Cargando…
Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center
In Japan, pregnant women are diagnosed as obese if the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) is ≥25 kg/m(2). However, this is different from other countries. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) classifies prepregnancy BMI as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overwei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788879 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.47076 |
_version_ | 1783569164945850368 |
---|---|
author | Sugimura, Ryo Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko Narumi, Megumi Furuta-Isomura, Naomi Oda, Tomoaki Tamura, Naoaki Uchida, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Kazunao Sugimura, Motoi Kanayama, Naohiro Itoh, Hiroaki |
author_facet | Sugimura, Ryo Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko Narumi, Megumi Furuta-Isomura, Naomi Oda, Tomoaki Tamura, Naoaki Uchida, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Kazunao Sugimura, Motoi Kanayama, Naohiro Itoh, Hiroaki |
author_sort | Sugimura, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Japan, pregnant women are diagnosed as obese if the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) is ≥25 kg/m(2). However, this is different from other countries. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) classifies prepregnancy BMI as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)). In addition to these four categories, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) classifies prepregnancy BMI as obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)), obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)), and obesity class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare obstetric outcomes by the three different categorizations in 6,066 pregnant women who gave birth between 2010 and 2019. According to Japanese classification, 668 (11%) pregnant women were classified as obese, and significant odds ratios (OR) were observed for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; 3.32), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; 3.39), large for gestational age (LGA; 2.91), and macrosomia (4.01). According to the classification of IOM, 474 (7.8%) and 194 (3.1%) were classified as overweight and obese pregnant women, respectively. Specifically, a high OR was observed in obese pregnant women for HDP (5.85) and GDM (5.0). ACOG classification categorized 474 (7.8%) pregnant women as overweight, 141 (2.3%) as obesity class I, 41 (0.6%) as obesity class II, and 12 (0.2%) as obesity class III. In obesity class III, a significantly high OR was observed for HDP (12.89), GDM (8.37), and LGA (5.74). The Japanese classification may be useful for low-risk pregnancies, whereas IOM classification may be applicable to identify high-risk pregnancies. ACOG criteria may be useful for step-wise assessments of HDP and GDM risks in Japanese pregnant women; however, the number of class II and III obese pregnant women was small. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7415393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74153932020-08-11 Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center Sugimura, Ryo Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko Narumi, Megumi Furuta-Isomura, Naomi Oda, Tomoaki Tamura, Naoaki Uchida, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Kazunao Sugimura, Motoi Kanayama, Naohiro Itoh, Hiroaki Int J Med Sci Research Paper In Japan, pregnant women are diagnosed as obese if the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) is ≥25 kg/m(2). However, this is different from other countries. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) classifies prepregnancy BMI as underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m(2)), normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)). In addition to these four categories, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) classifies prepregnancy BMI as obesity class I (BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2)), obesity class II (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)), and obesity class III (BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare obstetric outcomes by the three different categorizations in 6,066 pregnant women who gave birth between 2010 and 2019. According to Japanese classification, 668 (11%) pregnant women were classified as obese, and significant odds ratios (OR) were observed for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; 3.32), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM; 3.39), large for gestational age (LGA; 2.91), and macrosomia (4.01). According to the classification of IOM, 474 (7.8%) and 194 (3.1%) were classified as overweight and obese pregnant women, respectively. Specifically, a high OR was observed in obese pregnant women for HDP (5.85) and GDM (5.0). ACOG classification categorized 474 (7.8%) pregnant women as overweight, 141 (2.3%) as obesity class I, 41 (0.6%) as obesity class II, and 12 (0.2%) as obesity class III. In obesity class III, a significantly high OR was observed for HDP (12.89), GDM (8.37), and LGA (5.74). The Japanese classification may be useful for low-risk pregnancies, whereas IOM classification may be applicable to identify high-risk pregnancies. ACOG criteria may be useful for step-wise assessments of HDP and GDM risks in Japanese pregnant women; however, the number of class II and III obese pregnant women was small. Ivyspring International Publisher 2020-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7415393/ /pubmed/32788879 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.47076 Text en © The author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Sugimura, Ryo Kohmura-Kobayashi, Yukiko Narumi, Megumi Furuta-Isomura, Naomi Oda, Tomoaki Tamura, Naoaki Uchida, Toshiyuki Suzuki, Kazunao Sugimura, Motoi Kanayama, Naohiro Itoh, Hiroaki Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center |
title | Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center |
title_full | Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center |
title_short | Comparison of three classification systems of Prepregnancy Body Mass Index with Perinatal Outcomes in Japanese Obese Pregnant Women: A retrospective study at a single center |
title_sort | comparison of three classification systems of prepregnancy body mass index with perinatal outcomes in japanese obese pregnant women: a retrospective study at a single center |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788879 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.47076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sugimuraryo comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT kohmurakobayashiyukiko comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT narumimegumi comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT furutaisomuranaomi comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT odatomoaki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT tamuranaoaki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT uchidatoshiyuki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT suzukikazunao comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT sugimuramotoi comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT kanayamanaohiro comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter AT itohhiroaki comparisonofthreeclassificationsystemsofprepregnancybodymassindexwithperinataloutcomesinjapaneseobesepregnantwomenaretrospectivestudyatasinglecenter |