Cargando…

Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain

BACKGROUND: Identifying the optimal treatment in an acute postoperative setting remains a challenge. Multiple analgesic options are available, but comparing outcomes is limited by a lack of head-to-head trials. In addition, decisions based on efficacy only do not take drug safety into account. In su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schug, Stephan, Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther, Phillips, Lawrence D, Essex, Margaret Noyes, Xia, Feng, Reader, Alison J, Pawinski, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S255921
_version_ 1783569179506376704
author Schug, Stephan
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther
Phillips, Lawrence D
Essex, Margaret Noyes
Xia, Feng
Reader, Alison J
Pawinski, Robert
author_facet Schug, Stephan
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther
Phillips, Lawrence D
Essex, Margaret Noyes
Xia, Feng
Reader, Alison J
Pawinski, Robert
author_sort Schug, Stephan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying the optimal treatment in an acute postoperative setting remains a challenge. Multiple analgesic options are available, but comparing outcomes is limited by a lack of head-to-head trials. In addition, decisions based on efficacy only do not take drug safety into account. In such cases, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) can be utilized to quantify and compare the efficacy and safety data of various drugs. METHODOLOGY: The efficacy-safety profiles of eight parenteral, postoperative analgesics (acetaminophen, diclofenac, ketorolac, metamizole, morphine, nefopam, parecoxib, tramadol) widely used in Europe were evaluated using an MCDA model that included 17 criteria: three for efficacy and 14 for safety. Each drug was scored on each criterion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), according to published data and the judgment of an expert panel. A weighting process was then applied to standardize the impact of each criterion and adjust drugs’ preference scores accordingly, normalizing them on the 0–100 scale. Sensitivity analyses were also performed, including a model in which analgesic profiles were compared when opioid sparing effect was set at a zero value for all drugs. RESULTS: In the primary model, efficacy and safety had relative weightings of 64% and 36%, respectively. Efficacy and safety criteria with the highest values were pain relief (relative weight, 29%) and gastrointestinal effects (12%). Parecoxib received the highest overall score (93), followed by diclofenac (80), and ketorolac (75). Morphine scored the lowest (57), due to the lack of an opioid sparing effect. When opioid sparing was given a zero rating, parecoxib remained the highest scoring analgesic (93), followed by diclofenac (80), metamizole (76), and morphine (76). Parecoxib remained the most preferred analgesic in several other sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This MCDA-based assessment suggests that parecoxib has the most favorable efficacy-safety profile among the assessed postoperative analgesics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7415456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74154562020-08-14 Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain Schug, Stephan Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther Phillips, Lawrence D Essex, Margaret Noyes Xia, Feng Reader, Alison J Pawinski, Robert J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Identifying the optimal treatment in an acute postoperative setting remains a challenge. Multiple analgesic options are available, but comparing outcomes is limited by a lack of head-to-head trials. In addition, decisions based on efficacy only do not take drug safety into account. In such cases, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) can be utilized to quantify and compare the efficacy and safety data of various drugs. METHODOLOGY: The efficacy-safety profiles of eight parenteral, postoperative analgesics (acetaminophen, diclofenac, ketorolac, metamizole, morphine, nefopam, parecoxib, tramadol) widely used in Europe were evaluated using an MCDA model that included 17 criteria: three for efficacy and 14 for safety. Each drug was scored on each criterion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), according to published data and the judgment of an expert panel. A weighting process was then applied to standardize the impact of each criterion and adjust drugs’ preference scores accordingly, normalizing them on the 0–100 scale. Sensitivity analyses were also performed, including a model in which analgesic profiles were compared when opioid sparing effect was set at a zero value for all drugs. RESULTS: In the primary model, efficacy and safety had relative weightings of 64% and 36%, respectively. Efficacy and safety criteria with the highest values were pain relief (relative weight, 29%) and gastrointestinal effects (12%). Parecoxib received the highest overall score (93), followed by diclofenac (80), and ketorolac (75). Morphine scored the lowest (57), due to the lack of an opioid sparing effect. When opioid sparing was given a zero rating, parecoxib remained the highest scoring analgesic (93), followed by diclofenac (80), metamizole (76), and morphine (76). Parecoxib remained the most preferred analgesic in several other sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This MCDA-based assessment suggests that parecoxib has the most favorable efficacy-safety profile among the assessed postoperative analgesics. Dove 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7415456/ /pubmed/32801852 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S255921 Text en © 2020 Schug et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Schug, Stephan
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther
Phillips, Lawrence D
Essex, Margaret Noyes
Xia, Feng
Reader, Alison J
Pawinski, Robert
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain
title Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain
title_full Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain
title_fullStr Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain
title_short Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Develop an Efficacy-Safety Profile of Parenteral Analgesics Used in the Treatment of Postoperative Pain
title_sort multi-criteria decision analysis to develop an efficacy-safety profile of parenteral analgesics used in the treatment of postoperative pain
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801852
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S255921
work_keys_str_mv AT schugstephan multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain
AT pogatzkizahnesther multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain
AT phillipslawrenced multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain
AT essexmargaretnoyes multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain
AT xiafeng multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain
AT readeralisonj multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain
AT pawinskirobert multicriteriadecisionanalysistodevelopanefficacysafetyprofileofparenteralanalgesicsusedinthetreatmentofpostoperativepain