Cargando…
High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01222 |
_version_ | 1783569700558471168 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Xin Wang, Lei Wang, Yang Kang, Jingjing Jiang, Wei Men, Yu Hui, Zhouguang |
author_facet | Sun, Xin Wang, Lei Wang, Yang Kang, Jingjing Jiang, Wei Men, Yu Hui, Zhouguang |
author_sort | Sun, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local–regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70–0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local–regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46–0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68–0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local–regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40–0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93–1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3–5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54–2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3–5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93–2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70–3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92–1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local–regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7418493 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74184932020-08-25 High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis Sun, Xin Wang, Lei Wang, Yang Kang, Jingjing Jiang, Wei Men, Yu Hui, Zhouguang Front Oncol Oncology Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefit of different radiation doses in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for esophageal carcinoma using modern radiotherapy techniques. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by screening PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SCOPUS, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases with prespecified searching strategy. Studies which compared high radiation dose group with low-dose radiation group using modern radiotherapy techniques for esophageal cancer patients in CCRT were identified. The hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and the odds ratios (OR) for local–regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis (DM), and toxicities were considered as the outcomes of interest. R 3.6.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twelve studies involving 10,896 patients were included for analyses. The results showed that the high-dose group had better OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.70–0.90, P = 0.0004) and the local–regional control (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46–0.76, P < 0.0001), especially for patients who were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The subgroup analyses further indicated that ≥ circa 60 Gy can significantly improve the OS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.68–0.80, P < 0.0001) as well as the local–regional control (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.40–0.74, P < 0.0001) as compared with < circa 60 Gy. Another subgroup analysis comparing ≤ 50.4 Gy with > 50.4 Gy showed no substantial difference in OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.93–1.03, P = 0.43). In addition, there are no significant differences between the two groups in grade 3–5 radiation pneumonitis (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.54–2.05, P = 0.89), grade 3–5 radiation esophagitis (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 0.93–2.11, P = 0.11), treatment-related death (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.70–3.66, P = 0.27), and DM (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.92–1.59, P = 0.17). Conclusions: For esophageal carcinoma receiving CCRT with modern radiation techniques, evidence suggested that high-dose radiotherapy, especially ≥circa 60 Gy, had potentials to improve the OS and local–regional control without increase in severe toxicities when compared with low-dose radiotherapy. The result needs to be confirmed by randomized clinical trials. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7418493/ /pubmed/32850362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01222 Text en Copyright © 2020 Sun, Wang, Wang, Kang, Jiang, Men and Hui. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Sun, Xin Wang, Lei Wang, Yang Kang, Jingjing Jiang, Wei Men, Yu Hui, Zhouguang High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis |
title | High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | High vs. Low Radiation Dose of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma With Modern Radiotherapy Techniques: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | high vs. low radiation dose of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma with modern radiotherapy techniques: a meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418493/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850362 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunxin highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis AT wanglei highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis AT wangyang highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis AT kangjingjing highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis AT jiangwei highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis AT menyu highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis AT huizhouguang highvslowradiationdoseofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyforesophagealcarcinomawithmodernradiotherapytechniquesametaanalysis |