Cargando…

A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs

PURPOSE: Optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation are fundamental for fundus image analysis. Manual annotation is time consuming, expensive, and highly subjective, whereas an automated system is invaluable to the medical community. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning system to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Huazhu, Li, Fei, Xu, Yanwu, Liao, Jingan, Xiong, Jian, Shen, Jianbing, Liu, Jiang, Zhang, Xiulan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.33
_version_ 1783569024273088512
author Fu, Huazhu
Li, Fei
Xu, Yanwu
Liao, Jingan
Xiong, Jian
Shen, Jianbing
Liu, Jiang
Zhang, Xiulan
author_facet Fu, Huazhu
Li, Fei
Xu, Yanwu
Liao, Jingan
Xiong, Jian
Shen, Jianbing
Liu, Jiang
Zhang, Xiulan
author_sort Fu, Huazhu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation are fundamental for fundus image analysis. Manual annotation is time consuming, expensive, and highly subjective, whereas an automated system is invaluable to the medical community. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning system to segment OD and OC in fundus photographs, and evaluate how the algorithm compares against manual annotations. METHODS: A total of 1200 fundus photographs with 120 glaucoma cases were collected. The OD and OC annotations were labeled by seven licensed ophthalmologists, and glaucoma diagnoses were based on comprehensive evaluations of the subject medical records. A deep learning system for OD and OC segmentation was developed. The performances of segmentation and glaucoma discriminating based on the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of automated model were compared against the manual annotations. RESULTS: The algorithm achieved an OD dice of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.934–0.941), OC dice of 0.801 (95% CI = 0.793–0.809), and CDR mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.077 (95% CI = 0.073 mean absolute error (MAE)0.082). For glaucoma discriminating based on CDR calculations, the algorithm obtained an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI = 0.920 mean absolute error (MAE)0.973), with a sensitivity of 0.850 (95% CI = 0.794–0.923) and specificity of 0.853 (95% CI = 0.798–0.918). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential of the deep learning system to assist ophthalmologists in analyzing OD and OC segmentation and discriminating glaucoma from nonglaucoma subjects based on CDR calculations. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: We investigate the segmentation of OD and OC by deep learning system compared against the manual annotations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7414704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74147042020-08-21 A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs Fu, Huazhu Li, Fei Xu, Yanwu Liao, Jingan Xiong, Jian Shen, Jianbing Liu, Jiang Zhang, Xiulan Transl Vis Sci Technol Special Issue PURPOSE: Optic disc (OD) and optic cup (OC) segmentation are fundamental for fundus image analysis. Manual annotation is time consuming, expensive, and highly subjective, whereas an automated system is invaluable to the medical community. The aim of this study is to develop a deep learning system to segment OD and OC in fundus photographs, and evaluate how the algorithm compares against manual annotations. METHODS: A total of 1200 fundus photographs with 120 glaucoma cases were collected. The OD and OC annotations were labeled by seven licensed ophthalmologists, and glaucoma diagnoses were based on comprehensive evaluations of the subject medical records. A deep learning system for OD and OC segmentation was developed. The performances of segmentation and glaucoma discriminating based on the cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of automated model were compared against the manual annotations. RESULTS: The algorithm achieved an OD dice of 0.938 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.934–0.941), OC dice of 0.801 (95% CI = 0.793–0.809), and CDR mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.077 (95% CI = 0.073 mean absolute error (MAE)0.082). For glaucoma discriminating based on CDR calculations, the algorithm obtained an area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.948 (95% CI = 0.920 mean absolute error (MAE)0.973), with a sensitivity of 0.850 (95% CI = 0.794–0.923) and specificity of 0.853 (95% CI = 0.798–0.918). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the potential of the deep learning system to assist ophthalmologists in analyzing OD and OC segmentation and discriminating glaucoma from nonglaucoma subjects based on CDR calculations. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: We investigate the segmentation of OD and OC by deep learning system compared against the manual annotations. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7414704/ /pubmed/32832206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.33 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Special Issue
Fu, Huazhu
Li, Fei
Xu, Yanwu
Liao, Jingan
Xiong, Jian
Shen, Jianbing
Liu, Jiang
Zhang, Xiulan
A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs
title A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs
title_full A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs
title_fullStr A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs
title_short A Retrospective Comparison of Deep Learning to Manual Annotations for Optic Disc and Optic Cup Segmentation in Fundus Photographs
title_sort retrospective comparison of deep learning to manual annotations for optic disc and optic cup segmentation in fundus photographs
topic Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.33
work_keys_str_mv AT fuhuazhu aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT lifei aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT xuyanwu aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT liaojingan aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT xiongjian aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT shenjianbing aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT liujiang aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT zhangxiulan aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT aretrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT fuhuazhu retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT lifei retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT xuyanwu retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT liaojingan retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT xiongjian retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT shenjianbing retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT liujiang retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT zhangxiulan retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs
AT retrospectivecomparisonofdeeplearningtomanualannotationsforopticdiscandopticcupsegmentationinfundusphotographs