Cargando…

Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of measures of levator hiatal distension at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver for symptoms of vaginal laxity. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecological unit. All women underwent a standardized interview, clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzini, C., Friedman, T., Turel, F., Dietz, H. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.21873
_version_ 1783569574169411584
author Manzini, C.
Friedman, T.
Turel, F.
Dietz, H. P.
author_facet Manzini, C.
Friedman, T.
Turel, F.
Dietz, H. P.
author_sort Manzini, C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of measures of levator hiatal distension at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver for symptoms of vaginal laxity. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecological unit. All women underwent a standardized interview, clinical examination and four‐dimensional translabial ultrasound examination. Area, anteroposterior diameter (APD) and coronal diameter (CD) of the levator hiatus were measured at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions using the rendered volume technique, by an operator blinded to all clinical data. The association between levator hiatal measurements and vaginal laxity was assessed, and receiver‐operating‐characteristics (ROC)‐curve analysis was used to determine their predictive value. RESULTS: Data from 490 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 58 (range, 18–88) years, and vaginal laxity was reported by 111 (23%) women. Measurements obtained on maximum Valsalva were significantly larger in women who reported vaginal laxity than in those who did not, with mean levator hiatal area, APD and CD of 30.45 ± 8.74 cm(2), 7.24 ± 1.16 cm and 5.60 ± 0.89 cm, respectively, in the vaginal‐laxity group, compared with 24.84 ± 8.63 cm(2), 6.64 ± 1.22 cm and 5.01 ± 0.97 cm in the no‐laxity group (P < 0.001 for all). Measurements obtained at rest were not significantly different between the groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for age, body mass index, vaginal parity and levator avulsion confirmed these results. The best regression model for the prediction of vaginal laxity included age, vaginal parity and levator hiatal area on maximum Valsalva. ROC‐curve analysis of levator hiatal measurements on maximum Valsalva in the prediction of vaginal laxity demonstrated areas under the curve of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63–0.73) for area, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.57–0.68) for APD and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62–0.73) for CD. CONCLUSIONS: Levator hiatal area on maximum Valsalva seems to be the measure of levator ani distensibility that is most predictive of symptoms of vaginal laxity. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7417815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74178152020-08-12 Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive? Manzini, C. Friedman, T. Turel, F. Dietz, H. P. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of measures of levator hiatal distension at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver for symptoms of vaginal laxity. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecological unit. All women underwent a standardized interview, clinical examination and four‐dimensional translabial ultrasound examination. Area, anteroposterior diameter (APD) and coronal diameter (CD) of the levator hiatus were measured at rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions using the rendered volume technique, by an operator blinded to all clinical data. The association between levator hiatal measurements and vaginal laxity was assessed, and receiver‐operating‐characteristics (ROC)‐curve analysis was used to determine their predictive value. RESULTS: Data from 490 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 58 (range, 18–88) years, and vaginal laxity was reported by 111 (23%) women. Measurements obtained on maximum Valsalva were significantly larger in women who reported vaginal laxity than in those who did not, with mean levator hiatal area, APD and CD of 30.45 ± 8.74 cm(2), 7.24 ± 1.16 cm and 5.60 ± 0.89 cm, respectively, in the vaginal‐laxity group, compared with 24.84 ± 8.63 cm(2), 6.64 ± 1.22 cm and 5.01 ± 0.97 cm in the no‐laxity group (P < 0.001 for all). Measurements obtained at rest were not significantly different between the groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for age, body mass index, vaginal parity and levator avulsion confirmed these results. The best regression model for the prediction of vaginal laxity included age, vaginal parity and levator hiatal area on maximum Valsalva. ROC‐curve analysis of levator hiatal measurements on maximum Valsalva in the prediction of vaginal laxity demonstrated areas under the curve of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.63–0.73) for area, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.57–0.68) for APD and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62–0.73) for CD. CONCLUSIONS: Levator hiatal area on maximum Valsalva seems to be the measure of levator ani distensibility that is most predictive of symptoms of vaginal laxity. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2020-05-01 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7417815/ /pubmed/31568590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.21873 Text en 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Manzini, C.
Friedman, T.
Turel, F.
Dietz, H. P.
Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
title Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
title_full Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
title_fullStr Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
title_full_unstemmed Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
title_short Vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
title_sort vaginal laxity: which measure of levator ani distensibility is most predictive?
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.21873
work_keys_str_mv AT manzinic vaginallaxitywhichmeasureoflevatoranidistensibilityismostpredictive
AT friedmant vaginallaxitywhichmeasureoflevatoranidistensibilityismostpredictive
AT turelf vaginallaxitywhichmeasureoflevatoranidistensibilityismostpredictive
AT dietzhp vaginallaxitywhichmeasureoflevatoranidistensibilityismostpredictive