Cargando…

Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching

Despite the large number of studies on blastocyst transfers, it is unclear whether day 6 blastocysts have similar pregnancy rates and safety with day 5 blastocysts. Thus, this study aimed to compare the obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 5 and day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers (VBT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Dong Soo, Kim, Ji Won, Chang, Eun Mi, Lee, Woo Sik, Yoon, Tae Ki, Lyu, Sang Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849288
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00499
_version_ 1783569693764747264
author Park, Dong Soo
Kim, Ji Won
Chang, Eun Mi
Lee, Woo Sik
Yoon, Tae Ki
Lyu, Sang Woo
author_facet Park, Dong Soo
Kim, Ji Won
Chang, Eun Mi
Lee, Woo Sik
Yoon, Tae Ki
Lyu, Sang Woo
author_sort Park, Dong Soo
collection PubMed
description Despite the large number of studies on blastocyst transfers, it is unclear whether day 6 blastocysts have similar pregnancy rates and safety with day 5 blastocysts. Thus, this study aimed to compare the obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 5 and day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers (VBT). In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching, we evaluated 1,313 cycles of VBT performed between January 2014 and December 2015 at the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. All cycles underwent natural endometrial preparation. We used propensity score matching to compare day 5 and day 6 VBTs in a matched comparison. After propensity score matching, there were 465 cycles of day 5 VBT and 155 cycles of day 6 VBT. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly lower in day 6 VBTs (44.2 vs. 53.1%, p = 0.023; 48.4 vs. 60.4%, p = 0.009; 33.5 vs. 51.8%, p < 0.001). Miscarriage rate was significantly higher in day 6 VBTs (29.3 vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Rate of multiple gestations was similar between the two groups (29.3 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.816). Assessing 241 and 52 babies from day 5 and day 6 VBTs, no differences were found in neonatal outcomes including rates of low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital malformations. In propensity score-matched analysis, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes between day 5 and day 6 VBTs were similar so that day 6 VBTs are as safe as day 5 VBTs. IR, CPR, and LBR were are all significantly lower in day 6 VBTs. Therefore, if there are no differences in the morphological grade between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, transfer of day 5 vitrified blastocysts should be considered first.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74184542020-08-25 Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching Park, Dong Soo Kim, Ji Won Chang, Eun Mi Lee, Woo Sik Yoon, Tae Ki Lyu, Sang Woo Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Despite the large number of studies on blastocyst transfers, it is unclear whether day 6 blastocysts have similar pregnancy rates and safety with day 5 blastocysts. Thus, this study aimed to compare the obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 5 and day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfers (VBT). In this retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching, we evaluated 1,313 cycles of VBT performed between January 2014 and December 2015 at the Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center. All cycles underwent natural endometrial preparation. We used propensity score matching to compare day 5 and day 6 VBTs in a matched comparison. After propensity score matching, there were 465 cycles of day 5 VBT and 155 cycles of day 6 VBT. Implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and live birth rate (LBR) were significantly lower in day 6 VBTs (44.2 vs. 53.1%, p = 0.023; 48.4 vs. 60.4%, p = 0.009; 33.5 vs. 51.8%, p < 0.001). Miscarriage rate was significantly higher in day 6 VBTs (29.3 vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Rate of multiple gestations was similar between the two groups (29.3 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.816). Assessing 241 and 52 babies from day 5 and day 6 VBTs, no differences were found in neonatal outcomes including rates of low birth weight, preterm birth, and congenital malformations. In propensity score-matched analysis, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes between day 5 and day 6 VBTs were similar so that day 6 VBTs are as safe as day 5 VBTs. IR, CPR, and LBR were are all significantly lower in day 6 VBTs. Therefore, if there are no differences in the morphological grade between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, transfer of day 5 vitrified blastocysts should be considered first. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7418454/ /pubmed/32849288 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00499 Text en Copyright © 2020 Park, Kim, Chang, Lee, Yoon and Lyu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Park, Dong Soo
Kim, Ji Won
Chang, Eun Mi
Lee, Woo Sik
Yoon, Tae Ki
Lyu, Sang Woo
Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
title Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
title_full Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
title_fullStr Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
title_full_unstemmed Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
title_short Obstetric, Neonatal, and Clinical Outcomes of Day 6 vs. Day 5 Vitrified-Warmed Blastocyst Transfers: Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching
title_sort obstetric, neonatal, and clinical outcomes of day 6 vs. day 5 vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers: retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849288
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00499
work_keys_str_mv AT parkdongsoo obstetricneonatalandclinicaloutcomesofday6vsday5vitrifiedwarmedblastocysttransfersretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematching
AT kimjiwon obstetricneonatalandclinicaloutcomesofday6vsday5vitrifiedwarmedblastocysttransfersretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematching
AT changeunmi obstetricneonatalandclinicaloutcomesofday6vsday5vitrifiedwarmedblastocysttransfersretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematching
AT leewoosik obstetricneonatalandclinicaloutcomesofday6vsday5vitrifiedwarmedblastocysttransfersretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematching
AT yoontaeki obstetricneonatalandclinicaloutcomesofday6vsday5vitrifiedwarmedblastocysttransfersretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematching
AT lyusangwoo obstetricneonatalandclinicaloutcomesofday6vsday5vitrifiedwarmedblastocysttransfersretrospectivecohortstudywithpropensityscorematching