Cargando…

Bayesian population receptive field modelling

We introduce a probabilistic (Bayesian) framework and associated software toolbox for mapping population receptive fields (pRFs) based on fMRI data. This generic approach is intended to work with stimuli of any dimension and is demonstrated and validated in the context of 2D retinotopic mapping. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeidman, Peter, Silson, Edward Harry, Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Samuel, Baker, Chris Ian, Penny, Will
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.008
_version_ 1783569573243518976
author Zeidman, Peter
Silson, Edward Harry
Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Samuel
Baker, Chris Ian
Penny, Will
author_facet Zeidman, Peter
Silson, Edward Harry
Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Samuel
Baker, Chris Ian
Penny, Will
author_sort Zeidman, Peter
collection PubMed
description We introduce a probabilistic (Bayesian) framework and associated software toolbox for mapping population receptive fields (pRFs) based on fMRI data. This generic approach is intended to work with stimuli of any dimension and is demonstrated and validated in the context of 2D retinotopic mapping. The framework enables the experimenter to specify generative (encoding) models of fMRI timeseries, in which experimental stimuli enter a pRF model of neural activity, which in turns drives a nonlinear model of neurovascular coupling and Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) response. The neuronal and haemodynamic parameters are estimated together on a voxel-by-voxel or region-of-interest basis using a Bayesian estimation algorithm (variational Laplace). This offers several novel contributions to receptive field modelling. The variance/covariance of parameters are estimated, enabling receptive fields to be plotted while properly representing uncertainty about pRF size and location. Variability in the haemodynamic response across the brain is accounted for. Furthermore, the framework introduces formal hypothesis testing to pRF analysis, enabling competing models to be evaluated based on their log model evidence (approximated by the variational free energy), which represents the optimal tradeoff between accuracy and complexity. Using simulations and empirical data, we found that parameters typically used to represent pRF size and neuronal scaling are strongly correlated, which is taken into account by the Bayesian methods we describe when making inferences. We used the framework to compare the evidence for six variants of pRF model using 7 T functional MRI data and we found a circular Difference of Gaussians (DoG) model to be the best explanation for our data overall. We hope this framework will prove useful for mapping stimulus spaces with any number of dimensions onto the anatomy of the brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7417811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74178112020-08-13 Bayesian population receptive field modelling Zeidman, Peter Silson, Edward Harry Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Samuel Baker, Chris Ian Penny, Will Neuroimage Article We introduce a probabilistic (Bayesian) framework and associated software toolbox for mapping population receptive fields (pRFs) based on fMRI data. This generic approach is intended to work with stimuli of any dimension and is demonstrated and validated in the context of 2D retinotopic mapping. The framework enables the experimenter to specify generative (encoding) models of fMRI timeseries, in which experimental stimuli enter a pRF model of neural activity, which in turns drives a nonlinear model of neurovascular coupling and Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) response. The neuronal and haemodynamic parameters are estimated together on a voxel-by-voxel or region-of-interest basis using a Bayesian estimation algorithm (variational Laplace). This offers several novel contributions to receptive field modelling. The variance/covariance of parameters are estimated, enabling receptive fields to be plotted while properly representing uncertainty about pRF size and location. Variability in the haemodynamic response across the brain is accounted for. Furthermore, the framework introduces formal hypothesis testing to pRF analysis, enabling competing models to be evaluated based on their log model evidence (approximated by the variational free energy), which represents the optimal tradeoff between accuracy and complexity. Using simulations and empirical data, we found that parameters typically used to represent pRF size and neuronal scaling are strongly correlated, which is taken into account by the Bayesian methods we describe when making inferences. We used the framework to compare the evidence for six variants of pRF model using 7 T functional MRI data and we found a circular Difference of Gaussians (DoG) model to be the best explanation for our data overall. We hope this framework will prove useful for mapping stimulus spaces with any number of dimensions onto the anatomy of the brain. Academic Press 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7417811/ /pubmed/28890416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.008 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zeidman, Peter
Silson, Edward Harry
Schwarzkopf, Dietrich Samuel
Baker, Chris Ian
Penny, Will
Bayesian population receptive field modelling
title Bayesian population receptive field modelling
title_full Bayesian population receptive field modelling
title_fullStr Bayesian population receptive field modelling
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian population receptive field modelling
title_short Bayesian population receptive field modelling
title_sort bayesian population receptive field modelling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28890416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.008
work_keys_str_mv AT zeidmanpeter bayesianpopulationreceptivefieldmodelling
AT silsonedwardharry bayesianpopulationreceptivefieldmodelling
AT schwarzkopfdietrichsamuel bayesianpopulationreceptivefieldmodelling
AT bakerchrisian bayesianpopulationreceptivefieldmodelling
AT pennywill bayesianpopulationreceptivefieldmodelling