Cargando…

Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: In Ethiopia, there is a paucity of studies on inequality in caesarean section using methodologically rigorous and well-established approaches. In this study, we showed extent and the overtime dynamics of inequality in caesarean section in Ethiopia following rigorous methodologies. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shibre, Gebretsadik, Idriss-Wheeler, Dina, Bishwajit, Ghose, Yaya, Sanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09297-x
_version_ 1783569678205976576
author Shibre, Gebretsadik
Idriss-Wheeler, Dina
Bishwajit, Ghose
Yaya, Sanni
author_facet Shibre, Gebretsadik
Idriss-Wheeler, Dina
Bishwajit, Ghose
Yaya, Sanni
author_sort Shibre, Gebretsadik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Ethiopia, there is a paucity of studies on inequality in caesarean section using methodologically rigorous and well-established approaches. In this study, we showed extent and the overtime dynamics of inequality in caesarean section in Ethiopia following rigorous methodologies. METHODS: The data for analysis came from Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys (EDHS) conducted between 2000 and 2016. We used the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) to analyze the data. Caesarean delivery was disaggregated by four equity stratifiers, namely education, wealth, residence and regions. Relative and absolute summary measures were calculated for each equity stratifier to capture inequality from different perspectives. 95% Uncertainty Interval was calculated around a point estimate to measure statistical significance. RESULTS: We found large socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in all study surveys. The inequalities have occurred in favour of socioeconomically advantaged women and those living in urban areas and certain regions such as Addis Ababa. While area-related inequality had generally increased with time, socioeconomic inequality showed fluctuation. Adoption of different measures in the study for the inequality analysis has caused the emergence of mix of patterns in caesarean section inequality over time. CONCLUSIONS: In all the surveys, wealthy and more educated women, and those residing in urban areas had higher chance of obtaining caesarean delivery. Policy makers should work to ensure caesarean section that is in the accepted normal range. More emphasis should be drawn to subpopulation with under use of caesarean section while at the same time, discouraging unjustified use of it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74183792020-08-12 Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study Shibre, Gebretsadik Idriss-Wheeler, Dina Bishwajit, Ghose Yaya, Sanni BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In Ethiopia, there is a paucity of studies on inequality in caesarean section using methodologically rigorous and well-established approaches. In this study, we showed extent and the overtime dynamics of inequality in caesarean section in Ethiopia following rigorous methodologies. METHODS: The data for analysis came from Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys (EDHS) conducted between 2000 and 2016. We used the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT) to analyze the data. Caesarean delivery was disaggregated by four equity stratifiers, namely education, wealth, residence and regions. Relative and absolute summary measures were calculated for each equity stratifier to capture inequality from different perspectives. 95% Uncertainty Interval was calculated around a point estimate to measure statistical significance. RESULTS: We found large socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in all study surveys. The inequalities have occurred in favour of socioeconomically advantaged women and those living in urban areas and certain regions such as Addis Ababa. While area-related inequality had generally increased with time, socioeconomic inequality showed fluctuation. Adoption of different measures in the study for the inequality analysis has caused the emergence of mix of patterns in caesarean section inequality over time. CONCLUSIONS: In all the surveys, wealthy and more educated women, and those residing in urban areas had higher chance of obtaining caesarean delivery. Policy makers should work to ensure caesarean section that is in the accepted normal range. More emphasis should be drawn to subpopulation with under use of caesarean section while at the same time, discouraging unjustified use of it. BioMed Central 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7418379/ /pubmed/32781997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09297-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shibre, Gebretsadik
Idriss-Wheeler, Dina
Bishwajit, Ghose
Yaya, Sanni
Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_full Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_short Observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
title_sort observed trends in the magnitude of socioeconomic and area-based inequalities in use of caesarean section in ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32781997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09297-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shibregebretsadik observedtrendsinthemagnitudeofsocioeconomicandareabasedinequalitiesinuseofcaesareansectioninethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT idrisswheelerdina observedtrendsinthemagnitudeofsocioeconomicandareabasedinequalitiesinuseofcaesareansectioninethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT bishwajitghose observedtrendsinthemagnitudeofsocioeconomicandareabasedinequalitiesinuseofcaesareansectioninethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy
AT yayasanni observedtrendsinthemagnitudeofsocioeconomicandareabasedinequalitiesinuseofcaesareansectioninethiopiaacrosssectionalstudy