluation of Electrical Performance and Properties of Electroretinography Electrodes
title_sort evaluation of electrical performance and properties of electroretinography electrodes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.7.45
work_keys_str_mv AT mantonytc evaluationofelectricalperformanceandpropertiesofelectroretinographyelectrodes
AT yipyolandawy evaluationofelectricalperformanceandpropertiesofelectroretinographyelectrodes
AT cheungfrederickkf evaluationofelectricalperformanceandpropertiesofelectroretinographyelectrodes
AT leewingsze evaluationofelectricalperformanceandpropertiesofelectroretinographyelectrodes
AT pangchipui evaluationofelectricalperformanceandpropertiesofelectroretinographyelectrodes
AT brelenmartenerik evaluationofelectricalperformanceandpropertiesofelectroretinographyelectrodes