Cargando…

Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

BACKGROUND: Microglial dysfunction is implicated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Although studies have reported excessive microglial activation or senescence (dystrophy) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), few have explored this in FTLD. We examined regional patterns of microglial burden, acti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woollacott, Ione O. C., Toomey, Christina E., Strand, Catherine, Courtney, Robert, Benson, Bridget C., Rohrer, Jonathan D., Lashley, Tammaryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01907-0
_version_ 1783569683292618752
author Woollacott, Ione O. C.
Toomey, Christina E.
Strand, Catherine
Courtney, Robert
Benson, Bridget C.
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
Lashley, Tammaryn
author_facet Woollacott, Ione O. C.
Toomey, Christina E.
Strand, Catherine
Courtney, Robert
Benson, Bridget C.
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
Lashley, Tammaryn
author_sort Woollacott, Ione O. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microglial dysfunction is implicated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Although studies have reported excessive microglial activation or senescence (dystrophy) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), few have explored this in FTLD. We examined regional patterns of microglial burden, activation and dystrophy in sporadic and genetic FTLD, sporadic AD and controls. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed in frontal and temporal grey and white matter from 50 pathologically confirmed FTLD cases (31 sporadic, 19 genetic: 20 FTLD-tau, 26 FTLD-TDP, four FTLD-FUS), five AD cases and five controls, using markers to detect phagocytic (CD68-positive) and antigen-presenting (CR3/43-positive) microglia, and microglia in general (Iba1-positive). Microglial burden and activation (morphology) were assessed quantitatively for each microglial phenotype. Iba1-positive microglia were assessed semi-quantitatively for dystrophy severity and qualitatively for rod-shaped and hypertrophic morphology. Microglia were compared in each region between FTLD, AD and controls, and between different pathological subtypes of FTLD, including its main subtypes (FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP, FTLD-FUS), and subtypes of FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP and genetic FTLD. Microglia were also compared between grey and white matter within each lobe for each group. RESULTS: There was a higher burden of phagocytic and antigen-presenting microglia in FTLD and AD cases than controls, but activation was often not increased. Burden was generally higher in white matter than grey matter, but activation was greater in grey matter. However, microglia varied regionally according to FTLD subtype and disease mechanism. Dystrophy was more severe in FTLD and AD than controls, and more severe in white than grey matter, but this also varied regionally and was particularly extensive in FTLD due to progranulin (GRN) mutations. Presence of rod-shaped and hypertrophic microglia also varied by FTLD subtype. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates regionally variable microglial involvement in FTLD and links this to underlying disease mechanisms. This supports investigation of microglial dysfunction in disease models and consideration of anti-senescence therapies in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74184032020-08-12 Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration Woollacott, Ione O. C. Toomey, Christina E. Strand, Catherine Courtney, Robert Benson, Bridget C. Rohrer, Jonathan D. Lashley, Tammaryn J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: Microglial dysfunction is implicated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). Although studies have reported excessive microglial activation or senescence (dystrophy) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), few have explored this in FTLD. We examined regional patterns of microglial burden, activation and dystrophy in sporadic and genetic FTLD, sporadic AD and controls. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed in frontal and temporal grey and white matter from 50 pathologically confirmed FTLD cases (31 sporadic, 19 genetic: 20 FTLD-tau, 26 FTLD-TDP, four FTLD-FUS), five AD cases and five controls, using markers to detect phagocytic (CD68-positive) and antigen-presenting (CR3/43-positive) microglia, and microglia in general (Iba1-positive). Microglial burden and activation (morphology) were assessed quantitatively for each microglial phenotype. Iba1-positive microglia were assessed semi-quantitatively for dystrophy severity and qualitatively for rod-shaped and hypertrophic morphology. Microglia were compared in each region between FTLD, AD and controls, and between different pathological subtypes of FTLD, including its main subtypes (FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP, FTLD-FUS), and subtypes of FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP and genetic FTLD. Microglia were also compared between grey and white matter within each lobe for each group. RESULTS: There was a higher burden of phagocytic and antigen-presenting microglia in FTLD and AD cases than controls, but activation was often not increased. Burden was generally higher in white matter than grey matter, but activation was greater in grey matter. However, microglia varied regionally according to FTLD subtype and disease mechanism. Dystrophy was more severe in FTLD and AD than controls, and more severe in white than grey matter, but this also varied regionally and was particularly extensive in FTLD due to progranulin (GRN) mutations. Presence of rod-shaped and hypertrophic microglia also varied by FTLD subtype. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates regionally variable microglial involvement in FTLD and links this to underlying disease mechanisms. This supports investigation of microglial dysfunction in disease models and consideration of anti-senescence therapies in clinical trials. BioMed Central 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7418403/ /pubmed/32778130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01907-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Woollacott, Ione O. C.
Toomey, Christina E.
Strand, Catherine
Courtney, Robert
Benson, Bridget C.
Rohrer, Jonathan D.
Lashley, Tammaryn
Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
title Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
title_full Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
title_fullStr Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
title_full_unstemmed Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
title_short Microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
title_sort microglial burden, activation and dystrophy patterns in frontotemporal lobar degeneration
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-020-01907-0
work_keys_str_mv AT woollacottioneoc microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration
AT toomeychristinae microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration
AT strandcatherine microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration
AT courtneyrobert microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration
AT bensonbridgetc microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration
AT rohrerjonathand microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration
AT lashleytammaryn microglialburdenactivationanddystrophypatternsinfrontotemporallobardegeneration