Cargando…

Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows

The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is classified as highly endangered in several countries of Central Europe. Populations of M. fossilis are predominantly found in ditches with low water levels and thick sludge layers and are thus hard to detect using conventional fishing methods. There...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusanke, Lena Maureen, Panteleit, Jörn, Stoll, Stefan, Korte, Egbert, Sünger, Eike, Schulz, Ralf, Theissinger, Kathrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6540
_version_ 1783569444351508480
author Kusanke, Lena Maureen
Panteleit, Jörn
Stoll, Stefan
Korte, Egbert
Sünger, Eike
Schulz, Ralf
Theissinger, Kathrin
author_facet Kusanke, Lena Maureen
Panteleit, Jörn
Stoll, Stefan
Korte, Egbert
Sünger, Eike
Schulz, Ralf
Theissinger, Kathrin
author_sort Kusanke, Lena Maureen
collection PubMed
description The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is classified as highly endangered in several countries of Central Europe. Populations of M. fossilis are predominantly found in ditches with low water levels and thick sludge layers and are thus hard to detect using conventional fishing methods. Therefore, environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring appears particularly relevant for this species. In previous studies, M. fossilis was surveyed following eDNA water sampling protocols, which were not optimized for this species. Therefore, we created two full factorial study designs to test six different eDNA workflows for sediment samples and twelve different workflows for water samples. We used qPCR to compare the threshold cycle (C (t)) values of the different workflows, which indicate the target DNA amount in the sample, and spectrophotometry to quantify and compare the total DNA amount inside the samples. We analyzed 96 water samples and 48 sediment samples from a pond with a known population of M. fossilis. We tested several method combinations for long‐term sample preservation, DNA capture, and DNA extraction. Additionally, we analyzed the DNA yield of samples from a ditch with a natural M. fossilis population monthly over one year to determine the optimal sampling period. Our results showed that the long‐term water preservation method commonly used for eDNA surveys of M. fossilis did not lead to optimal DNA yields, and we present a valid long‐term sample preservation alternative. A cost‐efficient high salt DNA extraction led to the highest target DNA yields and can be used for sediment and water samples. Furthermore, we were able to show that in a natural habitat of M. fossilis, total and target eDNA were higher between June and September, which implies that this period is favorable for eDNA sampling. Our results will help to improve the reliability of future eDNA surveys of M. fossilis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7417210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74172102020-08-11 Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows Kusanke, Lena Maureen Panteleit, Jörn Stoll, Stefan Korte, Egbert Sünger, Eike Schulz, Ralf Theissinger, Kathrin Ecol Evol Original Research The European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) is classified as highly endangered in several countries of Central Europe. Populations of M. fossilis are predominantly found in ditches with low water levels and thick sludge layers and are thus hard to detect using conventional fishing methods. Therefore, environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring appears particularly relevant for this species. In previous studies, M. fossilis was surveyed following eDNA water sampling protocols, which were not optimized for this species. Therefore, we created two full factorial study designs to test six different eDNA workflows for sediment samples and twelve different workflows for water samples. We used qPCR to compare the threshold cycle (C (t)) values of the different workflows, which indicate the target DNA amount in the sample, and spectrophotometry to quantify and compare the total DNA amount inside the samples. We analyzed 96 water samples and 48 sediment samples from a pond with a known population of M. fossilis. We tested several method combinations for long‐term sample preservation, DNA capture, and DNA extraction. Additionally, we analyzed the DNA yield of samples from a ditch with a natural M. fossilis population monthly over one year to determine the optimal sampling period. Our results showed that the long‐term water preservation method commonly used for eDNA surveys of M. fossilis did not lead to optimal DNA yields, and we present a valid long‐term sample preservation alternative. A cost‐efficient high salt DNA extraction led to the highest target DNA yields and can be used for sediment and water samples. Furthermore, we were able to show that in a natural habitat of M. fossilis, total and target eDNA were higher between June and September, which implies that this period is favorable for eDNA sampling. Our results will help to improve the reliability of future eDNA surveys of M. fossilis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7417210/ /pubmed/32788983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6540 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kusanke, Lena Maureen
Panteleit, Jörn
Stoll, Stefan
Korte, Egbert
Sünger, Eike
Schulz, Ralf
Theissinger, Kathrin
Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows
title Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows
title_full Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows
title_fullStr Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows
title_full_unstemmed Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows
title_short Detection of the endangered European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA workflows
title_sort detection of the endangered european weather loach (misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: testing multiple edna workflows
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6540
work_keys_str_mv AT kusankelenamaureen detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows
AT panteleitjorn detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows
AT stollstefan detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows
AT korteegbert detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows
AT sungereike detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows
AT schulzralf detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows
AT theissingerkathrin detectionoftheendangeredeuropeanweatherloachmisgurnusfossilisviawaterandsedimentsamplestestingmultipleednaworkflows