Cargando…
Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction: Xpert MTB/RIF is a rapid diagnostic instrument for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). However, studies reported varied accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pericardial effusion. Methods: We performed a systematic review of literature in PubMed, published up to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802321 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22770.1 |
_version_ | 1783569602434826240 |
---|---|
author | Andrianto, Andrianto Mertaniasih, Ni Made Gandi, Parama Al-Farabi, Makhyan Jibril Azmi, Yusuf Jonatan, Michael Silahooij, Stevanus Immanuel |
author_facet | Andrianto, Andrianto Mertaniasih, Ni Made Gandi, Parama Al-Farabi, Makhyan Jibril Azmi, Yusuf Jonatan, Michael Silahooij, Stevanus Immanuel |
author_sort | Andrianto, Andrianto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Xpert MTB/RIF is a rapid diagnostic instrument for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). However, studies reported varied accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pericardial effusion. Methods: We performed a systematic review of literature in PubMed, published up to February 1, 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines. We screened cross-sectional studies, observational cohort studies, and randomized control trials that evaluated the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosing TB pericarditis. Papers with noninterpretable results of sensitivity and specificity, non-English articles, and unpublished studies were excluded. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF. We conducted a quality assessment using QUADAS-2 to evaluate the quality of the studies. A bivariate model pooled the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLRs), and negative likelihood ratios (NLRs) of included studies. Results: In total, 581 subjects from nine studies were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that the overall sensitivity, specificity, PLRs and NLRs of included studies were 0.676 (95% CI: 0.580–0.759), 0.994 (95% CI: 0.919–1.000), 110.11 (95% CI: 7.65–1584.57) and 0.326 (95% CI: 0.246–0.433), respectively. Conclusions: Xpert MTB/RIF had a robust specificity but unsatisfactory sensitivity in diagnosing TB pericarditis. These findings indicated that although positive Xpert MTB/RIF test results might be valuable in swiftly distinguishing the diagnosis of TB pericarditis, negative test results might not be able to rule out TB pericarditis. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020167480 28/04/2020 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7417956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74179562020-08-13 Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Andrianto, Andrianto Mertaniasih, Ni Made Gandi, Parama Al-Farabi, Makhyan Jibril Azmi, Yusuf Jonatan, Michael Silahooij, Stevanus Immanuel F1000Res Systematic Review Introduction: Xpert MTB/RIF is a rapid diagnostic instrument for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). However, studies reported varied accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pericardial effusion. Methods: We performed a systematic review of literature in PubMed, published up to February 1, 2020, according to PRISMA guidelines. We screened cross-sectional studies, observational cohort studies, and randomized control trials that evaluated the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosing TB pericarditis. Papers with noninterpretable results of sensitivity and specificity, non-English articles, and unpublished studies were excluded. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF. We conducted a quality assessment using QUADAS-2 to evaluate the quality of the studies. A bivariate model pooled the overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (PLRs), and negative likelihood ratios (NLRs) of included studies. Results: In total, 581 subjects from nine studies were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that the overall sensitivity, specificity, PLRs and NLRs of included studies were 0.676 (95% CI: 0.580–0.759), 0.994 (95% CI: 0.919–1.000), 110.11 (95% CI: 7.65–1584.57) and 0.326 (95% CI: 0.246–0.433), respectively. Conclusions: Xpert MTB/RIF had a robust specificity but unsatisfactory sensitivity in diagnosing TB pericarditis. These findings indicated that although positive Xpert MTB/RIF test results might be valuable in swiftly distinguishing the diagnosis of TB pericarditis, negative test results might not be able to rule out TB pericarditis. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020167480 28/04/2020 F1000 Research Limited 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7417956/ /pubmed/32802321 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22770.1 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Andrianto A et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Andrianto, Andrianto Mertaniasih, Ni Made Gandi, Parama Al-Farabi, Makhyan Jibril Azmi, Yusuf Jonatan, Michael Silahooij, Stevanus Immanuel Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic test accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic test accuracy of xpert mtb/rif for tuberculous pericarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802321 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22770.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andriantoandrianto diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mertaniasihnimade diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gandiparama diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT alfarabimakhyanjibril diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT azmiyusuf diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jonatanmichael diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT silahooijstevanusimmanuel diagnostictestaccuracyofxpertmtbriffortuberculouspericarditisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |