Cargando…

A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling

Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (3D STE) is an emerging noninvasive method for predicting left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Previous studies analyzed the predictive value of 3D STE with traditional models. However, no models that contain c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhong, Junda, Liu, Peng, Li, Shuang, Huang, Xiaomin, Zhang, Qunhui, Huang, Jianyu, Guo, Yan, Chen, Meixiang, Ruan, Zheng, Qin, Changyu, Xu, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8847144
_version_ 1783569292947619840
author Zhong, Junda
Liu, Peng
Li, Shuang
Huang, Xiaomin
Zhang, Qunhui
Huang, Jianyu
Guo, Yan
Chen, Meixiang
Ruan, Zheng
Qin, Changyu
Xu, Lin
author_facet Zhong, Junda
Liu, Peng
Li, Shuang
Huang, Xiaomin
Zhang, Qunhui
Huang, Jianyu
Guo, Yan
Chen, Meixiang
Ruan, Zheng
Qin, Changyu
Xu, Lin
author_sort Zhong, Junda
collection PubMed
description Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (3D STE) is an emerging noninvasive method for predicting left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Previous studies analyzed the predictive value of 3D STE with traditional models. However, no models that contain comprehensive risk factors were assessed, and there are limited data on the comparison of different 3D STE parameters. In this study, we sought to build a machine learning model for predicting LVR in AMI patients after effective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that contains the majority of the clinical risk factors and compare 3D STE parameters values for LVR prediction. We enrolled 135 first-onset AMI patients (120 males, mean age 54 ± 9 years). All patients went through a 3D STE and a traditional transthoracic echocardiography 24 hours after reperfusion. A second echocardiography was repeated at the three-month follow-up to detect LVR (defined as a 20 percent increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume). Six models were constructed using 15 risk factors. A receiver operator characteristic curve and four performance measurements were used as evaluation methods. Feature importance was used to compare 3D STE parameters. 26 patients (19.3%) had LVR. Our evaluation showed that RF can best predict LVR with the best AUC of 0.96. 3D GLS was the most valuable 3D STE parameters, followed by GCS, global area strain, and global radial strain (feature importance 0.146, 0.089, 0.087, and 0.069, respectively). To sum up, RF models can accurately predict the LVR after AMI, and 3D GLS was the best 3D STE parameters in predicting the LVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7416266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74162662020-08-14 A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling Zhong, Junda Liu, Peng Li, Shuang Huang, Xiaomin Zhang, Qunhui Huang, Jianyu Guo, Yan Chen, Meixiang Ruan, Zheng Qin, Changyu Xu, Lin J Healthc Eng Research Article Three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (3D STE) is an emerging noninvasive method for predicting left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Previous studies analyzed the predictive value of 3D STE with traditional models. However, no models that contain comprehensive risk factors were assessed, and there are limited data on the comparison of different 3D STE parameters. In this study, we sought to build a machine learning model for predicting LVR in AMI patients after effective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that contains the majority of the clinical risk factors and compare 3D STE parameters values for LVR prediction. We enrolled 135 first-onset AMI patients (120 males, mean age 54 ± 9 years). All patients went through a 3D STE and a traditional transthoracic echocardiography 24 hours after reperfusion. A second echocardiography was repeated at the three-month follow-up to detect LVR (defined as a 20 percent increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume). Six models were constructed using 15 risk factors. A receiver operator characteristic curve and four performance measurements were used as evaluation methods. Feature importance was used to compare 3D STE parameters. 26 patients (19.3%) had LVR. Our evaluation showed that RF can best predict LVR with the best AUC of 0.96. 3D GLS was the most valuable 3D STE parameters, followed by GCS, global area strain, and global radial strain (feature importance 0.146, 0.089, 0.087, and 0.069, respectively). To sum up, RF models can accurately predict the LVR after AMI, and 3D GLS was the best 3D STE parameters in predicting the LVR. Hindawi 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7416266/ /pubmed/32802300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8847144 Text en Copyright © 2020 Junda Zhong et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhong, Junda
Liu, Peng
Li, Shuang
Huang, Xiaomin
Zhang, Qunhui
Huang, Jianyu
Guo, Yan
Chen, Meixiang
Ruan, Zheng
Qin, Changyu
Xu, Lin
A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling
title A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling
title_full A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling
title_fullStr A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling
title_short A Comparison of Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography Parameters in Predicting Left Ventricular Remodeling
title_sort comparison of three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography parameters in predicting left ventricular remodeling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416266/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8847144
work_keys_str_mv AT zhongjunda acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT liupeng acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT lishuang acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT huangxiaomin acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT zhangqunhui acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT huangjianyu acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT guoyan acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT chenmeixiang acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT ruanzheng acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT qinchangyu acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT xulin acomparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT zhongjunda comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT liupeng comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT lishuang comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT huangxiaomin comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT zhangqunhui comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT huangjianyu comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT guoyan comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT chenmeixiang comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT ruanzheng comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT qinchangyu comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling
AT xulin comparisonofthreedimensionalspeckletrackingechocardiographyparametersinpredictingleftventricularremodeling