Cargando…

Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why

As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a politic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashokkumar, Ashwini, Talaifar, Sanaz, Fraser, William T., Landabur, Rodrigo, Buhrmester, Michael, Gómez, Ángel, Paredes, Borja, Swann, William B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031
_version_ 1783569086940184576
author Ashokkumar, Ashwini
Talaifar, Sanaz
Fraser, William T.
Landabur, Rodrigo
Buhrmester, Michael
Gómez, Ángel
Paredes, Borja
Swann, William B.
author_facet Ashokkumar, Ashwini
Talaifar, Sanaz
Fraser, William T.
Landabur, Rodrigo
Buhrmester, Michael
Gómez, Ángel
Paredes, Borja
Swann, William B.
author_sort Ashokkumar, Ashwini
collection PubMed
description As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a political cause (e.g., abortion or gun rights) preferentially censored comments that opposed their cause. The tendency to selectively censor cause-incongruent online content was amplified among people whose cause-related beliefs were deeply rooted in or “fused with” their identities. Moreover, six additional identity-related measures also amplified the selective censoring effect. Finally, selective censoring emerged even when opposing comments were inoffensive and courteous. We suggest that because online censorship enacted by moderators can skew online content consumed by millions of users, it can systematically disrupt democratic dialogue and subvert social harmony.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7415017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74150172020-08-10 Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why Ashokkumar, Ashwini Talaifar, Sanaz Fraser, William T. Landabur, Rodrigo Buhrmester, Michael Gómez, Ángel Paredes, Borja Swann, William B. J Exp Soc Psychol Article As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a political cause (e.g., abortion or gun rights) preferentially censored comments that opposed their cause. The tendency to selectively censor cause-incongruent online content was amplified among people whose cause-related beliefs were deeply rooted in or “fused with” their identities. Moreover, six additional identity-related measures also amplified the selective censoring effect. Finally, selective censoring emerged even when opposing comments were inoffensive and courteous. We suggest that because online censorship enacted by moderators can skew online content consumed by millions of users, it can systematically disrupt democratic dialogue and subvert social harmony. Elsevier Inc. 2020-11 2020-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7415017/ /pubmed/32834107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ashokkumar, Ashwini
Talaifar, Sanaz
Fraser, William T.
Landabur, Rodrigo
Buhrmester, Michael
Gómez, Ángel
Paredes, Borja
Swann, William B.
Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
title Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
title_full Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
title_fullStr Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
title_full_unstemmed Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
title_short Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why
title_sort censoring political opposition online: who does it and why
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031
work_keys_str_mv AT ashokkumarashwini censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT talaifarsanaz censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT fraserwilliamt censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT landaburrodrigo censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT buhrmestermichael censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT gomezangel censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT paredesborja censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy
AT swannwilliamb censoringpoliticaloppositiononlinewhodoesitandwhy