Cargando…
Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment
BACKGROUND: Psychiatric inpatients receive a multidisciplinary treatment approach, covering psychiatry, nursing, occupational therapy, and psychology. Research findings reveal that the effectiveness of any treatment is associated with three types of factors: specific (e.g., treatment techniques), co...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05617-4 |
_version_ | 1783569685886795776 |
---|---|
author | Locher, Cosima Mansour, Ramin Koechlin, Helen Büchi, Stefan |
author_facet | Locher, Cosima Mansour, Ramin Koechlin, Helen Büchi, Stefan |
author_sort | Locher, Cosima |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Psychiatric inpatients receive a multidisciplinary treatment approach, covering psychiatry, nursing, occupational therapy, and psychology. Research findings reveal that the effectiveness of any treatment is associated with three types of factors: specific (e.g., treatment techniques), common (e.g., clinician-patient relationship, patients’ expectations) and extra-therapeutic. However, there is little published research on the factors and events which inpatients themselves consider to be beneficial (‘beneficial moments’). METHODS: Inpatients (N = 107) of a psychiatric clinic completed a questionnaire to elicit their appraisal of beneficial moments. A qualitative content analysis was applied. The coding procedure was conducted independently by two authors. RESULTS: Self-appraised beneficial moments were found in five areas: therapy-specific components (number of quotations, N = 204), positive relationships (N = 140), clinical setting and environment (N = 52), inpatients’ new insights (N = 36), and factors unrelated to either therapy or the clinic (N = 30). In total, 44% of the quotations were related to specific factors, 49% to common factors, and 7% to extra-therapeutic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients judge both specific and common factors as crucial for the therapeutic benefit they gain during their stay at the clinic. Our results differ from meta-analytical findings, where the impact of specific factors on symptom improvement has shown to be much smaller (i.e., 17%) than appraised by patients in our study (i.e., 44%). Our study underlines the importance of a patient-centred care approach as well as shared decision making and patient-clinician communication. For clinical practice, knowledge of inpatients’ perspectives on beneficial moments is crucial in order to reinforce precisely these therapeutic components. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7418414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74184142020-08-12 Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment Locher, Cosima Mansour, Ramin Koechlin, Helen Büchi, Stefan BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Psychiatric inpatients receive a multidisciplinary treatment approach, covering psychiatry, nursing, occupational therapy, and psychology. Research findings reveal that the effectiveness of any treatment is associated with three types of factors: specific (e.g., treatment techniques), common (e.g., clinician-patient relationship, patients’ expectations) and extra-therapeutic. However, there is little published research on the factors and events which inpatients themselves consider to be beneficial (‘beneficial moments’). METHODS: Inpatients (N = 107) of a psychiatric clinic completed a questionnaire to elicit their appraisal of beneficial moments. A qualitative content analysis was applied. The coding procedure was conducted independently by two authors. RESULTS: Self-appraised beneficial moments were found in five areas: therapy-specific components (number of quotations, N = 204), positive relationships (N = 140), clinical setting and environment (N = 52), inpatients’ new insights (N = 36), and factors unrelated to either therapy or the clinic (N = 30). In total, 44% of the quotations were related to specific factors, 49% to common factors, and 7% to extra-therapeutic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients judge both specific and common factors as crucial for the therapeutic benefit they gain during their stay at the clinic. Our results differ from meta-analytical findings, where the impact of specific factors on symptom improvement has shown to be much smaller (i.e., 17%) than appraised by patients in our study (i.e., 44%). Our study underlines the importance of a patient-centred care approach as well as shared decision making and patient-clinician communication. For clinical practice, knowledge of inpatients’ perspectives on beneficial moments is crucial in order to reinforce precisely these therapeutic components. BioMed Central 2020-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7418414/ /pubmed/32778097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05617-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Locher, Cosima Mansour, Ramin Koechlin, Helen Büchi, Stefan Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
title | Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
title_full | Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
title_fullStr | Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
title_short | Patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
title_sort | patient-appraised beneficial moments during inpatient psychiatric treatment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32778097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05617-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lochercosima patientappraisedbeneficialmomentsduringinpatientpsychiatrictreatment AT mansourramin patientappraisedbeneficialmomentsduringinpatientpsychiatrictreatment AT koechlinhelen patientappraisedbeneficialmomentsduringinpatientpsychiatrictreatment AT buchistefan patientappraisedbeneficialmomentsduringinpatientpsychiatrictreatment |