Cargando…
Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal?
Background: Bladder adenocarcinoma (AC) is a scarce histological variant and there are few studies on its proper management. No previous case reports present the management of a urachal tumor and the incidental finding of bladder adenocarcinoma. Clinical case: We present the case of a young woman wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832071 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20106.1 |
_version_ | 1783569328156704768 |
---|---|
author | Tejeda-Mariaca, J. Eduardo Ordoñez-Alcantara, Marco Bello-Sedano, Aldo Perez-Cornejo, Victor Grandez-Urbina, J. Antonio |
author_facet | Tejeda-Mariaca, J. Eduardo Ordoñez-Alcantara, Marco Bello-Sedano, Aldo Perez-Cornejo, Victor Grandez-Urbina, J. Antonio |
author_sort | Tejeda-Mariaca, J. Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Bladder adenocarcinoma (AC) is a scarce histological variant and there are few studies on its proper management. No previous case reports present the management of a urachal tumor and the incidental finding of bladder adenocarcinoma. Clinical case: We present the case of a young woman with nonspecific symptoms, who presented with a prior history of dysuria, bladder tenesmus, suprapubic pain and urinary urgency for one year, which had been treated as recurrent urinary tract infection. A partial cystectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy was scheduled. We found a bladder tumor with characteristics of a urachal tumor and the pathological report indicated a primary bladder AC. The patient had a complete recovery at one year of follow-up. Conclusions: A patient can present with a tumor with urachal characteristics; however, the pathology report can show primary AC. The decision to perform partial cystectomy was an appropriate option for the location of this tumor, with optimal surgical results. Still, a long-term follow-up is necessary. More specific management guidelines are required for the treatment of AC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7416577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74165772020-08-20 Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? Tejeda-Mariaca, J. Eduardo Ordoñez-Alcantara, Marco Bello-Sedano, Aldo Perez-Cornejo, Victor Grandez-Urbina, J. Antonio F1000Res Case Report Background: Bladder adenocarcinoma (AC) is a scarce histological variant and there are few studies on its proper management. No previous case reports present the management of a urachal tumor and the incidental finding of bladder adenocarcinoma. Clinical case: We present the case of a young woman with nonspecific symptoms, who presented with a prior history of dysuria, bladder tenesmus, suprapubic pain and urinary urgency for one year, which had been treated as recurrent urinary tract infection. A partial cystectomy plus extended lymphadenectomy was scheduled. We found a bladder tumor with characteristics of a urachal tumor and the pathological report indicated a primary bladder AC. The patient had a complete recovery at one year of follow-up. Conclusions: A patient can present with a tumor with urachal characteristics; however, the pathology report can show primary AC. The decision to perform partial cystectomy was an appropriate option for the location of this tumor, with optimal surgical results. Still, a long-term follow-up is necessary. More specific management guidelines are required for the treatment of AC. F1000 Research Limited 2019-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7416577/ /pubmed/32832071 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20106.1 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Tejeda-Mariaca JE et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Tejeda-Mariaca, J. Eduardo Ordoñez-Alcantara, Marco Bello-Sedano, Aldo Perez-Cornejo, Victor Grandez-Urbina, J. Antonio Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
title | Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
title_full | Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
title_fullStr | Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
title_full_unstemmed | Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
title_short | Case Report: Bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
title_sort | case report: bladder adenocarcinoma: primary or urachal? |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832071 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20106.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tejedamariacajeduardo casereportbladderadenocarcinomaprimaryorurachal AT ordonezalcantaramarco casereportbladderadenocarcinomaprimaryorurachal AT bellosedanoaldo casereportbladderadenocarcinomaprimaryorurachal AT perezcornejovictor casereportbladderadenocarcinomaprimaryorurachal AT grandezurbinajantonio casereportbladderadenocarcinomaprimaryorurachal |