Cargando…

Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)

The present opinion deals with the re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201, PVP) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202, PVPP) when used as food additives. One request for extension of use of PVP (E 1201) in foods for special medical purposes was also considered in this assessment. The Panel fol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Younes, Maged, Aquilina, Gabriele, Castle, Laurence, Engel, Karl‐Heinz, Fowler, Paul, Fürst, Peter, Gürtler, Rainer, Gundert‐Remy, Ursula, Husøy, Trine, Manco, Melania, Mennes, Wim, Moldeus, Peter, Passamonti, Sabina, Shah, Romina, Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika, Wölfle, Detlef, Wright, Matthew, Boon, Polly, Crebelli, Riccardo, Di Domenico, Alessandro, Filipič, Metka, Mortensen, Alicja, Woutersen, Ruud, Van Loveren, Henk, Giarola, Alessandra, Lodi, Federica, Rincon, Ana Maria, Tard, Alexandra, Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788942
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6215
_version_ 1783569356558434304
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Filipič, Metka
Mortensen, Alicja
Woutersen, Ruud
Van Loveren, Henk
Giarola, Alessandra
Lodi, Federica
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Filipič, Metka
Mortensen, Alicja
Woutersen, Ruud
Van Loveren, Henk
Giarola, Alessandra
Lodi, Federica
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
collection PubMed
description The present opinion deals with the re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201, PVP) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202, PVPP) when used as food additives. One request for extension of use of PVP (E 1201) in foods for special medical purposes was also considered in this assessment. The Panel followed the conceptual framework under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 and considered that: the exposure assessment was based on the reported use and use levels (one food category out of the two food categories in which PVP and PVPP are authorised); the 95th percentile of exposure to PVP and PVPP of maximally 23.7 and 25 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day in children, respectively, was overestimated, because it was assumed that 100% of the food supplements consumed contained PVP or PVPP at the maximum reported use levels; the extension of use of PVP (E 1201) to foods for special medical purposes (FC 13.2) would result in an exposure of PVP of 4.3 mg/kg bw per day for children; the absorption of PVP and PVPP is very low; sufficient toxicity data were available for PVP; there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity of PVP and PVPP; no carcinogenic effects were reported in carcinogenicity studies in rats at a dose of 2,500 mg PVP/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested; there is no need for chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity data for PVPP for the safety assessment of PVPP given the chemical similarity between PVP and PVPP, and the lack of adverse effects in the available repeated dose toxicity studies. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for numerical acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for PVP and PVPP, and that there is no safety concern for the reported uses and use levels of PVP and PVPP as food additives. The Panel further concluded that the proposed extension of use is not expected to be of safety concern at the proposed maximum permitted level (MPL) and recommended consumption level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7416752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74167522020-08-11 Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Moldeus, Peter Passamonti, Sabina Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Boon, Polly Crebelli, Riccardo Di Domenico, Alessandro Filipič, Metka Mortensen, Alicja Woutersen, Ruud Van Loveren, Henk Giarola, Alessandra Lodi, Federica Rincon, Ana Maria Tard, Alexandra Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose EFSA J Scientific Opinion The present opinion deals with the re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201, PVP) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202, PVPP) when used as food additives. One request for extension of use of PVP (E 1201) in foods for special medical purposes was also considered in this assessment. The Panel followed the conceptual framework under Commission Regulation (EU) No 257/2010 and considered that: the exposure assessment was based on the reported use and use levels (one food category out of the two food categories in which PVP and PVPP are authorised); the 95th percentile of exposure to PVP and PVPP of maximally 23.7 and 25 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day in children, respectively, was overestimated, because it was assumed that 100% of the food supplements consumed contained PVP or PVPP at the maximum reported use levels; the extension of use of PVP (E 1201) to foods for special medical purposes (FC 13.2) would result in an exposure of PVP of 4.3 mg/kg bw per day for children; the absorption of PVP and PVPP is very low; sufficient toxicity data were available for PVP; there is no concern with respect to the genotoxicity of PVP and PVPP; no carcinogenic effects were reported in carcinogenicity studies in rats at a dose of 2,500 mg PVP/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested; there is no need for chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity data for PVPP for the safety assessment of PVPP given the chemical similarity between PVP and PVPP, and the lack of adverse effects in the available repeated dose toxicity studies. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for numerical acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) for PVP and PVPP, and that there is no safety concern for the reported uses and use levels of PVP and PVPP as food additives. The Panel further concluded that the proposed extension of use is not expected to be of safety concern at the proposed maximum permitted level (MPL) and recommended consumption level. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7416752/ /pubmed/32788942 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6215 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Moldeus, Peter
Passamonti, Sabina
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Dina Hendrika
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Boon, Polly
Crebelli, Riccardo
Di Domenico, Alessandro
Filipič, Metka
Mortensen, Alicja
Woutersen, Ruud
Van Loveren, Henk
Giarola, Alessandra
Lodi, Federica
Rincon, Ana Maria
Tard, Alexandra
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
title Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
title_full Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
title_short Re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (E 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (E 1201)
title_sort re‐evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone (e 1201) and polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (e 1202) as food additives and extension of use of polyvinylpyrrolidone (e 1201)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788942
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6215
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT younesmaged reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT castlelaurence reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT fowlerpaul reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT furstpeter reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT husøytrine reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT mancomelania reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT menneswim reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT passamontisabina reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT shahromina reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT waalkensberendsendinahendrika reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT boonpolly reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT didomenicoalessandro reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT filipicmetka reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT woutersenruud reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT vanloverenhenk reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT giarolaalessandra reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT lodifederica reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT rinconanamaria reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201
AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201andpolyvinylpolypyrrolidonee1202asfoodadditivesandextensionofuseofpolyvinylpyrrolidonee1201