Cargando…

Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?

PURPOSE: To describe a case of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis in a patient with a cystic, avascular filtering bleb who had been implanted with a Xen® Gel Stent 21 months previously. OBSERVATIONS: A 64-year-old woman with open-angle glaucoma developed severe endophthalmitis 21 months...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buffault, Juliette, Baudouin, Christophe, Labbé, Antoine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100850
_version_ 1783569209846923264
author Buffault, Juliette
Baudouin, Christophe
Labbé, Antoine
author_facet Buffault, Juliette
Baudouin, Christophe
Labbé, Antoine
author_sort Buffault, Juliette
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe a case of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis in a patient with a cystic, avascular filtering bleb who had been implanted with a Xen® Gel Stent 21 months previously. OBSERVATIONS: A 64-year-old woman with open-angle glaucoma developed severe endophthalmitis 21 months after Xen® Gel Stent implantation. On presentation, visual acuity was limited to light perception. Examination revealed a 100% hypopyon, blebitis and an exposed stent, along with orbital cellulitis. Immediate explantation of the exposed Xen® was performed, and intravitreal antibiotics were administered. S. pneumoniae was isolated from an anterior chamber paracentesis. Based on the antibiogram, the patient was treated with topical fortified piperacillin, gentamicin and vancomycin along with appropriate systemic antibiotics (intravenous imipenem and oral levofloxacin). After 3 days of antibiotics, she received a daily intravenous bolus of methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day for three days. Despite these measures, the patient's condition declined, with purulent melting of the globe requiring evisceration. CONCLUSIONSAND IMPORTANCE: As for other filtering surgeries, blebitis and severe endophthalmitis can occur after Xen® Gel Stent implantation. Patients with thin conjunctiva and/or cystic blebs over the stent should be followed particularly closely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7415825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74158252020-08-12 Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive? Buffault, Juliette Baudouin, Christophe Labbé, Antoine Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Case Report PURPOSE: To describe a case of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis in a patient with a cystic, avascular filtering bleb who had been implanted with a Xen® Gel Stent 21 months previously. OBSERVATIONS: A 64-year-old woman with open-angle glaucoma developed severe endophthalmitis 21 months after Xen® Gel Stent implantation. On presentation, visual acuity was limited to light perception. Examination revealed a 100% hypopyon, blebitis and an exposed stent, along with orbital cellulitis. Immediate explantation of the exposed Xen® was performed, and intravitreal antibiotics were administered. S. pneumoniae was isolated from an anterior chamber paracentesis. Based on the antibiogram, the patient was treated with topical fortified piperacillin, gentamicin and vancomycin along with appropriate systemic antibiotics (intravenous imipenem and oral levofloxacin). After 3 days of antibiotics, she received a daily intravenous bolus of methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day for three days. Despite these measures, the patient's condition declined, with purulent melting of the globe requiring evisceration. CONCLUSIONSAND IMPORTANCE: As for other filtering surgeries, blebitis and severe endophthalmitis can occur after Xen® Gel Stent implantation. Patients with thin conjunctiva and/or cystic blebs over the stent should be followed particularly closely. Elsevier 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7415825/ /pubmed/32793844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100850 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Buffault, Juliette
Baudouin, Christophe
Labbé, Antoine
Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?
title Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?
title_full Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?
title_fullStr Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?
title_full_unstemmed Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?
title_short Is the Xen® Gel Stent really minimally invasive?
title_sort is the xen® gel stent really minimally invasive?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7415825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100850
work_keys_str_mv AT buffaultjuliette isthexengelstentreallyminimallyinvasive
AT baudouinchristophe isthexengelstentreallyminimallyinvasive
AT labbeantoine isthexengelstentreallyminimallyinvasive