Cargando…
An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
BACKGROUND: The nature of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the scarcity of data on this issue have made reports on clinical and epidemiological features of PCL injuries valuable. We aimed to report our experiences with PCL injuries in our region. METHODS: Any patient who referred with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6 |
_version_ | 1783569119939919872 |
---|---|
author | Razi, Mohammad Ghaffari, Saman Askari, Alireza Arasteh, Peyman Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei Dadgostar, Haleh |
author_facet | Razi, Mohammad Ghaffari, Saman Askari, Alireza Arasteh, Peyman Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei Dadgostar, Haleh |
author_sort | Razi, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The nature of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the scarcity of data on this issue have made reports on clinical and epidemiological features of PCL injuries valuable. We aimed to report our experiences with PCL injuries in our region. METHODS: Any patient who referred with a diagnosis of PCL rupture from 2004 to 2018 to our center, was included in this report. We evaluated pre- and postoperative outcomes and compared patients with isolated and combined (multi-ligament) PCL injuries. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were included in our study. Majority of patients were men (87.2%). Mean age of patients was 28.12 ± 8.53 years old. Average follow-up period was 28.83 ± 20.62 months and mean duration between trauma and surgery was 27.8 ± 38.0 months. Most common cause of PCL injury was traffic accidents (70.9%) followed by sports injuries (5.5%). Majority of patients (69.1%) had combined PCL injuries. Majority of patients underwent single tibial-double femoral tunnel reconstruction (56.4%), followed by single tibial-single femoral tunnel (34.5%) reconstruction. Allografts were used in 60% of patient. Average Cincinnati knee rating scale (CKRC) was 35.87 ± 11.4, which improved significantly after PCL reconstruction (79.45 ± 11.90, p < 0.001). Full range of motion only existed in 29.1% of patient prior to surgery, which improved after surgery (92.7%, p < 0.001). Three patients had postoperative arthrofibrosis and motion stiffness, 1 had deep vein thrombosis and 3 patients had infections. Those with isolated PCL injuries had higher pre-operative CKRS (42.05 ± 8.96 vs. 33.10 ± 11.45, p = 0.006) and lower pre-operative posterior drawer test (2.76 ± 0.43 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, p = 0.042) compared to those with combined injuries. CONCLUSION: Today with advances in surgical techniques, considering treatment of collateral ligament injuries, use of stronger allografts and more secure fixation methods, better rehabilitation programs and early range of motion, results of reconstruction of the PCL has become very promising. Accordingly we recommend surgical treatment even for isolated PCL tears, with the goal to prevent functional deficit and to prevent degenerative arthritis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7415183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74151832020-08-10 An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery Razi, Mohammad Ghaffari, Saman Askari, Alireza Arasteh, Peyman Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei Dadgostar, Haleh BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The nature of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the scarcity of data on this issue have made reports on clinical and epidemiological features of PCL injuries valuable. We aimed to report our experiences with PCL injuries in our region. METHODS: Any patient who referred with a diagnosis of PCL rupture from 2004 to 2018 to our center, was included in this report. We evaluated pre- and postoperative outcomes and compared patients with isolated and combined (multi-ligament) PCL injuries. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were included in our study. Majority of patients were men (87.2%). Mean age of patients was 28.12 ± 8.53 years old. Average follow-up period was 28.83 ± 20.62 months and mean duration between trauma and surgery was 27.8 ± 38.0 months. Most common cause of PCL injury was traffic accidents (70.9%) followed by sports injuries (5.5%). Majority of patients (69.1%) had combined PCL injuries. Majority of patients underwent single tibial-double femoral tunnel reconstruction (56.4%), followed by single tibial-single femoral tunnel (34.5%) reconstruction. Allografts were used in 60% of patient. Average Cincinnati knee rating scale (CKRC) was 35.87 ± 11.4, which improved significantly after PCL reconstruction (79.45 ± 11.90, p < 0.001). Full range of motion only existed in 29.1% of patient prior to surgery, which improved after surgery (92.7%, p < 0.001). Three patients had postoperative arthrofibrosis and motion stiffness, 1 had deep vein thrombosis and 3 patients had infections. Those with isolated PCL injuries had higher pre-operative CKRS (42.05 ± 8.96 vs. 33.10 ± 11.45, p = 0.006) and lower pre-operative posterior drawer test (2.76 ± 0.43 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, p = 0.042) compared to those with combined injuries. CONCLUSION: Today with advances in surgical techniques, considering treatment of collateral ligament injuries, use of stronger allografts and more secure fixation methods, better rehabilitation programs and early range of motion, results of reconstruction of the PCL has become very promising. Accordingly we recommend surgical treatment even for isolated PCL tears, with the goal to prevent functional deficit and to prevent degenerative arthritis. BioMed Central 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7415183/ /pubmed/32770989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Razi, Mohammad Ghaffari, Saman Askari, Alireza Arasteh, Peyman Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei Dadgostar, Haleh An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
title | An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
title_full | An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
title_short | An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
title_sort | evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT razimohammad anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT ghaffarisaman anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT askarialireza anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT arastehpeyman anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT ziabarielahehziaei anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT dadgostarhaleh anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT razimohammad evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT ghaffarisaman evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT askarialireza evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT arastehpeyman evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT ziabarielahehziaei evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery AT dadgostarhaleh evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery |