Cargando…
Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a politic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031 |
_version_ | 1783569086940184576 |
---|---|
author | Ashokkumar, Ashwini Talaifar, Sanaz Fraser, William T. Landabur, Rodrigo Buhrmester, Michael Gómez, Ángel Paredes, Borja Swann, William B. |
author_facet | Ashokkumar, Ashwini Talaifar, Sanaz Fraser, William T. Landabur, Rodrigo Buhrmester, Michael Gómez, Ángel Paredes, Borja Swann, William B. |
author_sort | Ashokkumar, Ashwini |
collection | PubMed |
description | As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a political cause (e.g., abortion or gun rights) preferentially censored comments that opposed their cause. The tendency to selectively censor cause-incongruent online content was amplified among people whose cause-related beliefs were deeply rooted in or “fused with” their identities. Moreover, six additional identity-related measures also amplified the selective censoring effect. Finally, selective censoring emerged even when opposing comments were inoffensive and courteous. We suggest that because online censorship enacted by moderators can skew online content consumed by millions of users, it can systematically disrupt democratic dialogue and subvert social harmony. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7415017 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74150172020-08-10 Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why Ashokkumar, Ashwini Talaifar, Sanaz Fraser, William T. Landabur, Rodrigo Buhrmester, Michael Gómez, Ángel Paredes, Borja Swann, William B. J Exp Soc Psychol Article As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a political cause (e.g., abortion or gun rights) preferentially censored comments that opposed their cause. The tendency to selectively censor cause-incongruent online content was amplified among people whose cause-related beliefs were deeply rooted in or “fused with” their identities. Moreover, six additional identity-related measures also amplified the selective censoring effect. Finally, selective censoring emerged even when opposing comments were inoffensive and courteous. We suggest that because online censorship enacted by moderators can skew online content consumed by millions of users, it can systematically disrupt democratic dialogue and subvert social harmony. Elsevier Inc. 2020-11 2020-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7415017/ /pubmed/32834107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Ashokkumar, Ashwini Talaifar, Sanaz Fraser, William T. Landabur, Rodrigo Buhrmester, Michael Gómez, Ángel Paredes, Borja Swann, William B. Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why |
title | Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why |
title_full | Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why |
title_fullStr | Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why |
title_full_unstemmed | Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why |
title_short | Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why |
title_sort | censoring political opposition online: who does it and why |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415017/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashokkumarashwini censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT talaifarsanaz censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT fraserwilliamt censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT landaburrodrigo censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT buhrmestermichael censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT gomezangel censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT paredesborja censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy AT swannwilliamb censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy |