Cargando…

Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center

In Japan, pregnant women are diagnosed as obese if the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) is ≥25 kg/m(2). However, this is different from other countries. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) classifies prepregnancy BMI as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overwei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugimura, Ryo, Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko, Narumi, Megumi, Furuta-Isomura, Naomi, Oda, Tomoaki, Tamura, Naoaki, Uchida, Toshiyuki, Suzuki, Kazunao, Sugimura, Motoi, Kanayama, Naohiro, Itoh, Hiroaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788879
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.47076
_version_ 1783569164945850368
author Sugimura, Ryo
Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko
Narumi, Megumi
Furuta-Isomura, Naomi
Oda, Tomoaki
Tamura, Naoaki
Uchida, Toshiyuki
Suzuki, Kazunao
Sugimura, Motoi
Kanayama, Naohiro
Itoh, Hiroaki
author_facet Sugimura, Ryo
Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko
Narumi, Megumi
Furuta-Isomura, Naomi
Oda, Tomoaki
Tamura, Naoaki
Uchida, Toshiyuki
Suzuki, Kazunao
Sugimura, Motoi
Kanayama, Naohiro
Itoh, Hiroaki
author_sort Sugimura, Ryo
collection PubMed
description In Japan, pregnant women are diagnosed as obese if the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) is ≥25 kg/m(2). However, this is different from other countries. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) classifies prepregnancy BMI as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)). In addition to these four categories, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) classifies prepregnancy BMI as obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)), obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)), and obesity class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare obstetric outcomes by the three different categorizations in 6,066 pregnant women who gave birth between 2010 and 2019. According to Japanese classification, 668 (11%) pregnant women were classified as obese, and significant odds ratios (OR) were observed for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; 3.32), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; 3.39), large for gestational age (LGA; 2.91), and macrosomia (4.01). According to the classification of IOM, 474 (7.8%) and 194 (3.1%) were classified as overweight and obese pregnant women, respectively. Specifically, a high OR was observed in obese pregnant women for HDP (5.85) and GDM (5.0). ACOG classification categorized 474 (7.8%) pregnant women as overweight, 141 (2.3%) as obesity class I, 41 (0.6%) as obesity class II, and 12 (0.2%) as obesity class III. In obesity class III, a significantly high OR was observed for HDP (12.89), GDM (8.37), and LGA (5.74). The Japanese classification may be useful for low-risk pregnancies, whereas IOM classification may be applicable to identify high-risk pregnancies. ACOG criteria may be useful for step-wise assessments of HDP and GDM risks in Japanese pregnant women; however, the number of class II and III obese pregnant women was small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7415393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74153932020-08-11 Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center Sugimura, Ryo Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko Narumi, Megumi Furuta-Isomura, Naomi Oda, Tomoaki Tamura, Naoaki Uchida, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Kazunao Sugimura, Motoi Kanayama, Naohiro Itoh, Hiroaki Int J Med Sci Research Paper In Japan, pregnant women are diagnosed as obese if the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) is ≥25 kg/m(2). However, this is different from other countries. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) classifies prepregnancy BMI as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)). In addition to these four categories, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) classifies prepregnancy BMI as obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)), obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)), and obesity class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare obstetric outcomes by the three different categorizations in 6,066 pregnant women who gave birth between 2010 and 2019. According to Japanese classification, 668 (11%) pregnant women were classified as obese, and significant odds ratios (OR) were observed for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; 3.32), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; 3.39), large for gestational age (LGA; 2.91), and macrosomia (4.01). According to the classification of IOM, 474 (7.8%) and 194 (3.1%) were classified as overweight and obese pregnant women, respectively. Specifically, a high OR was observed in obese pregnant women for HDP (5.85) and GDM (5.0). ACOG classification categorized 474 (7.8%) pregnant women as overweight, 141 (2.3%) as obesity class I, 41 (0.6%) as obesity class II, and 12 (0.2%) as obesity class III. In obesity class III, a significantly high OR was observed for HDP (12.89), GDM (8.37), and LGA (5.74). The Japanese classification may be useful for low-risk pregnancies, whereas IOM classification may be applicable to identify high-risk pregnancies. ACOG criteria may be useful for step-wise assessments of HDP and GDM risks in Japanese pregnant women; however, the number of class II and III obese pregnant women was small. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7415393/ /pubmed/32788879 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.47076 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Sugimura, Ryo
Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko
Narumi, Megumi
Furuta-Isomura, Naomi
Oda, Tomoaki
Tamura, Naoaki
Uchida, Toshiyuki
Suzuki, Kazunao
Sugimura, Motoi
Kanayama, Naohiro
Itoh, Hiroaki
Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
title Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
title_full Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
title_fullStr Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
title_short Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
title_sort comparison of three classification systems of prepregnancy body mass index with perinatal outcomes in japanese obese pregnant women: a retrospective study at a single center
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788879
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.47076
work_keys_str_mv AT sugimuraryo comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT kohmurakobayashiyukiko comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT narumimegumi comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT furutaisomuranaomi comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT odatomoaki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT tamuranaoaki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT uchidatoshiyuki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT suzukikazunao comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT sugimuramotoi comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT kanayamanaohiro comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter
AT itohhiroaki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter