Cargando…

High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xin, Wang, Lei, Wang, Yang, Kang, Jingjing, Jiang, Wei, Men, Yu, Hui, Zhouguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01222
_version_ 1783569700558471168
author Sun, Xin
Wang, Lei
Wang, Yang
Kang, Jingjing
Jiang, Wei
Men, Yu
Hui, Zhouguang
author_facet Sun, Xin
Wang, Lei
Wang, Yang
Kang, Jingjing
Jiang, Wei
Men, Yu
Hui, Zhouguang
author_sort Sun, Xin
collection PubMed
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local–regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70–0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local–regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46–0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68–0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local–regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40–0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93–1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3–5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54–2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3–5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93–2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70–3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92–1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local–regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74184932020-08-25 High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis Sun, Xin Wang, Lei Wang, Yang Kang, Jingjing Jiang, Wei Men, Yu Hui, Zhouguang Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local–regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70–0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local–regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46–0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68–0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local–regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40–0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93–1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3–5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54–2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3–5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93–2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70–3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92–1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local–regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7418493/ /pubmed/32850362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01222 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sun, Wang, Wang, Kang, Jiang, Men and Hui. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Sun, Xin
Wang, Lei
Wang, Yang
Kang, Jingjing
Jiang, Wei
Men, Yu
Hui, Zhouguang
High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
title High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
title_full High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
title_short High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort high vs. low radiation dose of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma with modern radiotherapy techniques: a meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850362
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01222
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxin highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis
AT wanglei highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis
AT wangyang highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis
AT kangjingjing highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis
AT jiangwei highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis
AT menyu highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis
AT huizhouguang highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis