Cargando…
Do letters about conspiracy belief studies greatly exaggerate? A reply to Sutton and Douglas
Autores principales: | Freeman, Daniel, Waite, Felicity, Rosebrock, Laina, Petit, Ariane, Bold, Emily, Mulhall, Sophie, Carr, Lydia, Teale, Ashley-Louise, Jenner, Lucy, East, Anna, Causier, Chiara, Bird, Jessica C., Lambe, Sinéad |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7417976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32729443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002913 |
Ejemplares similares
-
We should beware of ignoring uncomfortable possible truths (a reply to McManus et al)
por: Freeman, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
False Memories and Free Speech: Is Scientific Debate Being Suppressed?
por: Andrews, Bernice, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Why study EU foreign policy at all? A response to Keuleers, Fonck and Keukeleire
por: Dijkstra, Hylke, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Virtual Reality Cognitive Therapy in Inpatient Psychiatric Wards: Protocol for a Qualitative Investigation of Staff and Patient Views Across Multiple National Health Service Sites
por: Brown, Poppy, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Catastrophic cognitions about coronavirus: the Oxford psychological investigation of coronavirus questionnaire [TOPIC-Q]
por: Rosebrock, Laina, et al.
Publicado: (2021)