Cargando…

Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases

Population monitoring is a critical part of effective wildlife management, but methods are prone to biases that can hinder our ability to accurately track changes in populations through time. Calf survival plays an important role in ungulate population dynamics and can be monitored using telemetry a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellington, E. Hance, Lewis, Keith P., Koen, Erin L., Vander Wal, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6553
_version_ 1783569447628308480
author Ellington, E. Hance
Lewis, Keith P.
Koen, Erin L.
Vander Wal, Eric
author_facet Ellington, E. Hance
Lewis, Keith P.
Koen, Erin L.
Vander Wal, Eric
author_sort Ellington, E. Hance
collection PubMed
description Population monitoring is a critical part of effective wildlife management, but methods are prone to biases that can hinder our ability to accurately track changes in populations through time. Calf survival plays an important role in ungulate population dynamics and can be monitored using telemetry and herd composition surveys. These methods, however, are susceptible to unrepresentative sampling and violations of the assumption of equal detectability, respectively. Here, we capitalized on 55 herd‐wide estimates of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) calf survival in Newfoundland, Canada, using telemetry (n = 1,175 calves) and 249 herd‐wide estimates of calf:cow ratios (C:C) using herd composition surveys to investigate these potential biases. These data included 17 herd‐wide estimates replicated from both methods concurrently (n = 448 calves and n = 17 surveys) which we used to understand which processes and sampling biases contributed to disagreement between estimates of herd‐wide calf survival. We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine whether estimates of calf mortality risk were biased by the date a calf was collared. We also used linear mixed‐effects models to determine whether estimates of C:C ratios were biased by survey date and herd size. We found that calves collared later in the calving season had a higher mortality risk and that C:C tended to be higher for surveys conducted later in the autumn. When we used these relationships to modify estimates of herd‐wide calf survival derived from telemetry and herd composition surveys concurrently, we found that formerly disparate estimates of woodland caribou calf survival now overlapped (within a 95% confidence interval) in a majority of cases. Our case study highlights the potential of under‐appreciated biases to impact our understanding of population dynamics and suggests ways that managers can limit the influence of these biases in the two widely applied methods for estimating herd‐wide survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7417224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74172242020-08-11 Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases Ellington, E. Hance Lewis, Keith P. Koen, Erin L. Vander Wal, Eric Ecol Evol Original Research Population monitoring is a critical part of effective wildlife management, but methods are prone to biases that can hinder our ability to accurately track changes in populations through time. Calf survival plays an important role in ungulate population dynamics and can be monitored using telemetry and herd composition surveys. These methods, however, are susceptible to unrepresentative sampling and violations of the assumption of equal detectability, respectively. Here, we capitalized on 55 herd‐wide estimates of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) calf survival in Newfoundland, Canada, using telemetry (n = 1,175 calves) and 249 herd‐wide estimates of calf:cow ratios (C:C) using herd composition surveys to investigate these potential biases. These data included 17 herd‐wide estimates replicated from both methods concurrently (n = 448 calves and n = 17 surveys) which we used to understand which processes and sampling biases contributed to disagreement between estimates of herd‐wide calf survival. We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine whether estimates of calf mortality risk were biased by the date a calf was collared. We also used linear mixed‐effects models to determine whether estimates of C:C ratios were biased by survey date and herd size. We found that calves collared later in the calving season had a higher mortality risk and that C:C tended to be higher for surveys conducted later in the autumn. When we used these relationships to modify estimates of herd‐wide calf survival derived from telemetry and herd composition surveys concurrently, we found that formerly disparate estimates of woodland caribou calf survival now overlapped (within a 95% confidence interval) in a majority of cases. Our case study highlights the potential of under‐appreciated biases to impact our understanding of population dynamics and suggests ways that managers can limit the influence of these biases in the two widely applied methods for estimating herd‐wide survival. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7417224/ /pubmed/32788995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6553 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ellington, E. Hance
Lewis, Keith P.
Koen, Erin L.
Vander Wal, Eric
Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases
title Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases
title_full Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases
title_fullStr Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases
title_full_unstemmed Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases
title_short Divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: Ecological factors and methodological biases
title_sort divergent estimates of herd‐wide caribou calf survival: ecological factors and methodological biases
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6553
work_keys_str_mv AT ellingtonehance divergentestimatesofherdwidecariboucalfsurvivalecologicalfactorsandmethodologicalbiases
AT lewiskeithp divergentestimatesofherdwidecariboucalfsurvivalecologicalfactorsandmethodologicalbiases
AT koenerinl divergentestimatesofherdwidecariboucalfsurvivalecologicalfactorsandmethodologicalbiases
AT vanderwaleric divergentestimatesofherdwidecariboucalfsurvivalecologicalfactorsandmethodologicalbiases