Cargando…

Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test

BACKGROUND: Failure of milk introduction after a negative food challenge test is reported in a substantial number of patients. For this reason, guidelines recommend that the total dose of milk protein for a food challenge test should be comparable to a normal serving. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Ven, Celine A., Herpertz, Irene, van Lente, Lidy, van der Meulen, Gerbrich N., Kamps, Arvid W. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.305
_version_ 1783569243605827584
author van de Ven, Celine A.
Herpertz, Irene
van Lente, Lidy
van der Meulen, Gerbrich N.
Kamps, Arvid W. A.
author_facet van de Ven, Celine A.
Herpertz, Irene
van Lente, Lidy
van der Meulen, Gerbrich N.
Kamps, Arvid W. A.
author_sort van de Ven, Celine A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Failure of milk introduction after a negative food challenge test is reported in a substantial number of patients. For this reason, guidelines recommend that the total dose of milk protein for a food challenge test should be comparable to a normal serving. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to compare the success rate of milk introduction after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled challenge test performed with different doses of milk protein and different milk products. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 485 patients challenged with a low or high dose of milk protein. Pasteurized milk and milk protein powder were used for the low‐dose challenge tests, and condensed milk for the high‐dose challenge tests. Successful introduction was defined as regular milk consumption, and discontinuation of further introduction due to the reappearance of symptoms as unsuccessful introduction. We also evaluated the association between milk products and successful introduction. RESULTS: The outcome of 288 (59.4%) double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge tests was negative. There were no significant differences between the low and high dose of milk protein in patient characteristics, percentage of patients lost to follow‐up (15% vs 20%), in whom introduction had not yet been performed (4% vs 3.1%), reappearance of symptoms (18% vs 17%), and successful introduction (88.0% and 83.4%). Age, gender, specific immunoglobulin E for milk, dose of milk protein, and atopy were not associated with successful introduction. Children who experienced symptoms during the introduction were less likely to consume milk (P < .001). There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher successful introduction rate if pasteurized milk was used as test material compared to milk protein powder, and condensed milk. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Successful introduction of milk after a negative challenge test is independent of the total dose of milk protein, and milk product used during the challenge test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7416018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74160182020-08-10 Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test van de Ven, Celine A. Herpertz, Irene van Lente, Lidy van der Meulen, Gerbrich N. Kamps, Arvid W. A. Immun Inflamm Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Failure of milk introduction after a negative food challenge test is reported in a substantial number of patients. For this reason, guidelines recommend that the total dose of milk protein for a food challenge test should be comparable to a normal serving. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to compare the success rate of milk introduction after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled challenge test performed with different doses of milk protein and different milk products. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 485 patients challenged with a low or high dose of milk protein. Pasteurized milk and milk protein powder were used for the low‐dose challenge tests, and condensed milk for the high‐dose challenge tests. Successful introduction was defined as regular milk consumption, and discontinuation of further introduction due to the reappearance of symptoms as unsuccessful introduction. We also evaluated the association between milk products and successful introduction. RESULTS: The outcome of 288 (59.4%) double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge tests was negative. There were no significant differences between the low and high dose of milk protein in patient characteristics, percentage of patients lost to follow‐up (15% vs 20%), in whom introduction had not yet been performed (4% vs 3.1%), reappearance of symptoms (18% vs 17%), and successful introduction (88.0% and 83.4%). Age, gender, specific immunoglobulin E for milk, dose of milk protein, and atopy were not associated with successful introduction. Children who experienced symptoms during the introduction were less likely to consume milk (P < .001). There was a nonsignificant trend toward higher successful introduction rate if pasteurized milk was used as test material compared to milk protein powder, and condensed milk. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Successful introduction of milk after a negative challenge test is independent of the total dose of milk protein, and milk product used during the challenge test. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7416018/ /pubmed/32319204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.305 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
van de Ven, Celine A.
Herpertz, Irene
van Lente, Lidy
van der Meulen, Gerbrich N.
Kamps, Arvid W. A.
Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
title Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
title_full Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
title_fullStr Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
title_full_unstemmed Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
title_short Successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
title_sort successful introduction of milk after a negative double‐blind placebo‐controlled food challenge test is independent of the total dose and milk product used during the challenge test
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/iid3.305
work_keys_str_mv AT vandevencelinea successfulintroductionofmilkafteranegativedoubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengetestisindependentofthetotaldoseandmilkproductusedduringthechallengetest
AT herpertzirene successfulintroductionofmilkafteranegativedoubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengetestisindependentofthetotaldoseandmilkproductusedduringthechallengetest
AT vanlentelidy successfulintroductionofmilkafteranegativedoubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengetestisindependentofthetotaldoseandmilkproductusedduringthechallengetest
AT vandermeulengerbrichn successfulintroductionofmilkafteranegativedoubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengetestisindependentofthetotaldoseandmilkproductusedduringthechallengetest
AT kampsarvidwa successfulintroductionofmilkafteranegativedoubleblindplacebocontrolledfoodchallengetestisindependentofthetotaldoseandmilkproductusedduringthechallengetest