Cargando…

The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages

Given the important roles that seed‐borne endophytes can play on their plant hosts, comprehensive studies of the bacterial and fungal communities of seeds are of great importance. In this study, we assessed the seed endophytes of three gramineous (Avena sativa, Elymus sibiricus and Elymus dahuricus)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Ya, Li, Xin‐Yu, Wang, Yan, Li, Cai‐Xia, He, Yuan, Lin, Hong‐Hui, Wang, Tao, Ma, Xin‐Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13618
_version_ 1783569160451653632
author Dai, Ya
Li, Xin‐Yu
Wang, Yan
Li, Cai‐Xia
He, Yuan
Lin, Hong‐Hui
Wang, Tao
Ma, Xin‐Rong
author_facet Dai, Ya
Li, Xin‐Yu
Wang, Yan
Li, Cai‐Xia
He, Yuan
Lin, Hong‐Hui
Wang, Tao
Ma, Xin‐Rong
author_sort Dai, Ya
collection PubMed
description Given the important roles that seed‐borne endophytes can play on their plant hosts, comprehensive studies of the bacterial and fungal communities of seeds are of great importance. In this study, we assessed the seed endophytes of three gramineous (Avena sativa, Elymus sibiricus and Elymus dahuricus) and four leguminous (Vicia villosa, Trifolium repens, Trifolium pretense and Medicago sativa) forages using high‐throughput sequencing. In total, 1013 distinct bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and 922 fungal OTUs were detected, with bacteria and fungi per sample ranging from 240 to 425 and 261 to 463 respectively. These seven forages shared a high number of potentially beneficial taxa, including Bacillus, Pantoea, Candida and Helotiales, but the relative proportion of these taxa was different in each seed. Fungal communities were clustered more distinctively by host genotypes than bacterial. Some bacterial taxa may be involved in the recruitment of genera from the same phylum. Three Pantoea sp. and five Bacillus sp. were isolated from seeds, and all showed positive effects on Medicago sativa germination rate under salt stress, and of these, Bacillus subtilis Es‐1 and Pantoea agglomerans Ed‐3 performed best, but their influence was affected by the seed’s microbiome. Rather than simply promoting host plant growth directly, some taxa may also participate in organizing the assembly of plant microbiomes which will influence seed response to biological factors. This study uses a new, high‐throughput sequencing based strategy to identify beneficial strains and analyse the interactions between microorganisms and plants to maximize microbial functions in long‐term agricultural practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7415374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74153742020-08-10 The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages Dai, Ya Li, Xin‐Yu Wang, Yan Li, Cai‐Xia He, Yuan Lin, Hong‐Hui Wang, Tao Ma, Xin‐Rong Microb Biotechnol Research Articles Given the important roles that seed‐borne endophytes can play on their plant hosts, comprehensive studies of the bacterial and fungal communities of seeds are of great importance. In this study, we assessed the seed endophytes of three gramineous (Avena sativa, Elymus sibiricus and Elymus dahuricus) and four leguminous (Vicia villosa, Trifolium repens, Trifolium pretense and Medicago sativa) forages using high‐throughput sequencing. In total, 1013 distinct bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and 922 fungal OTUs were detected, with bacteria and fungi per sample ranging from 240 to 425 and 261 to 463 respectively. These seven forages shared a high number of potentially beneficial taxa, including Bacillus, Pantoea, Candida and Helotiales, but the relative proportion of these taxa was different in each seed. Fungal communities were clustered more distinctively by host genotypes than bacterial. Some bacterial taxa may be involved in the recruitment of genera from the same phylum. Three Pantoea sp. and five Bacillus sp. were isolated from seeds, and all showed positive effects on Medicago sativa germination rate under salt stress, and of these, Bacillus subtilis Es‐1 and Pantoea agglomerans Ed‐3 performed best, but their influence was affected by the seed’s microbiome. Rather than simply promoting host plant growth directly, some taxa may also participate in organizing the assembly of plant microbiomes which will influence seed response to biological factors. This study uses a new, high‐throughput sequencing based strategy to identify beneficial strains and analyse the interactions between microorganisms and plants to maximize microbial functions in long‐term agricultural practices. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7415374/ /pubmed/32643276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13618 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Dai, Ya
Li, Xin‐Yu
Wang, Yan
Li, Cai‐Xia
He, Yuan
Lin, Hong‐Hui
Wang, Tao
Ma, Xin‐Rong
The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages
title The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages
title_full The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages
title_fullStr The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages
title_full_unstemmed The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages
title_short The differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages
title_sort differences and overlaps in the seed‐resident microbiome of four leguminous and three gramineous forages
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13618
work_keys_str_mv AT daiya thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT lixinyu thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT wangyan thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT licaixia thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT heyuan thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT linhonghui thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT wangtao thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT maxinrong thedifferencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT daiya differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT lixinyu differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT wangyan differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT licaixia differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT heyuan differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT linhonghui differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT wangtao differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages
AT maxinrong differencesandoverlapsintheseedresidentmicrobiomeoffourleguminousandthreegramineousforages