Cargando…
New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys
1. Reliable estimates of abundance are critical in effectively managing threatened species, but the feasibility of integrating data from wildlife surveys completed using advanced technologies such as remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) and machine learning into abundance estimation methods such...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6522 |
_version_ | 1783569449977118720 |
---|---|
author | Corcoran, Evangeline Denman, Simon Hamilton, Grant |
author_facet | Corcoran, Evangeline Denman, Simon Hamilton, Grant |
author_sort | Corcoran, Evangeline |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. Reliable estimates of abundance are critical in effectively managing threatened species, but the feasibility of integrating data from wildlife surveys completed using advanced technologies such as remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) and machine learning into abundance estimation methods such as N‐mixture modeling is largely unknown due to the unique sources of detection errors associated with these technologies. 2. We evaluated two modeling approaches for estimating the abundance of koalas detected automatically in RPAS imagery: (a) a generalized N‐mixture model and (b) a modified Horvitz–Thompson (H‐T) estimator method combining generalized linear models and generalized additive models for overall probability of detection, false detection, and duplicate detection. The final estimates from each model were compared to the true number of koalas present as determined by telemetry‐assisted ground surveys. 3. The modified H‐T estimator approach performed best, with the true count of koalas captured within the 95% confidence intervals around the abundance estimates in all 4 surveys in the testing dataset (n = 138 detected objects), a particularly strong result given the difficulty in attaining accuracy found with previous methods. 4. The results suggested that N‐mixture models in their current form may not be the most appropriate approach to estimating the abundance of wildlife detected in RPAS surveys with automated detection, and accurate estimates could be made with approaches that account for spurious detections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7417234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74172342020-08-11 New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys Corcoran, Evangeline Denman, Simon Hamilton, Grant Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Reliable estimates of abundance are critical in effectively managing threatened species, but the feasibility of integrating data from wildlife surveys completed using advanced technologies such as remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) and machine learning into abundance estimation methods such as N‐mixture modeling is largely unknown due to the unique sources of detection errors associated with these technologies. 2. We evaluated two modeling approaches for estimating the abundance of koalas detected automatically in RPAS imagery: (a) a generalized N‐mixture model and (b) a modified Horvitz–Thompson (H‐T) estimator method combining generalized linear models and generalized additive models for overall probability of detection, false detection, and duplicate detection. The final estimates from each model were compared to the true number of koalas present as determined by telemetry‐assisted ground surveys. 3. The modified H‐T estimator approach performed best, with the true count of koalas captured within the 95% confidence intervals around the abundance estimates in all 4 surveys in the testing dataset (n = 138 detected objects), a particularly strong result given the difficulty in attaining accuracy found with previous methods. 4. The results suggested that N‐mixture models in their current form may not be the most appropriate approach to estimating the abundance of wildlife detected in RPAS surveys with automated detection, and accurate estimates could be made with approaches that account for spurious detections. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7417234/ /pubmed/32788970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6522 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Corcoran, Evangeline Denman, Simon Hamilton, Grant New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
title | New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
title_full | New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
title_fullStr | New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
title_short | New technologies in the mix: Assessing N‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
title_sort | new technologies in the mix: assessing n‐mixture models for abundance estimation using automated detection data from drone surveys |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT corcoranevangeline newtechnologiesinthemixassessingnmixturemodelsforabundanceestimationusingautomateddetectiondatafromdronesurveys AT denmansimon newtechnologiesinthemixassessingnmixturemodelsforabundanceestimationusingautomateddetectiondatafromdronesurveys AT hamiltongrant newtechnologiesinthemixassessingnmixturemodelsforabundanceestimationusingautomateddetectiondatafromdronesurveys |