Cargando…

An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery

BACKGROUND: The nature of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the scarcity of data on this issue have made reports on clinical and epidemiological features of PCL injuries valuable. We aimed to report our experiences with PCL injuries in our region. METHODS: Any patient who referred with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Razi, Mohammad, Ghaffari, Saman, Askari, Alireza, Arasteh, Peyman, Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei, Dadgostar, Haleh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6
_version_ 1783569119939919872
author Razi, Mohammad
Ghaffari, Saman
Askari, Alireza
Arasteh, Peyman
Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei
Dadgostar, Haleh
author_facet Razi, Mohammad
Ghaffari, Saman
Askari, Alireza
Arasteh, Peyman
Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei
Dadgostar, Haleh
author_sort Razi, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The nature of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the scarcity of data on this issue have made reports on clinical and epidemiological features of PCL injuries valuable. We aimed to report our experiences with PCL injuries in our region. METHODS: Any patient who referred with a diagnosis of PCL rupture from 2004 to 2018 to our center, was included in this report. We evaluated pre- and postoperative outcomes and compared patients with isolated and combined (multi-ligament) PCL injuries. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were included in our study. Majority of patients were men (87.2%). Mean age of patients was 28.12 ± 8.53 years old. Average follow-up period was 28.83 ± 20.62 months and mean duration between trauma and surgery was 27.8 ± 38.0 months. Most common cause of PCL injury was traffic accidents (70.9%) followed by sports injuries (5.5%). Majority of patients (69.1%) had combined PCL injuries. Majority of patients underwent single tibial-double femoral tunnel reconstruction (56.4%), followed by single tibial-single femoral tunnel (34.5%) reconstruction. Allografts were used in 60% of patient. Average Cincinnati knee rating scale (CKRC) was 35.87 ± 11.4, which improved significantly after PCL reconstruction (79.45 ± 11.90, p <  0.001). Full range of motion only existed in 29.1% of patient prior to surgery, which improved after surgery (92.7%, p <  0.001). Three patients had postoperative arthrofibrosis and motion stiffness, 1 had deep vein thrombosis and 3 patients had infections. Those with isolated PCL injuries had higher pre-operative CKRS (42.05 ± 8.96 vs. 33.10 ± 11.45, p = 0.006) and lower pre-operative posterior drawer test (2.76 ± 0.43 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, p = 0.042) compared to those with combined injuries. CONCLUSION: Today with advances in surgical techniques, considering treatment of collateral ligament injuries, use of stronger allografts and more secure fixation methods, better rehabilitation programs and early range of motion, results of reconstruction of the PCL has become very promising. Accordingly we recommend surgical treatment even for isolated PCL tears, with the goal to prevent functional deficit and to prevent degenerative arthritis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7415183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74151832020-08-10 An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery Razi, Mohammad Ghaffari, Saman Askari, Alireza Arasteh, Peyman Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei Dadgostar, Haleh BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The nature of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries and the scarcity of data on this issue have made reports on clinical and epidemiological features of PCL injuries valuable. We aimed to report our experiences with PCL injuries in our region. METHODS: Any patient who referred with a diagnosis of PCL rupture from 2004 to 2018 to our center, was included in this report. We evaluated pre- and postoperative outcomes and compared patients with isolated and combined (multi-ligament) PCL injuries. RESULTS: Overall, 55 patients were included in our study. Majority of patients were men (87.2%). Mean age of patients was 28.12 ± 8.53 years old. Average follow-up period was 28.83 ± 20.62 months and mean duration between trauma and surgery was 27.8 ± 38.0 months. Most common cause of PCL injury was traffic accidents (70.9%) followed by sports injuries (5.5%). Majority of patients (69.1%) had combined PCL injuries. Majority of patients underwent single tibial-double femoral tunnel reconstruction (56.4%), followed by single tibial-single femoral tunnel (34.5%) reconstruction. Allografts were used in 60% of patient. Average Cincinnati knee rating scale (CKRC) was 35.87 ± 11.4, which improved significantly after PCL reconstruction (79.45 ± 11.90, p <  0.001). Full range of motion only existed in 29.1% of patient prior to surgery, which improved after surgery (92.7%, p <  0.001). Three patients had postoperative arthrofibrosis and motion stiffness, 1 had deep vein thrombosis and 3 patients had infections. Those with isolated PCL injuries had higher pre-operative CKRS (42.05 ± 8.96 vs. 33.10 ± 11.45, p = 0.006) and lower pre-operative posterior drawer test (2.76 ± 0.43 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, p = 0.042) compared to those with combined injuries. CONCLUSION: Today with advances in surgical techniques, considering treatment of collateral ligament injuries, use of stronger allografts and more secure fixation methods, better rehabilitation programs and early range of motion, results of reconstruction of the PCL has become very promising. Accordingly we recommend surgical treatment even for isolated PCL tears, with the goal to prevent functional deficit and to prevent degenerative arthritis. BioMed Central 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7415183/ /pubmed/32770989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Razi, Mohammad
Ghaffari, Saman
Askari, Alireza
Arasteh, Peyman
Ziabari, Elaheh Ziaei
Dadgostar, Haleh
An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
title An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
title_full An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
title_fullStr An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
title_short An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
title_sort evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6
work_keys_str_mv AT razimohammad anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT ghaffarisaman anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT askarialireza anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT arastehpeyman anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT ziabarielahehziaei anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT dadgostarhaleh anevaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT razimohammad evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT ghaffarisaman evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT askarialireza evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT arastehpeyman evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT ziabarielahehziaei evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery
AT dadgostarhaleh evaluationofposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionsurgery