Cargando…
Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure
OBJECTIVES: Although the reliability of e-point septal separation (EPSS) and caval index (CI) is proven in the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF), how much they contribute to the initial clinical impression is unclear. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.290065 |
_version_ | 1783569372607938560 |
---|---|
author | Duyan, Murat Ünal, Aslıhan Yürüktümen Özturan, İbrahim Ulaş Günsoy, Ertuğ |
author_facet | Duyan, Murat Ünal, Aslıhan Yürüktümen Özturan, İbrahim Ulaş Günsoy, Ertuğ |
author_sort | Duyan, Murat |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Although the reliability of e-point septal separation (EPSS) and caval index (CI) is proven in the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF), how much they contribute to the initial clinical impression is unclear. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the initial clinical impression of AHF. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducted in an academic emergency department (ED). The patients admitted to the ED with acute undifferentiated dyspnea were included. Primary diagnosis was made after an initial clinical evaluation, and a secondary diagnosis was made after EPSS and CI measurements. Independent cardiologists made the final diagnosis. The primary outcome was the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the primary diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included in the study. The primary diagnosis was found with a sensitivity of 0.55 and specificity of 0.84 and the secondary diagnosis was determined with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.83 in predicting the final diagnosis. The agreement coefficient between the primary and final diagnosis was 0.44 and between the secondary diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 0.61. When the primary diagnosis was coherent with secondary diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.74 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although a detailed history and physical examination are the essential factors in shaping clinical perception, CI and EPSS combined significantly contribute to the initial clinical impression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7416849 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74168492020-08-20 Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure Duyan, Murat Ünal, Aslıhan Yürüktümen Özturan, İbrahim Ulaş Günsoy, Ertuğ Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Although the reliability of e-point septal separation (EPSS) and caval index (CI) is proven in the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF), how much they contribute to the initial clinical impression is unclear. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the initial clinical impression of AHF. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study conducted in an academic emergency department (ED). The patients admitted to the ED with acute undifferentiated dyspnea were included. Primary diagnosis was made after an initial clinical evaluation, and a secondary diagnosis was made after EPSS and CI measurements. Independent cardiologists made the final diagnosis. The primary outcome was the diagnostic contribution of EPSS and CI to the primary diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included in the study. The primary diagnosis was found with a sensitivity of 0.55 and specificity of 0.84 and the secondary diagnosis was determined with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.83 in predicting the final diagnosis. The agreement coefficient between the primary and final diagnosis was 0.44 and between the secondary diagnosis and the final diagnosis was 0.61. When the primary diagnosis was coherent with secondary diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were found to be 0.74 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although a detailed history and physical examination are the essential factors in shaping clinical perception, CI and EPSS combined significantly contribute to the initial clinical impression. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7416849/ /pubmed/32832729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.290065 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Duyan, Murat Ünal, Aslıhan Yürüktümen Özturan, İbrahim Ulaş Günsoy, Ertuğ Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
title | Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
title_full | Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
title_fullStr | Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
title_short | Contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
title_sort | contribution of caval index and ejection fraction estimated by e-point septal separation measured by emergency physicians in the clinical diagnosis of acute heart failure |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7416849/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32832729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.290065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duyanmurat contributionofcavalindexandejectionfractionestimatedbyepointseptalseparationmeasuredbyemergencyphysiciansintheclinicaldiagnosisofacuteheartfailure AT unalaslıhanyuruktumen contributionofcavalindexandejectionfractionestimatedbyepointseptalseparationmeasuredbyemergencyphysiciansintheclinicaldiagnosisofacuteheartfailure AT ozturanibrahimulas contributionofcavalindexandejectionfractionestimatedbyepointseptalseparationmeasuredbyemergencyphysiciansintheclinicaldiagnosisofacuteheartfailure AT gunsoyertug contributionofcavalindexandejectionfractionestimatedbyepointseptalseparationmeasuredbyemergencyphysiciansintheclinicaldiagnosisofacuteheartfailure |